CHS Jap Aircraft Production

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
DaveCA
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:43 pm

CHS Jap Aircraft Production

Post by DaveCA »

Hello,
I was wondering if any of you might be able to give me some tips as how to set my aircraft production ( PDU on ) in the CHS 155 senario. I have been searching the forums and spooky's site but am having a hard time figuring it all out. I bought this game over a year ago but due to RL I havent been able to devote the time to it that it seems to need ( * blames the wife *).

Thanks.
SamCole
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:38 pm

RE: CHS Jap Aircraft Production

Post by SamCole »

ORIGINAL: DaveCA

Hello,
I was wondering if any of you might be able to give me some tips as how to set my aircraft production ( PDU on ) in the CHS 155 senario. I have been searching the forums and spooky's site but am having a hard time figuring it all out. I bought this game over a year ago but due to RL I havent been able to devote the time to it that it seems to need ( * blames the wife *).

Thanks.

Do not let her read that. [:)]
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: CHS Jap Aircraft Production

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Despitethe best efforts of CHS, nobody can change thge utter BS that is the Japanese economic system...completer garbage. Guess what I'm saying is do the same crud as one would in the stocl scenario!
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12472
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: CHS Jap Aircraft Production

Post by Sardaukar »

ORIGINAL: DaveCA

I bought this game over a year ago but due to RL I havent been able to devote the time to it that it seems to need ( * blames the wife *).

Thanks.

Don't worry. If you devote *enough* time to WitP, you soon don'thave wife !! [:D] So dilemma is solved...[;)]

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
shoevarek
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 9:21 pm

RE: CHS Jap Aircraft Production

Post by shoevarek »

I guess it all depends who do you play against. I am only casual gamer and limit myself to abusing AI. In order to win against it you probably don't have to move a finger. I tinker with production mostly because I always liked economy in games.

I change research of all types I don't like (because they are crappy aircrafts, have better counterparts, look ugly or I am just not good at using them [8|]) to the types I like.
From the beginning of the game I start the rd of:
a) Ki61I - the workhorse of the army air, can compete with allied planes and can be had quite early
b) Ki84a - 2nd generation of the army aircraft
c) N1K1 - 1st generation of the land navy aircraft that can compete with allied planes
d) A7M2 - because I like to think I will have carriers to put them on
e) B7 and D7 - see point d. They also have better durability so maybe few of them will manage to go through the allied flak.
f) I do not speed up later Zero types. AI looses all carriers quickly (before Hllcats come to play). Besides the differences between types are not so huge to justify rd.

After first generation come up I turn on N1K2 and Ki61II - although this is contardicting my standardizing efforts

I give up on the following:
a) Ki43 - during the beginning A6M2 will do all the dirty work and after mid 42 Ki61 will be ready
b) Ki44 - game parameters do not justify its production over Ki61
c) Jill - not enough value to speed it up.
d) Ki27, Ki51, Ki30, Jacks, Irvings, Ki45 (other than naight fighter), A6M8, Ki83, all transports (apart L2D2), naval recons (i keep only 2 types) - i do not even intend producing it. I keep few dozens of Ki32 Mary as it is the only type that links crappy Ki51 and Ki30 with more usefull LB branch like Ki21, Ki48, Ki67 etc. (PDU glich)
e) I do not rd Betty, Frances, Ki67 - those are offensive weapons and in the later stages of the war better fighters are priority.

Limiting number of types produced has disadvantage that you may not get all scheduled air groups. However playing against AI this is not the problem. I found multitude of air groups scarry - having less air groups I seem to be abe to better manage every one of them. And less units sits idle in Home Islands.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”