NikMod errata list

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

NikMod errata list

Post by Nikademus »

I'm collecting information on boo boos for the next release version. Stuff collected so far listed below. If any users have found other boo boos, (such as inconsistancies between scn's 40 and 45, please list them here. I'll modify the list as I go.

****

1. scenario#45 (42A may start)

Location ID: 136 (7th Air Force) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 137 (10th Air Force) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 138 (11th Air Force) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 145 (223 Group RAF) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 146 (224 Group RAF) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 147 (225 Group RAF) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 159 (US III Corps) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 160 (US IX Corps) - no location set at start of scenario

2. Verify availability of latewar models:

P-51B
B7A Grace

3. The Spitfire Vc's are also in error....they begin deployment in 11/43, not 7/43 The Oz Spit Vb/c squadrons deploy in 42. I suppose.....I can find a slot for them and give a very limited production (something like 5 a month)

4. 42A (Scenario 45) the replacement rate for the Boomerang is 140

5. Kittyhawk MVR out of sync with P40E

6. The mine dispenser of the class O19 is in the wrong slot in scenario #40. Correction:
The class is correct, but the ships (O19 O20) themselves are wrong. They just need to be refreshed.

7 Scn 45 - duplicate AVG's (AVG and 23rd FG)

8. Beufort/Beufighter.

9. China ENG bases (radar)

ckk
Posts: 1241
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Pensacola Beach FL

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by ckk »

Nik

Remember the Boomerang replacement rate[;)]
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by Nikademus »

refresh my memory. Its not what it used to me.

Image
ckk
Posts: 1241
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Pensacola Beach FL

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by ckk »

At least in 42A the replacement rate for the Boomerang is 240[&:]
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by Nikademus »

ah yes. thx

keep em coming

ckk
Posts: 1241
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Pensacola Beach FL

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by ckk »

No problema You know I will[:D]
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12463
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by michaelm75au »

The mine dispenser of the class O19 is in the wrong slot in scenario #40.

The mine dispenser must be in slot #2 for mine replenishment/loading to work.
It is correct in scenario #45.

This was a change made in 1.6 when minelaying subs were fixed. The Dutch class had the mine dispenser in the wrong slot and it was corrected then.

Correction:
The class is correct, but the ships (O19 O20) themselves are wrong. They just need to be refreshed.
Michael
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by Nikademus »

bump for me
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6429
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: ckk

At least in 42A the replacement rate for the Boomerang is 240[&:]

Does this problem keep coming back ??[8D]
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by Nikademus »

apparantly....we should have went with WPK instead of WPO....

(War Plan Kangeroo)

build a fence around Oz....no threat of invasion....no Spitfires....no Beuforts....no Beufighters....no Boomerangs.....ah....peace for the modder...... [:D]
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6429
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: NikMod errata list

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

apparantly....we should have went with WPK instead of WPO....

(War Plan Kangeroo)

build a fence around Oz....no threat of invasion....no Spitfires....no Beauforts....no Beaufighters....no Boomerangs.....ah....peace for the modder...... [:D]

WE got a Dingo fence, a Rabbit fence, why not a Jap Fence to keep them out, or at least in Queensland.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”