Japan Strategy Q

Gary Grigsby's World At War gives you the chance to really run a world war. History is yours to write and things may turn out differently. The Western Allies may be conquered by Germany, or Japan may defeat China. With you at the controls, leading the fates of nations and alliances. Take command in this dynamic turn-based game and test strategies that long-past generals and world leaders could only dream of. Now anything is possible in this new strategic offering from Matrix Games and 2 by 3 Games.

Moderators: Joel Billings, JanSorensen

Post Reply
User avatar
mavraam
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:32 pm

Japan Strategy Q

Post by mavraam »

I was just wondering if the following strategy is workable with Japan:

Instead of trying to expand to all areas of the Pacific, can Japan try to get away
with a more limited strategy of taking over the coast of China, Singapore, Malaya
and the other resource bearing islands between the mainland and Australia.

Then, set up a compact perimiter defense of islands with arty and planes
along with CV TF's and keep a network of tranny's to move supplies around.

Then use subs to try to cut the Allies supply routes and make it difficult for them
to launch an offensive.

The idea is that by limiting the travel of their fleets to a small area, they will save
a great deal of supplies. Also most of the battles would be fought within their
own air cover zones.

This would mean not even bothering with Pearl which seems to be a high
cost to reward venture anyway or Midway for that matter. No attack on
Port Moresby which I don't think has any resources anyway.

Is this workable or would it be too conservative?
User avatar
paullus99
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Japan Strategy Q

Post by paullus99 »

I've seen it work both ways - aggressive Japan can work if you able to limit the US' ability to supply a lunge across the Pacific & Germany keeps Britain occupied in Europe. Even a conservative Japan can make inroads into Australia & India if the Western Allies aren't paying enough attention to the developing situation.
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...
User avatar
mbatch729
Posts: 534
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 8:00 am
Location: North Carolina

RE: Japan Strategy Q

Post by mbatch729 »

Mavramm: I was wondering, were you a battleship sailor too? Saw your portrait, my ship's photo. Just curious. (BB-61, 88 - 90, FA Division)
Later,
FC3(SW) Batch
USS Iowa
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's World at War”