Who wants to fly this

Eagle Day to Bombing of the Reich is a improved and enhanced edition of Talonsoft's older Battle of Britain and Bombing the Reich. This updated version represents the best simulation of the air war over Britain and the strategic bombing campaign over Europe that has ever been made.

Moderators: Joel Billings, simovitch, harley, warshipbuilder

User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

Yuck



Image
Attachments
yuck.jpg
yuck.jpg (3.99 KiB) Viewed 307 times
Image
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

what no takers ?

if I not mistaken, that is the plane that got the first GB air kill of the war !

knocked down a Ju 88, odd part is the Ju 88 was faster :)

oh well

well then how about this



Image
Attachments
Spit.jpg
Spit.jpg (3.35 KiB) Viewed 288 times
Image
User avatar
Capt Cliff
Posts: 1713
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 4:48 pm
Location: Northwest, USA

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Capt Cliff »

Where's the T-Bolt? When you absolutely have to take something to take into combat, and can be sure to make it home!
Capt. Cliff
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

I not got a view of one of those yet :)

Image
daveballmh
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:46 pm

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by daveballmh »

Hard

I think you may be wrong. That aircraft is Blacburn Roc which is a turret fighter version of the Blackburn Skua - a sort of naval rival to the Boulton Paul Defiant, but a lot slower.

I think the first kill might have been by a Blackburn Skua, which was primarily a dive bomber but was also used as a fighter at times. The irony is that the Skua was about 20mph faster than the Roc

Dave
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Terminus »

Yeah, the Skua got the first confirmed FAA kill of the war.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

Sorry Had it backwards

but still, both are butt ugly, and slower then the planes they were facing :)

Image
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

more planes, only a mother could love

Image
Attachments
ju86.jpg
ju86.jpg (2.6 KiB) Viewed 286 times
Image
HMSWarspite
Posts: 1404
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by HMSWarspite »

Nah - you haven't even got close to ugly yet...Hampden, Whitley are both not pretty, and if you go beyond BTR, try the Boulton Paul Overstrand (left service 1940-1 so almost counts!). But my personal favourite - the Baracuda.

Of course, some of the interwar flying boats...
I have a cunning plan, My Lord
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

Twins

Image
Attachments
twins.jpg
twins.jpg (6.85 KiB) Viewed 278 times
Image
Speedysteve
Posts: 15974
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Speedysteve »

Aren't they pretty[8D]
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
langley
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: Newbury, Berkshire, England.

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by langley »

Give me the Westland Whirlwind II anyday!

MJT
"My God, I hope you don't blame me for this. I had no idea where you were."
Air Vice-marshal Pulford upon the loss of "Force Z"
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

I confused
I only got a Mk1 and a Mk1a

?

Image
Attachments
Whirlwind_5.jpg
Whirlwind_5.jpg (81.46 KiB) Viewed 277 times
Image
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

now here is a pretty one



Image
Attachments
2005.jpg
2005.jpg (3.08 KiB) Viewed 278 times
Image
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

of course, some people have no taste

Image
Attachments
whirlwind.jpg
whirlwind.jpg (3.11 KiB) Viewed 276 times
Image
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

of course, some people like to use skill when they fly

Image
Attachments
avia_16.jpg
avia_16.jpg (44.96 KiB) Viewed 276 times
Image
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Terminus »

Of course, some people should get around to releasing these games toute suite![;)]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Andy Mac
Posts: 12577
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Andy Mac »

<agrees with Terminus>

I just bought BII to keep me busy while I wait !!!!

Come on guys hurry up !!!![:D][:D][:D]
User avatar
langley
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: Newbury, Berkshire, England.

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by langley »

The Westland Whrilwind MkII

In December 1940 production of the Peregrine engine was due to be stopped!
By January 1941 Westland had done some redesign work to allow 2 x Merlin 20 Engines to be fitted to the airframe.

These would of given the aircraft Outstanding Performance. The estimates for this performance are as Follows:-
Top speed 410mph
Service Ceiling 37,000ft
Range 800miles

Given that the modifactions to fit merlin 20 engines were mainly to sort out undercarriage retraction problems it appears this Version could well of been in service mid to late 1941!

How well would they done flying against the Fw 190 is hard to say but it would of being intresting.

There was even talk of a Whirlwind with an American Engine (Alison Engine?)

As it was the Westland Whirlwind II never went into Production The powers that be felt that the new Hawker Fighter with six 20mm Cannon and a single engine was a better bet.

The Name of this Great Hawker Fighter was the Typhoon and it never did fly with six cannons.

Most of this information was taken from The Westland Whirlwind Fighter by Victor Bingham.

MJT
"My God, I hope you don't blame me for this. I had no idea where you were."
Air Vice-marshal Pulford upon the loss of "Force Z"
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Who wants to fly this

Post by Hard Sarge »

Okay, I follow now

I had the figher model and the fighter bomber model, that is why I was confused by the Mk II

another one that got to make you shake your head, was the P-38 with merlins, the test model was great, and it was figured out it would take about 2 weeks to reset the production lines, the higher ups figured they needed the 2 weeks production more then they needed a better plane type !

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich”