<t>I agree that for a good game cost isn't really an issue. However, why not keep the initial cost about where it is now, but provide upgrades/bug fixes based upon info received from those of us that play the game for a minor fee...say $5 - 10 per upgrade. Then we can see the value for our dollars ...

<r><QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by Lokioftheaesir:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s>High Command looks nice but the AI is crap. I've played the Axis twice and have always ended up invading and crushing England(end of game)by late '41 and then it's all over. this is besides taking All of N/Africa and even ...

<t>I like High Command...in fact I'm still playing a couple of email games..Ones been going one for almost 2 years. The game definitely has some flaws, but if you're looking for a grand strategic game of Europe 1939 -1945 I think this is it. Its nice to control everything, political, production and ...

<t>I've always played as the Axis and massed my air units in the HQ's with the highest leader rating. Thus I've got about 6 or 7 HQ's that I use, the rest just sit back unused well behind the lines. I also mass the ground units this way. I figure let me take advantage of the stong leaders. I keep ...

<t>I would have NO problem paying for a "fixed" or even a redone High Command. I have never understood why games are not periodicly updated/upgraded like other commercial software. Why do another grand strategy game, deal with all the bugs, playablility problems, etc. if there is already a good ...

I agree, High Command would greatly benefit from some bug fixes and the addition of PBEM. No other game that I have played gives you the feel of the overall strategy of the war. Production, R&D, intelliegence, diplomacy... the game offers it all. it just needs some fixes and updates.