<r> I just did a Google search to try and find a discussion of this and didn't find anything, I've always been bothered by the way MANPADS are modeled with SAM sites, it doesn't seem very realistic from the perspective that you'll launch an attack against these units with various weapons, in ...

ORIGINAL: Eggstor

Do a deep rebuild of the scenario, making sure the "apply ini file" box is checked and, when prompted, find the Korean Missile Crisis ini file. Also, make sure you save after rebuilding.

Thanks, that fixed it!

I haven't seen this mentioned, in my version of this scenario the two US DDG's start with only 13,198 fuel units, which doesn't last long, and I must confess I'm not an expert with the Scenario Editor and can not figure out how to fix this myself.

<r> Here's an article about these refits:<br/>
<br/>
<URL url="http://sputniknews.com/military/20110921/167012600.html">http://sputniknews.com/military/20110921/167012600.html</URL><br/>
<br/>
This article is from 2011 and the expected completion date for the Nakhimov at the time was 2015. I ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: neno<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
If you don't mind, I'd like to suggest to leave the current detection system for warships only, but make non-visual detection unable to identify the side for civilian ships. The reasoning behind this is that the subs have warships ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: cns180784<br/>
<br/>
Yep its fantastic, and when the advanced strike planner arrives i think we'll all have died and gone to heaven lol.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>That would really warrant a version 2.0 ... I like to save money as much as the next person, I ...

<t> I'm not quite as in touch with the US shipbuilding industry as I once was, it seems like the obvious solution to squeezing some efficiencies out in the long-term would be to build the next SSBN only at EB and let NNS build the Virginia Class only once construction on that project starts ...

<r> I'm setting up a new computer right now, the version of CMANO I received was 1.05 and I get the same error mentioned by jam if I try to run the 1.10 update installer. Fortunately I think I saved the old updates ... we'll see, but in summary I agree with jam that the necessary information and ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Nightwatch<br/>
<br/>
There will be Performance improvements with patch 1.11.<br/>
Nothing spectacular is happening on the hardware front. <br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>Well, my previous computer is six years old, and was modern but not state of the art when I ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: FlyingBear<br/>
<br/>
The reference I mention above (published in 2004) states as the reason for the titanium hull (page 141):<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Compared to steel, titanium provided a number of advantages in Project 705:<br/>
- 30 percent lower mass ...

ORIGINAL: Sunburn

If you are planning on getting a new PC specifically for Command I'd suggest holding off a bit.

Why, is Command going away? [:D]

<t> Command runs too darn slow on my older computer and I'm going to go ahead and build a new one, is Command very video intensive, would using the built-in Intel 530 graphics be much of a bottleneck for running Command? I really don't play anything else on my computer, it's mostly for Email ...

<r> <IMG src="http://home.sprintmail.com/~beckley/RTB.JPG"><s>[img]</s><URL url="http://home.sprintmail.com/~beckley/RTB.JPG">http://home.sprintmail.com/~beckley/RTB.JPG</URL><e>[/img]</e></IMG><br/>
<br/>
This illustrates the behavior for example ...<br/>
<br/>
My uneducated guess was because ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mikmyk<br/>
<br/>
Can you confirm that you adjusted the Winchester ROE.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>Sorry for my delay in responding, work has been interfering with my ability to focus on Command. ;o)<br/>
<br/>
I did confirm I changed the settings and it helps ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mikmyk<br/>
<br/>
Yeah there is no chaining separate missions but you can add the secondary targets to your initial strike list. If its in the same region than it will likely work fine. Obviously look at Winchester and weapons control settings to make sure you ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: DESRON420<br/>
<br/>
<URL url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb#Interceptors"><LINK_TEXT text="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flyin ... terceptors">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb#Interceptors</LINK_TEXT></URL><br/>
<br/>
The ...

<r> Thanks for the responses, I appreciate it!<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Skjold<br/>
<br/>
Regarding the Winchester problem, change their side doctrine to RTB if Winchester > No.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>Just tried this, btw, I meant to post originally I tested this all again this ...

<t> I'm new to Command, been playing a couple weeks now and it is fantastic. However, I do have some annoyances with it, but maybe I'm missing something. The big one is I can't seem to re-assign multi-role aircraft to new missions once they finish their first. For example, I launch an EA-18 with ...

They behave more like cruisers and destroyers and such, but you basically have to keep them in a base hex except for short trips from base and back because they have a very short range. They can be grouped in TF's, and really they have to be in order to be at all effective.

<t> Note that you need to have at least that number of supplies at a base to keep all the units supplied adequately, so even though you wouldn't burn through them all in one day you need to keep that number there for the units to operate at proper efficiency. Level bombers require twice the number ...