I'm looking for players interested in PBEM play-testing a new scenario prior to its release here. A hypothetical, the scenario covers the Western Front, mid-July 1944, to end-March 1945. Game scale is 5km per hex, and 75 half-week turns, with predominantly regiment-level maneuver units. Those ...

I've been trying to send private messages, but they all get stuck in my Outbox - thus remain unsent.
What the hey am I doing wrong??

Hi Cpl GAC,
These are formation limit units that were included (laboriously) in the majority of Soviet formations to prevent the Soviet player breaking units. They make for better PBEM balance, but have no impact on the scenario.
We elected to include them because of the rather serious 'ant-unit ...

AAR – JanRoss Playtest 2

Introduction
The following AAR will take the form of a series detailing fortnightly (4-turns bi-weekly) outcomes of a PBEM of RGW 41-43 between myself (Monash), and my friend, the very talented Jan Ekelin. This is an authorised variant of Steve Sill’s Russo-German War ...

Hi GD,
I received your reply (into my Monash e-mail), and fully understand the timezone is an issue.
Would you be available say, Sunday morning UK for a Zoom??
If yes I will tee up all arrangements, and have a simple summary of what we are hoping to achieve.
KInd regards
Ross

<t> I am hoping someone in the TOAW may be help with a victory calibration problem a small group of us are having with a modification to an existing scenario? <br/>
<br/>
Specifically: we are wanting scenario victory to be determined by two things, <br/>
<br/>
1. Geographic dimension (VP hexes ...

An opponent has been forthcoming....

Thanks to those who considered it!

<t> It’s been quite a while. Anyone interested in playing Patton 09/44...?? Any side is fine. <br/>
<br/>
If yes, just yell here ASAP!<br/>
<br/>
Full disclosure - I tried to have a go versus the PO as the Yanks and the Chermans smashed anything that was not well dug in and masked with heavies ...