<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Veers<br/>
<br/>
Well, you may just not be noticing the difference, try a modern scenario and you will see your tanks slaughtered by infantry AT weapons.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I am aware of the difference, thats why I excluded 43 and 44 with ...

<r> I have played quite a few WII scenarios now, and each time I get a strange feeling that something feels completely wrong about combat results in TOAW, especially when attacking with armour against infantry.<br/>
<br/>
It feels that the attack and defence <B><s>[b]</s>numbers<e>[/b]</e></B> are ...

<r> Colin, thank you for the correction about the Forward Luftwaffe bases in the Pas de calais.<br/>
<br/>
Found the moon table for 1940. May need to correct times for UK as these may be US times, unless universal time= Zulu time=GMT??<br/>
<br/>
1940 Phases of the Moon<br/>
Universal Time<br ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Karri<br/>
<br/>
Well, well. I was on the verge of breaking through a Soviet line made of tank brigades, ready to begin the encirclement of a close to hundred Soviet divisions. All I needed was 3 or more combat rounds. So I planned my first round of combat, hit ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: ColinWright<br/>
<br/>
I think that the thing about <I><s>[i]</s>Seelowe<e>[/i]</e></I> is that while one can plausibly rearrange history to give it a fair chance of success, it remains a hair-raisingly risky proposition from the German point of view almost no ...

<r> The engineers just have a high movement allowance, so they seem to make it to gaps first. <br/>
<br/>
I am pretty sure some of my armoured combat units moving through friendly units hexes still get the disengagement penalty on occasion. German Armour doesn't work properly when its moving past ...

<t> Run out of slots to divide Divide units?<br/>
<br/>
Is that because its better to have lots of regiments than the divisonal equivalent? I have noticed that because of the way armor units cant move arround infantry (without getting tagged and possibly routed) I end up using MP's and pioneers to ...

<r> I am talking about the divisional Barbarossa that ends in Feb. 42, I have never played the MP only FITE, that does go on for the full 4 year stint <E>:-)</E><br/>
<br/>
For large multi-year scenarios a fixed proficiency is going to be strange. To be honest, after turn 7 or so the soviet units ...

<t> I get to turn 6 or 7 (playing Axis) and always get stopped cold. The PO USSR rails in entire armys and counter encircles any spearheads. If I don't probe to kill some of his rail links he just builds a huge wall of units.<br/>
<br/>
The units seem tough enough, breaking through is short term ...

<t> For Sealowe, does anyone know if the Germans considered making the evening of S-1 a day when there is maximium moonlight. <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
If it is a crystal clear night (fine weather) its more dangerous for a Royal Navy pre-emptive raid on french ports stacked with invasion barges.<br ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: pustak<br/>
<br/>
I'm looking for some p[ointers on effectively managing German airpower for the long haul. It seems as though fighter squadrons decline in number and effectiveness too quickly to get any consistent use out of them, but if I keep enough ...

<t> As mentioned above, it is easy to produce Tigers in higher numbers than was possible historically.<br/>
<br/>
It is not so much a cost per AFV problem, but a way too cheap (4) turn penalty to convert a factory from one equipment type to a grossly different type.<br/>
<br/>
The new tiger ...

<t> In the historical WWII Germany suffered a terrible defeat. IMHO using Historical OOB and linked availability dates for air wings and divisons is incorrect. <br/>
<br/>
This is because Germany did not totally mobilise her peacetime economy until after the defeat at Stalingrad. Her production of ...