<t>NEON - an empty Italian front will have an event, unless one already occured in the very recent past.<br/>
<br/>
Sorry, I am clueless in Colorado.<br/>
<br/>
---------------------------------------------<br/>
<br/>
The reason I asked Rick was I put 2000+ aircraft in the Italian front by ...

<t>I forgot.<br/>
<br/>
If you transfer all air units out the strength looks the same. but, if you transfer a ground unit in then back out it <br/>
still goes lower without having to save and reenter. <br/>
<br/>
Is there a strength number in 41 that would make the italian front bust everytime ...

<t>I COULD BE ALL WET BUT I BELIEVE AIRPOWER DOES COUNT.<br/>
<br/>
41 scenario starts with 1797 strength as is.<br/>
<br/>
I boosted that strenght to 2028 by adding<br/>
ss police division, two italian divisions from the italian 8th army and a hungarian light infintry divsion from hungarian hq.<br ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by Frank:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s>Hey boys, be nice guys! You can have different opinions but do you really have to be this aggressive?<br/>
<br/>
<e>[/b]</e></B><e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>

No Frank we dont <IMG src="http://www.matrixgames.com/ubb/smile.gif"><s>[img ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by Ed Cogburn:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s> <br/>
Smart move, Mist. <IMG src="http://www.matrixgames.com/ubb/biggrin.gif"><s>[img]</s><URL url="http://www.matrixgames.com/ubb/biggrin.gif">http://www.matrixgames.com/ubb/biggrin.gif</URL><e>[/img]</e></IMG><e>[/b]</e ...

Now how did you ever arrive at that conclusion? Was it something I posted? No! This is just another trip to NEON DEON FANTASY LAND.


Oh so the US had superior mobility?

Or, they didnt?

OOPS.

The US had 140 million in 45.

It is to find US stats for 1945.
Russian stats arent so easy.

Russia only had a 180 million people?

I thought the US had 180 million in 45.

<t>That does not mean that air superiority is a fact. All it means is that it might help win the battle. Nothing more, nothing less. Without further evidence you cannot claim that air superiority is a fact. So if you can produce that evidence THEN you would be right. But not until then.<br/>
<br ...

<r>QUOTE:<br/>
and the yankees plan to do it with an elite raccoon rapid reaction force (art of wargaming board joke) and it's no by cell phone its by handie (translation of the Finnish slang word for handphone)<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
-----------------------------------<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
REPLY:<br/>
LOL ...

I think the Finns plan on taking over the world by cell phone

<r><br/>
The Russian Air Force cannot afford to concentrate on one spot.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Virtually all of the Russians oil resources are in one area and Well within striking distance of British Airbases In Iraq. RAF bomber command alone could take out the caucasses. In fact, Churchill Came close to ...

<t>QUOTE FROM MONI KERR:<br/>
You take a statement that is hypothetical and without any evidence turn it into a statement of fact. That requires a complete suspension of all the rules of logic and reasoning, so of course I can't understand it. Now if you could present a reasoned and logical argument ...

If you use dos version, and boot disk from old game will that work? because I have old
boot disk for microprose Task force 1942. It
configs the system to run only the mouse and
shuts out everything else. This is also how
I use second front which I got back in 1989.

<t><br/>
<br/>
QUOTES by MIST:<br/>
Why wouldn't you talk about Axis allied with USSR and declared war to US? I bet US would be beaten everywhere!<br/>
<br/>
-----------------------------------------<br/>
REPLY:<br/>
Ok ill bite. Mist, before I assume anything I have to ask you. Do you mean the ...

Oh no this thread is starting to polarize just like the last one!!!

<r><br/>
Zaggys,<br/>
<br/>
Neon Deon: "Lost less than 2% of her population"<br/>
You mean less than 0.2% of course. <br/>
<br/>
-----------------------------------------<br/>
<br/>
oops <IMG src="http://www.matrixgames.com/ubb/wink.gif"><s>[img]</s><URL url="http://www.matrixgames.com/ubb/wink.gif ...

<t><br/>
<br/>
OPTHA<br/>
QUOTE:<br/>
Its boring to discuss about a air superioty in one week, while the allies need over a year to crush the Luftwaffe. On the other side, US lost about 250.000 Soldiers in WWII. How much would die in a WWIII starting in 45?<br/>
The overall US-tactic depend on "Let ...

<t>Actually it's a simple read. Comprehension is obviously not one of your stronger traits. <br/>
And I'm still waiting for you to point out all the contradictions you claim are in there.<br/>
<br/>
-------------------------------------------<br/>
<br/>
``Superior handling and air superiority might ...

<r>Yes TS it is not an easy read at all. <br/>
<br/>
Moni, <br/>
<br/>
You still dont get it. The operation called for a limited war. NOT TOTAL WAR. <br/>
<br/>
and, it says air superiority and superior mobility. I still dont see what is so hard to interpret from that part, unless of course english ...