japanese radar again

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

japanese radar again

Post by Sneer »

i know that early japanese radar type doesn't work
question is which type works ?
if any ?
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: japanese radar again

Post by pauk »

type 13 i think... the Type 13, which was an air-search radar, is defined in the game as a surface-search radar..
Image
Speedysteve
Posts: 15980
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Speedysteve »

Correct. My god Pauk you do know something then[:'(]
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Big B »

That was one of the questions I asked a week or two ago -

But more to the point, I didn't think the game distinguished between air search and surface search radars - only surface vs airborne radars (for use in aircraft)?[&:]

B
ORIGINAL: pauk

type 13 i think... the Type 13, which was an air-search radar, is defined in the game as a surface-search radar..
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Sneer »

so type 13 has problems and 21 and 22 are ok ?
Speedysteve
Posts: 15980
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Speedysteve »

Yes AFAIK
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: japanese radar again

Post by pauk »

that is how i see things...

don't know anything about what B said...
Image
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: pauk

that is how i see things...

don't know anything about what B said...
I think the Database only defines radars as "surface radar" (such as SCR270 and XCAM) and "aircraft radar".. which will be mounted in aircraft, and thereby are "airborne radar".

B

User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: japanese radar again

Post by pauk »

hmm.... i know that air radars helps against air raids, allowing early warning and thus more planes on CAP - at least i have been told so....
Image
User avatar
Honda
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 5:15 pm
Location: Karlovac, Croatia

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Honda »

Yeah, and when Jap BFs get their sound detectors "upgraded" to Type13s, Jap bases get less CAP then before, so more planes left to be bombed to smitherine
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: pauk

type 13 i think... the Type 13, which was an air-search radar, is defined in the game as a surface-search radar..
Ok, had time to look this up. There is nothing wrong with Japanese Type 13 RADAR.
It is defined as surface radar - but virtually ALL radar is surface radar in the game - except those designated as aircraft radar...which is only meant to be carried aboard aircraft.

B

Image
Attachments
radar.jpg
radar.jpg (88.28 KiB) Viewed 404 times
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Brady »

My understanding is that NO aircraft cary radar in game that works as intended, for surface search, that is for use in detecting ships/subs.
 
.........
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: Brady

My understanding is that NO aircraft cary radar in game that works as intended, for surface search, that is for use in detecting ships/subs.

.........
Well, all I can tell you is that again, every RADAR that is an air-search radar (like SCR270 or XCAM, or even SC and SJ) is defined as surface radar.

Maybe NONE of them work - but they are all the same.

EDIT: So I suspect that the surface radar classification works as an air search radar for any unit so equiped. There is definately nothing different between Allied and Japanese radars on this matter.

B
User avatar
stonefoot
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 2:44 am

RE: japanese radar again

Post by stonefoot »

My understanding is that the problem with the Type 13 is that they forgot to give it a penetration factor like the other radars for detecting aircraft. Thats why when a Jap BF upgrades from sound detectors to radar they get worse at raid detection since the sound detectors have a better penetration rating.
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Mynok »


Radar (no matter what kind) that have no penetration value will not search for aircraft.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: stonefoot

My understanding is that the problem with the Type 13 is that they forgot to give it a penetration factor like the other radars for detecting aircraft. Thats why when a Jap BF upgrades from sound detectors to radar they get worse at raid detection since the sound detectors have a better penetration rating.
ORIGINAL: Mynok


Radar (no matter what kind) that have no penetration value will not search for aircraft.

Well there you may well be correct - because a quick check revealed no penetration value for Japanes RADAR [&:]
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Big B »

Well your pleas have not fallen on deaf ears. In the soon to be posted "B Mod" all Japanese RADAR problems will be addressed [;)]

EDIT: Ok, which Japanese RADARS are supposed to be Air Search RADAR, and which, if any, are supposed to be surface search only RADAR - such as American SC RADAR?

Well, it looks like the only RADAR we are talking about here is Type 13, so....


B
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: japanese radar again

Post by Brady »

 
Referance:
 
 
http://www.combinedfleet.com/radar.htm
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
FeurerKrieg
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Denver, CO

RE: japanese radar again

Post by FeurerKrieg »

Penetration for radar is simply a flag. 0 means it detects surface units 500 means it detects air units.
The aircraft/surface classification only refers to where the radar is mounted. (Surface is on ships and LCU, air is aircraft).

There was a fix posted from michael that would update the database but it of course does not work on games in progress.

Image
Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: japanese radar again

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Feurer Krieg

Penetration for radar is simply a flag. 0 means it detects surface units 500 means it detects air units.
The aircraft/surface classification only refers to where the radar is mounted. (Surface is on ships and LCU, air is aircraft).

There was a fix posted from michael that would update the database but it of course does not work on games in progress.


Why is it so hard to update ongoing games? I just wonder.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”