Can't wait to see AWD: Deluxe and the other cool new stuff! Having trouble opening v 1.4 Posted to support.

<r> I'm currently using AWD V1.20 and I just downloaded V1.4 but the file will not open. I have Windows 8.1.<br/>
Any suggestions or help would be great, I'm not too embarrassed to admit there may be a simple solution to this, but I'm lost at the moment.<br/>
<br/>
This is where I DL'd the patch ...

update: just downloaded:
GG's World at World: A World Divided 1.040 Update
Posté: 9 MAR 2011.

FILE WILL NOT OPEN! I'M RUNNING WINDOWS 8.1, I'VE TRIED OPENING THE ZIP FILE WITH 9-ZIP AND WINDOWS EXPLORER AND IT FAILS....ANY HELP WOULD BE APPRECIATED!

<r> Howdy! Anybody Home?<br/>
<br/>
Here is a saga that may make you smile <E>:)</E> Haven't played since 2007 mwah, started as a Beta-Tester in summer 2006 because I liked the original GGWaW and noticed the call for volunteers for AWD on the forum; so I had the game from the very first version ...

Beautiful. Another masterwork from Lebatron.

<t> Darnit, I have to agree with WH basically because he's right about the forced historical path. It is clearly more "fun" to have them (technology breakthroughs) in the game, especially for the new or casual player but I'd actually prefer to see a lot more randomness via a really large range of ...

I got into WaW thanks to a retail sale at an AAFES........... : )
There must be a ton of guys on bases that would love to try AWD.......

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: MrQuiet<br/>
<br/>
What you guys are asking for is akin to saying naval units should be able to move through narrows without op-fire if they start there turn boardering the narrows (extreme example I know)<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Not so, the crossing of a ...

<t> It is a pity this was not thought out before. A combined fleet AA defense modifier seems like a great idea, it may even make BBs worthwhile apart from shore bombardment for a change. This does not cancel my agreement with the other proposed change regarding unique targeting for CAGs ...

<t> Some of the comments above seem to have been written without having read the arguments in this stream.<br/>
To reiterate:<br/>
CVs will remain first target choice for CAGs, weighted hugely in their favor.<br/>
<br/>
The essence of the rule change is this:<br/>
CAGs will choose unique ...

<t> I must admit that the case of China being unable to really do anything because of an ahistorical Japanese strategic air campaign is awkward. What is not awkward is that China pretty much did not do anything historically - certainly not in a conventional sense..........I'd sort of prefer to take ...

ORIGINAL: Lebatron

Scotland looks safe from Para's for now.

Have the rules changed about para range in this mod? I don't get it.

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>For more unpredictability, there could be a say, 1% chance any units travelling by transport, damaged rail, or amphibiously invading could be 'delayed' and stuck in place that turn. (Likewise there could be a 1% chance anything in the bottom left box of the Production Screen ...

Now, let's see what happens when I plug the video cable into the plasma big screen ...

Uh..............I totally want to see a pic of that
For real. Please.

Bloody awesome.......

<t> Not to beat a dead horse..............but...........<br/>
Is it just me or isn't it true that most enemy aircraft destroyed were destroyed by fighters both on the ground and in the air?<br/>
Shouldn't fighters be really good at attacking other aircraft on the ground.......you know, strafing ...

For what it's worth, Lebatron's got my support on all points. The "view combats only" in VCR mode change for FoW PBEMs seems particularly important. A player should not be able to see an opponent's moves in VCR mode that they are unable to figure out on their own turn.

<t> I was just posting my 2 cents on tac air as regards the CA bonus and had a thought..........<br/>
<br/>
Towards the end of WWII the fighter/bomber became the predominant air tool used to support the ground war, so why not increase the world standard on fighter land attack in order to make it ...

<t> Without addressing every point made above, I'd like to strongly support Art's argument about HB's above. They should not count toward obtaining CAM. If we take the Luftwaffe as the prime example of a "dive-bomber heavy" (i.e. an almost purely TACTICAL air force) air arm and see it's use in ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Lucky1<br/>
<br/>
Why aren't you in the tourney?<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I have a MAC and it doesn't support AWD : (<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: MrQuiet<br/>
<br/>
I'm not for sure but I dont think the projected odds calculator takes free ...