Name This...(298)

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

Name This...(298)

Post by Brady »

???







Image
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Tankerace »

Big freaking US Naval gun, looks like either a 5"/51 Mk 7 or a 6"/53 Mk 9.
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by pompack »

Just a wild guess, but if you're gonna guess, might as well be specific [:)]

5"/51 upper deck mount on USS Texas


Also a guess, the picture dates from about 1938.
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Hornblower »

USN 4” L/50 or 5” L/51. I’m inclined to think it’s the 4”
User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Tankerace »

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

USN 4” L/50 or 5” L/51. I’m inclined to think it’s the 4”

I don't think so. In doing research for War Plan Orange, all US destroyers armed with the 4"/50 Mk 9 had gunshields, whereas the 5"/51 Mk 7 did not. If it had a shield I'd say 4", but the mounting and lack again makes me inclined to 5"/51 Mk7 or 6"/53 Mk 9, as mounted on the last 3 V boats (Argonaut, Narwhal, and Nautilus).
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
anarchyintheuk
Posts: 3958
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by anarchyintheuk »

I'll side w/ pompack on this one because texas rules . . . er . . . the USS Texas rules. It's so far out of the water it has to be an upper deck 5'.
User avatar
Jorm
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 5:40 am
Location: Melbourne

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Jorm »

is it a single mount torpedo launcher ?
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Tankerace

Big freaking US Naval gun, looks like either a 5"/51 Mk 7 or a 6"/53 Mk 9.

If we look back at an old Name This - there was a picture of a US sub letting off some troops from the stern, and armed with 6" guns on pedestal mounts (i forget which sub - Nautilus, Narwhal).

Anyway, at that time i remarked that the 6" gun was huge, and that on the pedestal mount it looked like the breach of the gun was higher than the tops of the crew's head, and asked how they could even load such a thing without standing on a crate. This would seem to imply that this is not a 6" gun.

UPDATE: It was Name This #253 - USS Nautilus. Unfortunately, I can't get the picture to load (maybe it was purged?)[&:]
User avatar
Drex
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Chico,california

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Drex »

You guys are so good at guessing, so what is the ship behind the gun?
Col Saito: "Don't speak to me of rules! This is war! It is not a game of cricket!"
User avatar
mlees
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:14 am
Location: San Diego

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by mlees »

Looks like a four stacker destroyer back there to me.

I'm gonna guess that this a six inch gun. Notice the lifting stanchions behind the sailors. Would these be used for moving the heavy (100-120 lb ammo) shells to the gun? Tiornu? Tankerace?

Staged photo. I don't think anybody actually works a gun in their dress whites.
User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Tankerace »

If its a destroyer, its one of a handful of about 20 Clemson class Flush Deckers rearmed with the 5"/51 in all four positions. Most of these were either lost at Honda Point in 1923 (Based out of San Pedro and Mare Island) or converted to the APDs, DMs, DMSs, and AVPs we all know and love.

If its a sub its either V-4 (Argonaut), V-5 (Narwhal) or V6 (Nautilus).

If its a sub, I think the conning tower is to close to the gun, so my guess (again, if a sub) is Argonaut.
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Tankerace

If its a destroyer, its one of a handful of about 20 Clemson class Flush Deckers rearmed with the 5"/51 in all four positions. Most of these were either lost at Honda Point in 1923 (Based out of San Pedro and Mare Island) or converted to the APDs, DMs, DMSs, and AVPs we all know and love.

If its a sub its either V-4 (Argonaut), V-5 (Narwhal) or V6 (Nautilus).

If its a sub, I think the conning tower is to close to the gun, so my guess (again, if a sub) is Argonaut.

Why could this not be a secondary gun on a larger ship?
Tiornu
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:59 pm

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Tiornu »

It looks like the 5in/51 to me. I don't believe it's a V-boat; I don't recall seeing any subs with a "toe board" (for lack of better term) at the edge of the deck. The 5in/51 served aboard quite a variety of ships at various times: aircraft carriers, auxiliaries, subs, etc.
Tiornu
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:59 pm

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Tiornu »

Is that the gun's tampion sitting on its base?
User avatar
Rendova
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 3:12 am
Location: Atlanta

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Rendova »

ORIGINAL: Tiornu

Is that the gun's tampion sitting on its base?

I think your right!! It looks like it has a Big star on it.... this would lead me to guess USS Texas
User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Tankerace »

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: Tankerace

If its a destroyer, its one of a handful of about 20 Clemson class Flush Deckers rearmed with the 5"/51 in all four positions. Most of these were either lost at Honda Point in 1923 (Based out of San Pedro and Mare Island) or converted to the APDs, DMs, DMSs, and AVPs we all know and love.

If its a sub its either V-4 (Argonaut), V-5 (Narwhal) or V6 (Nautilus).

If its a sub, I think the conning tower is to close to the gun, so my guess (again, if a sub) is Argonaut.

Why could this not be a secondary gun on a larger ship?

Because after 1930 5"/51s (except I believe on the Texas and New York) were mounted in casemates below decks. All above deck 5inchers (on BBs and cruisers) were short barreled 5"/25 Mk 10 AA guns in gun tubs.
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Tankerace
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: Tankerace

If its a destroyer, its one of a handful of about 20 Clemson class Flush Deckers rearmed with the 5"/51 in all four positions. Most of these were either lost at Honda Point in 1923 (Based out of San Pedro and Mare Island) or converted to the APDs, DMs, DMSs, and AVPs we all know and love.

If its a sub its either V-4 (Argonaut), V-5 (Narwhal) or V6 (Nautilus).

If its a sub, I think the conning tower is to close to the gun, so my guess (again, if a sub) is Argonaut.

Why could this not be a secondary gun on a larger ship?

Because after 1930 5"/51s (except I believe on the Texas and New York) were mounted in casemates below decks. All above deck 5inchers (on BBs and cruisers) were short barreled 5"/25 Mk 10 AA guns in gun tubs.

OK - don't think it is a sub. These guys are too spiffy, there doesn't seem to be "flooding space" between the wooden deck slats, and there is the previously noted toe-board. Also the gun does not seem to be centered in front of the superstructure to the right.

This gives me the impression that this is a large ship - so since Texas is taken, I'll guess the 5"/51 of USS New York.
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by Brady »

5"/51, it is[:)]


.................

It's on a tneder.......Which I will run a pick of.........
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
mlees
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:14 am
Location: San Diego

RE: Name This...(298)

Post by mlees »

Getting close to your centenial anniversary, Brady. #300 better NOT be a tender...[;)]
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”