Many thanks! I thought in Toaw IV, terrain only affects the RFC indirectly through AT-AP bonuses.

So now is the effect of terrain double counted?

For example, first the terrain will increase the defender's AP, improving the strength ration.

Next, the "ratio will be further modified by terrain ...

In TOAW III 3.4 the manual explicitly says that the RFC probability will be directly reduced by 83% if the unit is in a fortification line.

However, I find no information about terrain RFC effects in the TOAW IV manual. I wonder if this mechanics still exist.

In TOAW IV does the terrain only ...

Curtis Lemay wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 3:00 am Be sure you're running the latest version.

Well still, in T3 you could plan attack on an empty land to check the air-cooperation and the cooperation from different tiles.

In T4, you cannot check the cooperation between air and land units unless there is an enemy unit nearby.

In TOAW III 3.4 the manual explicitly says that the RFC probability will be reduced by 83% if the unit is in a fortification line.

However, I find no information in the TOAW IV manual. I wonder if this mechanics still exist.

Dear Great Author of TGW, I wonder if there exists a detailed scenario description txt or scenario design txt that explains the mechanics in detail.

Any designer's note will be very helpful!

If you use "planning a battle" to check cooperation you have no idea if a non-movable or a re-organizing unit is cooperative or not.

In T3 you could once easily check cooperation by "show group composition".

Cooperation status is very important because non-cooperative units suffer 60% of penalty ...

The plan attack window will work only if there is an enemy nearby. If no enemy is adjacent to your units in question, you cannot plan an attack in TOAW IV. But in TOAW III you can always plan attack even if your target in an empty land.

Is this true?

<r> In Toaw3 there are three easy ways to show cooperation. First you could show the nine units in a single cell, and that interface will have golden or silver flags that tell you cooperation status of <B><s>[b]</s>each <e>[/b]</e></B>unit.<br/>
<br/>
Or, you could plan an attack on an empty land ...

Free-support and formation support units are very valuable as they cooperate with many units. How do we know which unit is a free-suppot?

Well done!!!!

<Post deleted and moved the the main forum>

no replies?

<t> Thanks. This is a very interesting design. When Axis is advancing, more and more soviet reserves are going to be released. Basically when axis is near Kharkov, one Soviet corp is triggered to be unfroze. <br/>
<br/>
May I also ask if you made this "trigger" based on historical facts or general ...

Hi, I noticed that the soviet 64 rifle corp (at north Georgia) was set to be activated on turn 500. However, when I am playing this scenario, they are activated on T8. Is this set on purpose? Is this set through scenario events? Are there a list of events for TGW? Thanks again.

<t> Thanks again! I am simulating on 1.11 version with my friend right now. <br/>
<br/>
Yes, all the mech corps have BT-7. However all the junk corps had the "replacement priority" set to "None", which means that they are not going to absorb any BT-7 (as well as any other equips) from the ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653<br/>
<br/>
One [1]. As in 'adjacent', or 'next to'.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Thanks again for your kindness. I have two more questions if you dont mind.<br/>
<br/>
1. I am having trouble searching for the TGW v1.8. The one officially included ...

next to

Thanks! This is really helpful.

May I also ask how many hexes in distance could be considered as "next to" ?

Hi, could any please let me know the mobilization conditions of Soviet "reorganizing" reserves? e.g. those in Georgia.

I also wonder if there is a development thread for TGW scenario, or a TGW hand-book/house rules.

Much appreciated!