well damn didnt this thread get a little off topic i enjoyed reading it though

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Aurelian<br/>
<br/>
I think ole Al Syd is over rated. He managed to put enough troops into Fort Henry to make its surrender a major victory. And instead of acting as an army commander he acted like a regimental one and got himself killed.<br/>
<br/>
For ...

I agree the war was won in the west..

But Jackson had already proved himself as a independent commander maybe he could have gone west???

WHat do you think as i certainly think he is better than Bragg or johnston and ap hill

<t> I havent left a post here in awhile as last time i did it caused a bit conflict.<br/>
<br/>
Just wondering whether people are now happy with the realism of the game or they still groan about things are not how they are meant to be.<br/>
<br/>
If stonewall jackson had lived would it have ...

at what point did i say it was perfect no game out there is perfect someone is always not going to enjoy a certain aspect of the game

<t> geez good to see that this post stayed on track you lot should just agree to disagree and remember it is a game that is meant to be enjoyed and it is made to entertain to a broad market not to the 10 or 15 people who post on the forum kicking and screamin that it is not what they want and it ...

the compact history of the civi war is fairly detailed written by ernest dupuy

well it would have been reasonably closer to 90,000 as it would have included the richmond garrison troops in the shennodoah valley

yes sorry just the starting generals but i think the dates need to be reworked for some of the generals i just think that it is a bit out at the moment and it would have to be were they made there name as there rank is not always a way to judge them
&nbsp;

is there a way in the upcoming patch that the generals at the start of the game could be already assinged to the appropriate theatre

<t> i was not trying to be hostile but i dont think my post was selfish either as i think there are enough options in the game to give you just about any challenge you would like.<br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
as for not being accurate enough for some people what do they want do they just want the same economy ...

<t> do you still play the game? if you do it doesnt sound like you are enjoying it you want a harder challenge maybe you should try something else as just about every post i have seen of yours you are whinging about something that someone has said all i have done is voice an opinion and you didnt ...

but they are not being put in the same situation as you suggest and i will say that i love the game the way it is i dont see the need to change it as you can set your own challenge of what you want to happen
&nbsp;
was just trying to make a point

but there is nothing asying you have to give them the t34s either if the resources are there or not there is now one to say you have to use them

<t> you can make a game of it as the south but are people doing that if they want a historical game then these things happened not missing the point at all i realise why the south has some advantages but so does the north if they are used to proper affect you cannot win the game in the first turn it ...

<t> so you want a historical test?<br/>
do you have joe johnston in charge of the east? do you have 20000 men being captured in fort donelson in the west? do you have mclellan vaccilating at every chance he gets? <br/>
<br/>
how many of you people promote lee at the start of the game when if you ...

will it be released in stores in australia

wil it be released into store in australia as i have a few mates that want it but dont buy anything of the net

can you show me a picture if you can please
&nbsp;

i will put my hand up if needed i can give it a try atleast never done anything like it before though