<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work<br/>
You can't deploy troops you don't have!!<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
They <I><s>[i]</s>did<e>[/i]</e></I> have them, on July 31. If Britian hadn't entered the war, the French wouldn't have just left a gap in the line. Given the scale of ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work<br/>
<br/>
Yes but if the British had not ben there he would not have had to panic - the German line would have outflanked the French and rolled them up.<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Maybe, maybe not- the French would have presumably deployed ...

Thanks!

Sorry for the dumb question, but do I get a printed manual for my extra $10, or just a CD and box?

ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk

The Germans had a hard enough time supplying Kluck and von Bulow as is.

I think this gets at the real reason for the German failure in 1914.

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Berkut<br/>
I don't think Britain would have sat on the sidelines for too long absent the invasion of Belgium, they would have still entered the war, and probably sooner rather than later - they had made some promises to France after all. But I think that ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: marklv<br/>
Although the British forces would grow to a very substantial size over the course of the war, the British presence in 1914 was strategically insignificant. The Germans are stopped by their own indecision on the Marne when up against stiff resistance ...