Cavalry Corp wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 10:39 am patch should be in a few days...

Cavalry Corp, how's the progress going on the patch? Once again, thanks for all your work

RangerJoe wrote: Mon Aug 25, 2025 6:58 pm 28 is in Matrix hands doing the final testing from what I was told.

10-4. I’ve been working on my own personal mod with the Ironman AI scripts in 1128 for about six months now, and I was just hoping I wouldn’t have to scrap the whole thing.

zebrazwo wrote: Mon Aug 25, 2025 5:29 pm

GivingUpTheGhost wrote: Mon Aug 25, 2025 5:22 pm If I’m understanding the responses correctly, does this mean that work has stopped on 1128?
If so, do you guys recommend the .exe for 26 or "27" going forward?

btw work hasn't stopped on 28, 28 is in the process of being "debugged".

Thanks!

If I’m understanding the responses correctly, does this mean that work has stopped on 1128?
If so, do you guys recommend the .exe for 26 or "27" going forward?

Cavalry Corp, love this mod! Thank you for all the effort in making it. With that said, on this latest update, it looks like scen 42 is missing. Once again, thanks for all the hard work.

btd64 wrote: Sun May 25, 2025 3:48 pm

GivingUpTheGhost wrote: Sun May 25, 2025 3:43 pm General, are you referring to device 254 (aviation support) or air capacity?

Air capacity. Aviation support is a ground unit thing....GP

thanks

General, are you referring to device 254 (aviation support) or air capacity?

I'm working on a personal mod and just wondering if anyone has ever added aviation support to the Unicorn class to replicate it being a repair/auxiliary carrier? Is this a little too ambitious for the game engine?

Does the AI repair, upgrade, and/or convert any of the ships on their side?

That should need a different font . . .


I just added my usual switches and things work fine....but the old-style map is...fugly... 8-)


Yeah I used to love the Kamikaze Bellum Pacifica map but it is now outdated. It has take some getting used to returning to the old map style but it is ...

First, thank you to everyone who made this happen.

not really a big deal, but just a few database issues I noticed
the following ship entries should have their ship classes listed as 202 - River British
19071
19072
19075
19076
19081

Not quite right Bella - removing the Carrier's air group can be a very good move. If you look at the aircraft fatigue/damage rate on the ship and how fast it repairs if the aircraft are on the ship in port, it is very slow. But if you transfer the aircraft to a land airfield with good Air Support ...

In response to:
"-s designation identifies bases that the air unit can transfer by ship. Anyone seen this??"

-s designation is for off-map movement. For example, Eastern US to Cape Town


No wonder I can't find an example all my checking was done as Japan and I probably wouldn't of thought of ...

In response to:
"-s designation identifies bases that the air unit can transfer by ship. Anyone seen this??"

-s designation is for off-map movement. For example, Eastern US to Cape Town


I think the general idea behind that -s designation is that the air unit is being abstractly "shipped" to ...

In response to:
"-s designation identifies bases that the air unit can transfer by ship. Anyone seen this??"

-s designation is for off-map movement. For example, Eastern US to Cape Town

Good morning!

To add (and to pad my post count on out way to 1 million posts on forum), I always try to change sub skippers yo best available.

- best naval skill with one caveat

- don't put high aggression skippers into low experience subs (I think in my current game O'Kane (aggr. 90) has lost at least ...

Yaab wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:03 pm For air group leaders, it denotes a flying leader. Such leaders will physically fly air mission, and can become KIA, WIA, or MIA.

Thanks

What does the * symbol next to leaders mean? If nothing else, where is the info located in the manual

btd64 wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 6:06 pm

GivingUpTheGhost wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:10 pm Are we still looking at a few more weeks? Thanks in advance

Yes....GP

Thank you, GP. Greatly appreciated