Thx a lot!

F-35 OECM Jammer working on I/J bands is able to suppress multiple (AFAIR 17) radars spanning multiple technology levels and A/B/C/D/E/F/G/H bands.

Scenario attached with most common radars found in Russian EW sites + S-400a & b.

F-35 is not detected at all and basically flies over the radar site ...

I submitted that DB request.

Practical in-game side effect of not having this implemented is that for example all exoatmospheric missiles attempt to intercept Iskanders when they are not launched at their maximum range (in reality they fly the flattened curve).

Happens all the time for me with ...

It did improve, thanks.

Thank you.

Attached another save.

My main problem with original scenario with just Aegis Ashore in Poland was that it stated purpose is to intercept ballistic missiles from Iran targeting mainland US. The radar was not detecting them.It's stated range is 175nm against targets with large RCS which well does ...

I understand that, however during the engagement/ when FC radar is used they could be split and shown separately (2 at the same time).

As it was the case in one of the betas when this feature was introduced. And that worked better IMHO.

After the engagement it can go back to the current behavior ...

Thanks.

Still happens in 1328.8.

Still happens in 1328.8.

Happens in 1328.8.

Confirming the issue, in my case blurriness or edges are visible when map renders (depending on zoom level), though it renders quicker than in previous prod version.

Confirming the issue, facilities move when the map is moved.

scr_shoot_map.jpg This happens regardless of location. I moved to previously non visited location and this is what I got.

with 1328.8 it looks like more tiles load and they load quicker, but still at some point the loading stalls. Sometimes I get only one tile loaded and it is very blurry. At the ...

Yes it is.

It actually works pretty well in a non-beta version.

In 1328.7 it does not work. Sometimes I can see a few blurred tiles with it (unsure if this is due to them being loaded from cache).

Hi Guys,

Seems FOV works well now. However, when a unit has an acquisition radar and FCR radar, FCR engagement arc is not visible. Switching off non-FCR radar shows the correct arc.

FCR+Acquisition on:
fov 1 - FCR + Acquisition.png

FCR on Acquisition off:
fov 1 - FCR radar.png

Is it working ...

Hi Guys,

Just tested a ballistic missile trajectory of a possible early ICBM from Iran. I tried SS-9 (5500 nm range) and launched it at maximum distance to make the trajectory as flat as possible.

It should be within detection capabilities of Aegis Ashore Radar in Redzikowo, Poland.

Trajectory ...

Hard to say. With B1285.1 and DB480 SM-3s get almost 100% success rate (weird by itself). So I can't really generate 'lots of missiles petered out' case because of such high efficiency. Also if the target is destroyed missiles in flight get re-targeted, so it is even harder to generate the test case ...

Yes it was (in B1283.1 already).

Thanks for solving this and sorry for the late reply.

I was doing exactly what you described except removing the vehicle I think. I just removed 2 secondary radars.

The reason they were removed is described here:
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10230&t=388425&p=5035542#p5035542 ...