<t> Some questions, <br/>
<br/>
The game is about the approach to the city and the battle in the city ? Is operation uranus also included ? <br/>
The game looks a lot like the 30 years ago released game " 4v4 world at war stalingrad" wich was also a wego game, does it compare and what are the ...

<t> To bad that this kind of games are highly unrealistic, no way germany could have fielded 3 times more panzers then in reality. <br/>
These kind of games do a poor job as a historical simulation, not that they are not fun to play.<br/>
Knowing what the historical situation was , it is ...

Any plans bringing this out on steam ? Here on matrix the digital download has a shelf time.

<t> It seems that often people try to correct mistakes they make with a house rule. There is always a trade off between a tactic you choose and the results you get.<br/>
One should ask himself what the reason is why they find themselves in this situation . <br/>
In my opinion, to many games have ...

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=60a_1386427683

Already found, can be closed

000

Indeed, starting a hame with no rules and then find out that you have some problems with the game is not a good way to start a game.

Opponent found Thx for the replies.

The Japanese player gave up because the allies bombed his ships at anchor in ports with wich he could not live.
His choice, I think it would be wiser not to anchor in range of allied bombers .

I am lookin for a allied or Japanese player. Prefer scen 1, no house rules or a minimum. Can return 2 - 3 turnes a week. Have played 1 game so far ( wich ended after 1 month because opponent threw in the towel )

We are using two rules that favor the allies - No 4E naval attacks below 10k and a rule that limits night bombing. Other than that, the rules are either neutral or favor the allies.

And how do these rules favour the allies ?

1 Russia is not communist
2 North korea anc china fought the Us , the most powerfull nation during the korean war to a standstill.
3 you do not need a missile to get a nuke to the US

<t> It seems that some players are bullied around by their wife/partner/gaylord, maybey they lack arguments to convince them that wargaming is not such a bad deal. <br/>
To help them out i suggest to come up with some arguments that can be used to convince them.<br/>
Some ideas :<br/>
<br/>
1 ...

Yes I did, was a decent game, the first two being my favorite. It did have multiplayer for battles, the campaign was another story.

I loved SFB, to bad it has no decent online multiplayer platform.

Yes to all questions, how do i upload images ?

I have 2 ships wich refuse to lay mines, the TF was created at the base where they should lay mines, destination and home port are the same, they start at their destination but no mines are deployed. Any ideas ? I have lay mines switched on .

Greetings

David

That point (concentration in one hex ) goes for other bases also, unless the production is concentrated at one point ( mines for resources ) one could argue a case for spreading al resources and oil on the map.

<t> The units are air units, the game is currently 15 jan 42, i have to withdraw some bomber units bolo's in this case, they are stationed at SF and the withdraw button is greyed out. Disbanding LCU's at SF seems to work for certain units, not all. Is just disbanding the air units counted as ...