
Who wants to fly this
Moderators: Joel Billings, simovitch, harley, warshipbuilder
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
RE: Who wants to fly this
what no takers ?
if I not mistaken, that is the plane that got the first GB air kill of the war !
knocked down a Ju 88, odd part is the Ju 88 was faster
oh well
well then how about this

if I not mistaken, that is the plane that got the first GB air kill of the war !
knocked down a Ju 88, odd part is the Ju 88 was faster

oh well
well then how about this

- Attachments
-
- Spit.jpg (3.35 KiB) Viewed 288 times

- Capt Cliff
- Posts: 1713
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 4:48 pm
- Location: Northwest, USA
RE: Who wants to fly this
Where's the T-Bolt? When you absolutely have to take something to take into combat, and can be sure to make it home!
Capt. Cliff
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:46 pm
RE: Who wants to fly this
Hard
I think you may be wrong. That aircraft is Blacburn Roc which is a turret fighter version of the Blackburn Skua - a sort of naval rival to the Boulton Paul Defiant, but a lot slower.
I think the first kill might have been by a Blackburn Skua, which was primarily a dive bomber but was also used as a fighter at times. The irony is that the Skua was about 20mph faster than the Roc
Dave
I think you may be wrong. That aircraft is Blacburn Roc which is a turret fighter version of the Blackburn Skua - a sort of naval rival to the Boulton Paul Defiant, but a lot slower.
I think the first kill might have been by a Blackburn Skua, which was primarily a dive bomber but was also used as a fighter at times. The irony is that the Skua was about 20mph faster than the Roc
Dave
RE: Who wants to fly this
Yeah, the Skua got the first confirmed FAA kill of the war.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
RE: Who wants to fly this
Sorry Had it backwards
but still, both are butt ugly, and slower then the planes they were facing
but still, both are butt ugly, and slower then the planes they were facing


- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
RE: Who wants to fly this
more planes, only a mother could love


- Attachments
-
- ju86.jpg (2.6 KiB) Viewed 286 times

-
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:38 pm
- Location: Bristol, UK
RE: Who wants to fly this
Nah - you haven't even got close to ugly yet...Hampden, Whitley are both not pretty, and if you go beyond BTR, try the Boulton Paul Overstrand (left service 1940-1 so almost counts!). But my personal favourite - the Baracuda.
Of course, some of the interwar flying boats...
Of course, some of the interwar flying boats...
I have a cunning plan, My Lord
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 15974
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Reading, England
RE: Who wants to fly this
Give me the Westland Whirlwind II anyday!
MJT
MJT
"My God, I hope you don't blame me for this. I had no idea where you were."
Air Vice-marshal Pulford upon the loss of "Force Z"
Air Vice-marshal Pulford upon the loss of "Force Z"
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
RE: Who wants to fly this
I confused
I only got a Mk1 and a Mk1a
?

I only got a Mk1 and a Mk1a
?

- Attachments
-
- Whirlwind_5.jpg (81.46 KiB) Viewed 277 times

- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
RE: Who wants to fly this
of course, some people have no taste


- Attachments
-
- whirlwind.jpg (3.11 KiB) Viewed 276 times

- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
RE: Who wants to fly this
of course, some people like to use skill when they fly


- Attachments
-
- avia_16.jpg (44.96 KiB) Viewed 276 times

RE: Who wants to fly this
Of course, some people should get around to releasing these games toute suite![;)]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
RE: Who wants to fly this
<agrees with Terminus>
I just bought BII to keep me busy while I wait !!!!
Come on guys hurry up !!!![:D][:D][:D]
I just bought BII to keep me busy while I wait !!!!
Come on guys hurry up !!!![:D][:D][:D]
RE: Who wants to fly this
The Westland Whrilwind MkII
In December 1940 production of the Peregrine engine was due to be stopped!
By January 1941 Westland had done some redesign work to allow 2 x Merlin 20 Engines to be fitted to the airframe.
These would of given the aircraft Outstanding Performance. The estimates for this performance are as Follows:-
Top speed 410mph
Service Ceiling 37,000ft
Range 800miles
Given that the modifactions to fit merlin 20 engines were mainly to sort out undercarriage retraction problems it appears this Version could well of been in service mid to late 1941!
How well would they done flying against the Fw 190 is hard to say but it would of being intresting.
There was even talk of a Whirlwind with an American Engine (Alison Engine?)
As it was the Westland Whirlwind II never went into Production The powers that be felt that the new Hawker Fighter with six 20mm Cannon and a single engine was a better bet.
The Name of this Great Hawker Fighter was the Typhoon and it never did fly with six cannons.
Most of this information was taken from The Westland Whirlwind Fighter by Victor Bingham.
MJT
In December 1940 production of the Peregrine engine was due to be stopped!
By January 1941 Westland had done some redesign work to allow 2 x Merlin 20 Engines to be fitted to the airframe.
These would of given the aircraft Outstanding Performance. The estimates for this performance are as Follows:-
Top speed 410mph
Service Ceiling 37,000ft
Range 800miles
Given that the modifactions to fit merlin 20 engines were mainly to sort out undercarriage retraction problems it appears this Version could well of been in service mid to late 1941!
How well would they done flying against the Fw 190 is hard to say but it would of being intresting.
There was even talk of a Whirlwind with an American Engine (Alison Engine?)
As it was the Westland Whirlwind II never went into Production The powers that be felt that the new Hawker Fighter with six 20mm Cannon and a single engine was a better bet.
The Name of this Great Hawker Fighter was the Typhoon and it never did fly with six cannons.
Most of this information was taken from The Westland Whirlwind Fighter by Victor Bingham.
MJT
"My God, I hope you don't blame me for this. I had no idea where you were."
Air Vice-marshal Pulford upon the loss of "Force Z"
Air Vice-marshal Pulford upon the loss of "Force Z"
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
RE: Who wants to fly this
Okay, I follow now
I had the figher model and the fighter bomber model, that is why I was confused by the Mk II
another one that got to make you shake your head, was the P-38 with merlins, the test model was great, and it was figured out it would take about 2 weeks to reset the production lines, the higher ups figured they needed the 2 weeks production more then they needed a better plane type !
I had the figher model and the fighter bomber model, that is why I was confused by the Mk II
another one that got to make you shake your head, was the P-38 with merlins, the test model was great, and it was figured out it would take about 2 weeks to reset the production lines, the higher ups figured they needed the 2 weeks production more then they needed a better plane type !
