Looks like the beta of 1276.1 (the current Steam beta) the altitude/depth control for wire-guided torpedoes is missing (see screenshot where the option is blank).

I took a fresh computer and loaded a fresh CMO with the official release (presumably v1.04.114749 though I didn't record this data) and ...

Absolutely stellar work, thank you!

Is this fix:
* FIXED: [B1268.1] Altitude setting not reflected on the sidebar

at all related to the missing altitude control for wire-guided torpedoes (e.g. Mk48 Mod7 ADCAP CBASS, ID1712 in DB495)? It used to be we could control the depth of torpedoes when under ...

<t> A further point on the scoring is that the 100 point deduction to Coalition Forces occurs even after China fires first and Coalition is simply defending itself. That is, each Luda fires as soon as they ID the Coalition ships, but self-defense/retaliation results in the 100 point strike. It ...

<r> Hi, All-<br/>
While a minority of airframes, some of the KC-10As have wing pods:<br/>
<br/>
"Twenty KC-10s [which is 33% given 60 aircraft were made] were modified to add wing-mounted pods further enhancing their aerial refueling capabilities."<br/>
<URL url="http://www.af.mil/AboutUs ...

<r> Hi, All-<br/>
Britain's Sentry AEW.1 [E-3D] (units #97 and #587 in DB444) are missing the second form of refueling hookup (probe refueling) they are capable of:<br/>
<br/>
"The E-3D is the only aircraft in the RAF’s inventory capable of air-to-air refueling by both the American ‘flying-boom ...

<t> Hi, All-<br/>
I believe I found an issue with this scenario, but please let me know if it's just me.<br/>
<br/>
In this scenario, the two Freedom-class LCSs (2008 entry) seem unable to fire their RGM-176B Griffin IIB missiles no matter what I do--they complain of "No weapons director ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: emsoy<br/>
<br/>
Have you replaced the scenario files? We fixed some errors and the scen files should be included in the v1.11 package [8D]
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Indeed, I overwrote all resident files from the 1.11RC1 zip file; and the NI scenario ...

<r> SUPER excited about 1.11 additions & improvements; many thanks, Devs, for this massive update and continued support over the years!<br/>
<br/>
I had no trouble updating Command to 1.11 RC1 via the zip file. DB is 442 (latest).<br/>
<br/>
I'm still working on NI, however, and when I load ...

<t> Hi, Devs-<br/>
I am by no means an expert with the scoring mechanisms in CMANO, but in this mission it appears as though 100 points is only awarded if the USS Guadalcanal is sunk and not if it enters the Safe Haven area as intended. I believe the error is a simple mistake of the event trigger ...

<t> Using RC9 (I skipped RC10 given emsoy's message), it appears the "Use Refuel/UNREP" of a tanker (e.g. KA-3B) affects whether airborne refueling works when the determinant should be just the receiving aircraft's doctrine (or at least used to be).<br/>
<br/>
I often set the global/general ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Primarchx<br/>
<br/>
Just putting in another plug for a doctrine to disable RTB Bingo at the side/group/unit level.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Enthusiastic +1 (sorry for the thread jacking). With aerial refueling resolved as it has been the need for a ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: strykerpsg<br/>
<br/>
I didn't find the XL in the database. I ensured to pull down real and hypothetical US aircraft with the latest DB build as of the last RC release. Was it introduced with this latest RC4?<br/>
<br/>
Thanks for otherwise outstanding work ...

<r> <B><s>[b]</s>[ALREADY THERE, RENAMED DB v439]<e>[/b]</e></B><br/>
<br/>
Though very small in number, it might be nice to have the largest aerial tanker ever proposed and built (and perhaps even still in use with Iran) added to the database--the KC-25, KC-747 or KC-33A:<br/>
<br/>
KC-25 ...

<t> Hi, Guys-<br/>
Looks like the KA-3B Navy version cannot act as a tanker like the KA-3B MC version (the Navy seems to be missing the "Wing Drogue" property entry).<br/>
<br/>
Also, my reading of the EKA-3B is that it can do both offensive ECM as well as act as a tanker, but the database ...

<r> <B><s>[b]</s>[FIXED DB v435] <e>[/b]</e></B> <br/>
<br/>
Thank you for adding the KA-3B in the latest database, team (reported here: <URL url="http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3436846"><LINK_TEXT text="fb.asp?m=3436846">http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3436846</LINK_TEXT ...

A sound analysis and a million miles, indeed, Mike.

That helps a ton; thank you for the thorough explanation! Duelist is now next on my list.

<t> Playing around some more I see I can get the Slava to engage the TALDs via the methods you suggest, Mike, but both require that I edit a scenario if the author hasn't setup this exclusion zone around the ship or has the AI set to engage unidentified targets (the latter being somewhat ...

Thanks for the explanation, Mike! I'm very glad it's me and not the game. I'll work on getting it right and see if Baloogan has a tutorial on using the decoys. If anyone has anything else to help guide me with decoy use, I'd be most appreciative. Thanks, all!

<t> In v1.06 (Build 624) I can't seem to get the AI to engage my TALDs. Creating a blank scenario, the AI classifies them as Bogies, indeed, but they're deemed of an unknown class and unknown side and presumably aren't engaged for this reason (same result as in the scenario I was playing when I ...

Thanks, guys, for the testing and info! It's much appreciated.