Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by String »



*clickety click*

I also took the liberty of copying the article from there before it gets changed.
The Aichi D1A was a dive bomber produced by the Aichi company in Japan. The Imperial Japanese Navy issued a design specification for a biplane divebomber to support naval and land operations via carrier soon after the infamous Manchurian Incident, a Japanese set-up, in 1931. The Aichi D1A, as it was called, was not an authentic Japanese product, but like all Japanese goods, was copied and changed marginally from superior foreign models, in this case, the Aichi company arranged for a Heinkel 70 to be imported from Germany, and after a careless study, simply replaced the Benz engine with a Nakajima Hikari system and called the plane their own creation. The Navy, in any case, eagerly accepted the design for mass production as it needed desperately a carrier borne aircraft to support their imperialistic designs on innocent Nationalist China. These designs were realised in the Tanaka Memorial, an authentic document for Japanese domination in the Pacific, including the planned Japanese invasion of China, Russia, the United States, and South East Asia, including Australia. The Japanese, predictably, called the document a forgery, but there are those that know far better. In any case, after the first step of the Tanaka Memorial had been undertaken in 1931(see Manchurian Incident), in 1932, the Imperial Japanese government approved further 'expeditions' into China, this included the use of the D1A. So in 1932, a Japanese naval taskforce steamed to the shores of Shanghai, a city of Chinese millions, and let loose a naval bombardment. While Japanese battleships aimed to pulverise the docksides, a sprawling civilian area bustling with crowded markets, hotels, fishing villages, and apartments, the Japanese carriers, Kaga, Akagi and Hosho launched swarms of D1As to assault the then inland Weiping civilian area that was beyond the range of the murderous Japanese battleships. The D1As wrought havoc, relentlessly bombing the crowded streets, strafing inumerous packs of humanity in downtown Shanghai,in one case, an elementary school overflowing with panicking children and teachers, as well as refugees fleeing from the docksides, was especially eyed out and aimed at by the Japanese planes which were believed to be encouraged by supposed flight commander Yatari Naguchi,to aim specifically for crowded civilian targets. The D1As, in accordance,dived down several 250 kg bombs, all of which were either direct hits on the large school, or were near misses, causing bloody shrapnel fatalities. Along the docksides, there was almost nothing left from the bombardment of the Japanese battleships, the entire waterfront area of Shanghai had been flattened, leaving only bloody debris and mounds of incinerated bodies. The D1As, en route to their carriers, after their savage work had been completed in inland and downtown Shanghai, gunned down anything that moved along these flattened docksides, including numbers of dazed children, having miraculously survived the naval bombardment after originally going down to the docksides to play. This orgy, arrogantly called by the Japanese as the Shanghai Incident( also see Shantung Incident,a similar prequel to the Manchurian and Shanghai Incidents, and evidence of long-standing Japanese Expansionism), was ignored by the West. A similar and far more intense form of obliteration, was to be repeated by the Japanese, on the same city, on the same people, the innocent Chinese, in 1937, when hordes of Japanese Mitsubishi G3M 'Nell' bombers flew from Japanese invaded Taiwan, in conjunction with the D1As successor, the Aichi D3A 'Val' to again bring fiery terror on the defenceless city of Shanghai. After this time however, the D1A( codenamed 'Susie') having been replaced by the Val on carriers, was still in land based service, and after the Japanese armies spread into China, leaving behind a trail of innocent blood and destruction, the D1As,would provide 'air cover', a term in the Susie's case as indiscriminate and unchallenged bombardment of peaceful villages, and strafing of farmers at work in the fields when the planes were flying on patrol. During the siege of Nanking, (today's Nanjing) Susies again, gave the city similar treatment as Shanghai,murderous air raids on the city that were to prelude the ghastly and utterly inhumane Rape of Nanking, a massacre carried out by inhuman, barbaric Japanese soldiers. D1As, also without warning, bombed and sank the U.S. gunboat, the Panay, which was evacuating innocent American Nationals down the Yan. Causing casualties and deaths among the crew and passengers. The Panay was the first U.S. warship to go down in the Pacific War at the hands of the common, Japanese enemy, even before the Arizona and her sisters that were criminally struck by the Japanese Navy at the foul raid on Pearl Harbour. After Pearl Harbour, the Susies saw limited action, as it was increasingly becoming obsolete, and was used mainly as a divebombing trainer, and a support craft. In one forgotten case, a squadron of training Susies, practiced divebombing accuracy with live and explosive bombs using a small internment camp for European (British and Dutch) and ethnic Chinese women as a target, in the Indies (Indonesia). This had unknown results, although it is believed most were direct hits. The D1A was finally declared obsolescent supposedly in 1944.

Can someone more knowledgeable rewrite that article so it would be more about the plane and less about the horrors of sino-japanese war. There's a place for everything and that article isn't one for it.
Surface combat TF fanboy
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by wild_Willie2 »

[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D] Replace "Japanese" with " American" and Lt calley could have written this [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
Ideologue
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:33 am

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Ideologue »

Nothing says "accuracy" like "single deranged block paragraph."
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Who wrote this drivel? Well, just goes to show the problem with the Wiki concept; anyone can write anything...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Alikchi2 »

Ah, but anyone can fix it. [:)]

*click*
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by el cid again »

Note the part about "all Japanese products" are just copies of "superior foreign models." There were Japanese planes in the 1930s so secret everything was destroyed - even the plans - so the concepts they worked on would not be leakable. There were Japanese planes in the same era that set world records. For a rather comprehensive picture of the aviation industry in that period, see Japanese Aircraft, 1910-1941. It deliberately omits anything covered by Francillon - so the two books compliment rather than duplicate.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Speedysteve »

[:D]
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Brady »


WoW! thats insane, If I had time I could write a decent, though porly spelled[:)] History on the D1A, but do another search and I am shure you will find a good referance for it.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Iridium »

Just looks like the PRC started rewriting history to fit their POV in Wiki earlier than we did. Quick, start making articles filled with our biased information in Wiki to even out the playing field!
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by mdiehl »

That Wiki entry is... stunningly... breathtakingly... nuts!
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
User avatar
aletoledo
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:51 pm
Contact:

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by aletoledo »

I assume someone edited it out, I don't see that commentary on it, just the stats are there.
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Alikchi2 »

I removed the vandalism. [:)]
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Nikademus »

this Wiki site....i take it anyone can post anything to this encyclopedia?
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Speedysteve »

Yup......even the likes of you
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Nikademus »

lol.....i've seen a number of threads posting links to this "Wiki" along with terms such as "See? this proves it!!!"

Now i know not to bother clicking on them. [;)]
User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by String »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

lol.....i've seen a number of threads posting links to this "Wiki" along with terms such as "See? this proves it!!!"

Now i know not to bother clicking on them. [;)]
well, the information is correct 99% of the time, especially on more frequented subjects.
Surface combat TF fanboy
User avatar
Demosthenes
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Demosthenes »

ORIGINAL: String



*clickety click*


Can someone more knowledgeable rewrite that article so it would be more about the plane and less about the horrors of sino-japanese war. There's a place for everything and that article isn't one for it.

Yah, it did go straight from The D1A to the Japanese atrocities (opening round) in China...
BaitBoy
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 5:01 pm

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by BaitBoy »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

lol.....i've seen a number of threads posting links to this "Wiki" along with terms such as "See? this proves it!!!"

Now i know not to bother clicking on them. [;)]

A study was done comparing Wiki to Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica won but not by much.

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a ... 80410/1012
"You go over there and attract their attention while I . . . "

Member Henchmen and Sidekicks Local 272
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: Bait Boy

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

lol.....i've seen a number of threads posting links to this "Wiki" along with terms such as "See? this proves it!!!"

Now i know not to bother clicking on them. [;)]

A study was done comparing Wiki to Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica won but not by much.

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a ... 80410/1012

Believe you are in error. The "study" said that Wiki held it's own in "Science" issues. Which makes sense, as ongoing discoveries and developments can make their way into Wikpedia overnight rather than in a couple of years. On History subjects, the overnight "latest word" can just as often be a crock of BS qabout how the Holocaust didn't happen. Anybody with an axe to grind can jump in with an opinion---one that doesn't have to undergo peer review or learned scrutiny.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Aichi D1A Susie in Wikipedia

Post by m10bob »

It was written by a news writer for ABC, PMSNBC, or CBS..
(Weekend writer for the New York Times)..
Agendas.........................
Image

Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”