<t>I don't think I have run into a Avalon Hill computer game yet that didn't deserve the death penalty for the programmer!!! They have produced some seriously bad computer games...the last one was Squad Leader...which had nothing in common with its board game brethern!!!<br/>
<br/>
I am glad that AH ...

<r>I totally agree with you Jsherfy! Battles of Napoleon is a great game and is the best tactical Napoleonic game to date...if you can get past the dated graphics! I have always dreamed of someone bringing this game back with some updated graphics and tying it in with a strategic level game.<br ...

<t>I liked War and Peace too, for the most part. I think the combat chit choices were...hmm...weaker than what EIA has/had to offer. War and Peace I think offered more operational manuvuer decisions than EIA. In EIA its basically build up a big stack of troops and jump the other guy's big stack. Of ...

<t>If this game is to based off of the EIA system I think it should be easy. The attacker(phasing player) and defender(non-phasing) should be pre-determined. After that, each player's forces should be displayed in corps format and strength points totaled at the bottom. Leader's tactical die roll ...

<t>Hello all,<br/>
<br/>
From what I have read this game will be based off of Empires in Arms (EIA).<br/>
I would like to submit this for consideration and debate on how to handle leader tactical ratings for the resolution land combat. Leaders have a tactical rating between 1 (lowest) and 5 (highest ...