Eng. Vs Eng.

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
NemRod
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 8:53 am

Eng. Vs Eng.

Post by NemRod »

Attacking engineers can reduce forts even at 0 to 1 odds.Can they counter this reduction when on defence? In other words, is it a good idea to put combat eng. on a base you are defending expecting they will help to slow down the fort level reduction?
Thanks.
Top
User avatar
saj42
Posts: 1129
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Somerset, England

RE: Eng. Vs Eng.

Post by saj42 »

Combat engineers only aid assualt NOT defense.
You can't slow down fort reduction - enough construction engineers and supplies would rebuild forts - but not as fast.
Image
Banner by rogueusmc
Top
User avatar
rogueusmc
Posts: 4583
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:21 pm
Location: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Contact:
Contact rogueusmc

RE: Eng. Vs Eng.

Post by rogueusmc »

Engineers are better at demo of the base if it is taken...
There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army

Image
Top
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”