Only in VID's model images

Whoops, someone's actually playing the Oceania enabled game.
Rather than forming an alliance, I feel more like I've become MTH's puppet. LMAO

Out of interest, Why do you despise this? if you have individuals with certain tendencies, it would make sense that they would either agree or disagree with the direction of the nation and act accordingly. it can be annoying to have rebellions and things when people aren't happy But I'd be ...

What I mean is that this is a 4X game, and external expansion is more essential. The fact that regime profiles can significantly impact available resources (BP or even IC) is already highly gamified. This DLC seems to just add more regime profiles and a series of event chains. However, according to ...

This feature already exists in the game. There are also random events where factions attack each other. Overall, it's a system I absolutely despise.

Raising the requirements for nuclear weapons is a good thing, but I don't think we've ever asked for that—what people have always wanted is to remove nukes altogether. Why not offer a se1 without nuclear weapons as an alternative game start when creating the game?

I feel like the new DLC is like Oceania without a navy — it just adds a few regime profiles.

After trying some data editing, I realized that the game design makes it impossible to maintain regime profiles above 90. When some profiles are above 90, the corresponding options add very little to the 'wanted' profile, while choosing other options greatly increases the 'I don't want' profiles ...

When I link both ends of the path directly, I can see that it is more efficient in terms of IP and metal usage. The auto planned path not only consumes more IP, but also twice as much metal.

While those councils have discovered most of the tier 6 tech, I've noticed that housing in tier 5 has been missing. This seems to happen in my multiple games.

Luckily they should not occur that often

Is this true? Why are there tons of these dangerous events happening every turn?

Vic wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:14 pm Found the issue and will be fixed in next version of this patch! big thanks.

Great. So when I load this save after the next patch, will this problem be fixed automatically?

No decision events requiring an appointment arose after I created the Air Force Research Council and established an infantry brigade.

+1.
They works like a minor without diplomacy

I have now created a new VTOL transport model, but the makeshift zone created after airborne doesn't allow me to colonize it, even if I have enough logistic points, or even to send replacements, why?

SE's implementation of the airborne aspect is extremely unrealistic. I can't think of any reason to ...

Theoretically it is possible to build expeditionary airfields after only airdropping some personnel and equipment.
Expeditionary Airfields - https://www.navair.navy.mil/product/expeditionary-airfields-0
I don't know why SE even needs to do airport class restrictions on these large planes. It makes ...

I designed and built a bunch of large transports and plan to take over unoccupied peninsulas that are about 20 hexs away. Because in my imagination I can airdrop troops and supplies for combat, just like MTH.
But sadly after checking the manual I realized that SE requires an airfield for these ...

Their capital has been captured by me and the country is on the verge of destruction, but they are still trying to blackmail me for money or PP.
I didn't want to use the console, but Vic, why is denying his peace request in this situation negatively affecting my profile? I didn't want to use the ...

Within 10 turns of the start of the game, while the players were still worrying about generating enough Minor cards, AI Major was actually able to annex several non-farmer Minors in a row; how was the AI able to annex subcultures such as Guardians and Confeds so quickly through peaceful means when ...