How about it Hard Sarge?

Crown of Glory: Europe in the Age of Napoleon, the player controls one of the crowned potentates of Europe in the Napoleonic Era, wielding authority over his nation's military strategy, economic development, diplomatic relations, and social organization. It is a very thorough simulation of the entire Napoleonic Era - spanning from 1799 to 1820, from the dockyards in Lisbon to the frozen wastes of Holy Mother Russia.

Moderators: ericbabe, Gil R.

Post Reply
Grand_Armee
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:18 am

How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by Grand_Armee »

Hey, Devil-Dog! Is that Naples bug still going on in the upgrade you're beta-testing?
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by Hard Sarge »

Not sure, which part are you asking about ?

I in the middle of fighting Naples for it right now, but my game is on hold till the next update

Spain had it, I attacked it, Spain, liberated it, and now I DOW and am wearing them down

there are still some Provinces that are shaky for some reason, but Eric is trying to nail them down

Image
User avatar
ericbabe
Posts: 11848
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 3:57 am
Contact:

RE: How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by ericbabe »

The new behavior in 1.2 we're experimenting with for multi-provinced minors is to have the capital of the minor country move to a new territory upon liberation of part of the multi-provinced minor.

Let me give an example: Austria starts with a protectorate over the minor country Veneto. Veneto owns two provinces, Venetia and Illyria. Say Austria surrenders to France and France forces Austria to liberate Illyria. The new behavior is that Illyria becomes an independent province under Veneto. The province of Venetia becomes conquered by Austria. The capital of the country Veneto moves from now-conquered Venetia to the now-independent province of Illyria.

This new behavior seems to solve many of the old issues involving Illyria/Venetia; though we haven't been able to test every case, so far it seems to be a vast improvement over the former behavior.

Image
Naomi
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: Osaka

RE: How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by Naomi »

What a nice change it is!
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by Hard Sarge »

Hey Eric
for that screwy Ventero or what the hey it name is

isn't Cofu part of it also ??????


boy and what a rotton piece of land that is !!!

(hope there are no Cofuians looking over the forum)

Image
Naomi
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: Osaka

RE: How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by Naomi »

(~_~) { Really.
Mathusalem
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:49 pm

RE: Corfu

Post by Mathusalem »

Well, Corfu is not the smaller province in the game: it is larger than Gibraltar. It changed hands many times at this time: from Venitian to French in 1997, Russian between 1799 and 1807, French again till 1814, then British, and it finally became part of Greece in 1864.
Grand_Armee
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:18 am

RE: Bavaria

Post by Grand_Armee »

Bavaria is another one that is giving trouble. Once somebody else has them as a protectorate, I can't gain control over one province. It's a different one each time: Kleves, Berg, Nuremburg. The only way for me to get them all is to either gain them as a protectorate, or to coup them very early.

If I fail at the coup, I'm forever stuck with somebody else in Prussianized Germany. Bavaria must have a huge anti-Prussia modifier. I just never have enough cash to bribe them into loving me.
User avatar
ericbabe
Posts: 11848
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 3:57 am
Contact:

RE: How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by ericbabe »

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

Hey Eric
for that screwy Ventero or what the hey it name is

isn't Cofu part of it also ??????

boy and what a rotton piece of land that is !!!

(hope there are no Cofuians looking over the forum)

Depends on the scenario. By the 1805 scenario the Russians owned Corfu.

Here's the history of Corfu under Venetian hegemony:
http://www.corfuweb.gr/gb-history6.htm

And a bit about the Russian invasion of Corfu in 1799:
http://www.neva.ru/EXPO96/book/chap6-1.html

The article mentions a treaty to allow the Russians to use the Dardanelles. This was one of COG's treaty clause ideas that didn't make the final cut.

One rule I've always wanted to add is to give a combat bonus to a nation during a naval action if that nation controls a port adjacent to the sea zone containing the naval action. This would make controlling places like Malta and Corfu even more useful.
Image
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by carnifex »

This would make controlling places like Malta and Corfu even more useful.

They are already super useful because of the harsh sea supply rules. God forbid you need to ship some units from Gibraltar to Egypt and you don't hold any ports in-between.
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: How about it Hard Sarge?

Post by Hard Sarge »

Roger on the time line Eric

I normally play with the 1792 War, so I am used to seeing it another way

hmmm, sort of like the Port idea, but would make the English Channel nasty

maybe a sliding scale, for the bonus, depending on how large the port is ?

I mean, I believe France and England would both share the same sea zone, so both would get the bonus, but if one of them owned the Dutch port, then that would give a extra bonus

I like it, I like it

LOL I think you see how my mind works
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Crown of Glory”