<t> Well, this is another game I won't be playing. Move every stack? Looking at just the Operation Typhoon screen shots, I won't live long enough to move all of the units. I wish I could play Grigsby games, but the micromanagement, particulalry for the entire Pacific or the Easten Front makes the ...

<t> I like the Limited Command Point Recovery. I just wish there was a way to undo a mistaken attachment without incurring the wrath of the rule. Occasionally I will make a mistaken attachment and immediately unattach, but the damage is done. It would be nice if you could unattach units that you ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: GShock<br/>
<br/>
The death or capture of a general should affect the PP loss imo. Still, captured generals should be considered dead <B><s>[b]</s>even when exchanged<e>[/b]</e></B>. That's what the release on parole means. Say one of those generals goes back ...

<t> I do not think it is correct to say exchanged prisoners did not resume fighting. If I recall correctly, exchanged prisoners were under no such prohibition, only paroled prisoners. For example, General Tilghman was captured at Fort Henry, later exchanged and fought (and died) at Champion's Hill ...

<t> I guess it is a sign of how good this game is that the most recent questions revolve around small matters. There do not appear to be any major game issues. Now, my nit. I like the way 1.03 has changed the opening of the game, particularly in Kentucky. Now, either side can respond to the other's ...

<t> This exact same thing happened to me. The Union staged a cavalry raid in Paducah in September 1861 and invaded the next turn. <br/>
<br/>
I have the save game files but when I tried to upload here, it said that it would not accept a .sav file. How do I transfer the files?<br/>
<br/>
I have e ...

<t> I thought leader specialization only mattered for CSC's. I am trying to use Pemberton as a Corps Commander. I have attached 6 infantry units and three artillery units to Pemberton. I also have attached 3 one star infantry generals and 3 artillery colonels to Pemberton, yet the interface still ...

<t> I have been watching this question, but I still do not think it has been answered.&nbsp; I understand that units get the benefit of their&nbsp;Corps commander&nbsp;and their CSC.&nbsp; I think the question is how does the game assign the individual units to the CSC's when they fight.&nbsp; For ...

<t> Joel: <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
Thanks for the quick response.&nbsp; Previously I think you said that specialty (infantry, cavalry, artillery, etc.) only counted for sub-commanders, that it had no effect if it was directly commanding the units.&nbsp; Is it the same for corps level command, that there ...

<t> When using sub-commanders, unless a corps commander's artillery rating is better than the artillery sub-commander's rating, is there any reason to attach artillery (with artillery sub-commanders) to a corps? When I create my armies, I usually only put infantry in the infantry corps and leave the ...

<t> This lack of commitment of the entire force drives me up the wall.&nbsp; I plan a great attack with overwhelming force, only to see my commander not commit half of it to the battle and lose.&nbsp; Then I remember Antietem, where a large part of the Union army sat around and did nothing, and I ...

<t> Why not simply prohibit overruns of neutral territory? Since there would be no overrun, there would be no strategic movemnet, no depot or fort building and no passing through "friendly" territory to reach that distant city region. The game already does this for naval invasions. It should not be ...

<t> Okay, now I'm confused. It's Summer 1863. Union forces with a depot are in Grenada, MS. Confederates are in Vicksburg and Jackson (Van Dorn with cavalry and intiative). I order my Jackson cavalry to raid Grenada. They refuse. I move them to Vicksburg and again ask them to raid Grenada. They ...

<t> I have to say that Victory's ACW represents to me the ultimate in board wargaming.&nbsp; In fact, I just recently took it and another ulitmate game, Victory's Panzer Commander (another Eric Lee Smith design), from my attic and am planning to play them.&nbsp; Back when ACW came out, we created ...

Don't forget Unentschieden. All while we were waiting for Stalingrad II that was never made. By the way, in 1958, was that Tactics II or just the original Tactics?

<t> I do not understand why there should be no garrison requirement. Admittedly, if the area has a higher attrition rate, it would probably have less indigenous people. However, if the invader wants the political points or to trace supply/command over it, there would have to be some exercise of ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Treefrog<br/>
<br/>
I'm not sure about the three being contiguous. <br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I took Doc's reference to adjacent to mean either adjacent to the Union or adjacent to the Confederacy, not adjacent to each other. I like that rule.<br ...

<t> There never seems to be enough artillery commanders, even after activating everyone available. In my games, there are always many more artillery units than artillery leaders. Should I leave my heavy artillery uncommanded on garrison duty in forts or should I use my precious artillery leaders to ...

<t> I am curious about this as well. I am usually scouring for good commanders to command my corps, resulting in my putting anyone available to command divisions. Do you create an uber corps if you put in division commanders all with an infantry rating of 3 or greater? Is it worth it since it will ...

<t> Yesterday I started playing Union v. AI at 4:00 p.m and did not stop until 1:30 a.m. It has been a long time since a game compelled me to play like that. And I only made it to May 1863. I still have several hours to go and cannot wait to get back to it (unfortunately real life will impinge on me ...