<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: markhwalker<br/>
<br/>
I won't put too much stock in the server stats. <e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Unfortunately this is true - somehow a Lock'N Load bug, cause I didn't notice this effect with other games yet.<br/>
But I can see me online, when I am ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>When Spotting, does the whole stack of units spot check at once, or can each individual counter try and Spot the enemy? For example, 2 MMC and a SMC are in a stack. Can the SMC try and Spot, if it fails be placed under an Ops Complete marker, then next turn, have one of ...

<r> Well, whoever likes it can do it.<br/>
<br/>
I am not sure whether it makes a big difference to put some game of Memory into LnL too.<br/>
<br/>
Maybe it would make some kind of difference, when the forces would start the game as numbered markers with corresponding boxes aside - hidden from ...

For he's a jolly good fellow, Which nobody can deny.
Awesome job Billyboy! [&o]

would have played through it by now.

Huh? How? Is it available somewhere? Am I blind?

Hey - looks cool.

<t> I really do love that rule.<br/>
<br/>
Beside that - some squads are able to try to rally before Melee occours. That simulates this "I fight before I die/surrender" pretty nice, doesn't it?<br/>
<br/>
In general - how I see it here:<br/>
From Shaken to 'removed' doesnt necessarily mean: KIA ...

Hm - map A and B a quiet small, while C looks ok - do I miss somethng? (Look becomes ugly, when enlarged via graphic program)

<t> And that is something, what someone who has a life and just want to enjoy a game doesn't do anyways - seriously: never had a game... and had some on Virtual Lock'N Load with different peoples, who started with 'every hex checks'. You do that when in doubt and that is not as often, as it might ...

IF ever anyone would see a need for this in/out of season things - they could do it via SSR, huh?
Maybe one might even come up with dense coniferous forest: 3 MPs ... but afforested, so only 0.5 level high - blocks only at same level - whatever

<r> ad 1 - all correct beside 13C3... but I guess that's a typo.<br/>
<br/>
ad 2 - sorry, no scenario cards around<br/>
<br/>
ad3 - basically the designer can only tell "why". But imagine trees, with all their leaves... they cause somehow a blocking shild in that curtain angle. Makes sense? <E ...

<t> Per definition, you are allowed to check LOS without penalties all the time.<br/>
<br/>
Something I personally prefer.<br/>
Anyways - both ways can be 'odd'.<br/>
Way 1 - you play with a guy who checks all important LOSs before he moves 1 hex;<br/>
Way 2 - you play with someone, who learned ...

<r> Yes, it is a great game <E>:)</E> ... but, do you know the game now, or not? hm - anyways: judge it by yourself. There are enough screenshots aroun already - either here, at <URL url="http://www.locknloadgame.com">www.locknloadgame.com</URL> or <URL url="http://www.boardgamegeek.com">www ...

<r> For Spotting:<br/>
Units that didn't take any action what causes attention (like firing, moving, being in melee) and in a degrading or blocking terrain - they need to be spotted before someone can harm them. <br/>
<br/>
For that "adjacent" thing: If one of your units is good order and ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Adam Parker<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Why is a unit adjacent to bocage spotted? Because (going on the demo rules I have) a unit is "automatically spotted" if adjacent.<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
Maybe I read it wrong - but don't mix: a unit adjacent to a unit (auto ...

You mean - change it that you need to spot units in a hex where your LOS crosses the bocage in it? No, screws up nothing.

<t> Well I am not a developer, but: yes, it is like that.<br/>
However, feel free to play it with spotting. Maybe I will also try it one day.<br/>
<br/>
For the game mechanics itself, it is cohesive. The unit IS in open terrein. The same, when you trace LOS through 2 degrading hexes into an open ...

The FFE counter makes the difference.

<t> @Magua<br/>
As far as I understand it - all is correct what you say.<br/>
<br/>
@aknaton<br/>
Well, wont help you then, but I am working on something what should help a little. No really timeline for this project, though.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Anyways: <br/>
I was in my comment so ...

That is what the rules say [:)] => Yes!