I play on a netbook and it runs very well.

That's cool I didn't notice that in my small scenario.

I really like the netherland's flooding card that changed the map, great feature.

HQ effect overlay map similar to supply would be handy.

Rail destruction?

<t> I think this game hits a sweet spot between complexity and playability that others don't.<br/>
<br/>
It feels like a mix between an AGEOD game and an HPS game, with the cards a bit like selections in Wars in America, and the hex and unit feel of HPS. I like the battle system, and air and ...

I really enjoy the card system in this game, I can't recall ever seeing something like this used before, where specific units can be identified on the map. I wish this could be used in other games.

I'd say a scenario editor is a must have for this game. Keep the maps and campaign-linkages under the control of the developer, but open up the scenarios.

Would it be possible to edit/create cards as well?

Try the smaller scenario in the Netherlands, that's a good starter.

It would be interesting to hear how your game goes.

<t> I was feeling the same as marauder, I'd like to use this engine for other eras. I really like the way this game feels, and it runs on my netbook. TC2M and Scourge of War are great games, but I think this engine and UI would be really enjoyable to use. <br/>
<br/>
However, I know Panther games ...

Yes, Im saying COTA is accurate. I just wasn't sure about the PAKs and I was sure someone on the forums could enlighten me.

~Cheers

Thanks for that.

I think I've become confused by the strength of these AT guns as represented in other games, both paper-based and electronic.

I thought that COTA would have been up-to-speed with regards to accuracy.

Cheers,

<t> G'day, I've not had much experience with COTA handling tanks, but I'm wondering about the results others have observed. Today 1 Matilda held off two units of 3.7 paks and a number of infantry units over half a day. I only succeeded in getting them to surender by sending multiple units at it from ...

<t> I'm not sure I even know what part of this thread to reply to?<br/>
<br/>
XTC for music<br/>
<br/>
I'll go with Ginger Rogers as my postwar film star (although Veronica is hot)<br/>
<br/>
Oh, AACW is also a great game if we want to bring this thread anywhere near the original topic?<br ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Arjuna<br/>
I lost my house on that one.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I could possibly see losing my house over spending too much on wargames, but not from developing them, that's one I hadn't thought about. <br/>
<br/>
However, I'm thinking you must have ...

Robin, don't you have enough work over at BOA? You are over here working as well, are you looking for that end-of-year truffle bonus?

You deserve it. Great work!

They are my favourite type of ship too. I haven't gotten WPO, but I bet they are even more useful there. Anyone have any experience with that?

I think he's finally found out that some of us enjoy discussing the game rules more than actually playing the game.

It's a grognard thing.

<t> It's a game from another publisher, so I don't know if it is taboo to mention it, but Take Command 2nd Manassas is a very, very, good tactical Civil War game. It uses 2D sprites, has a great AI and is very modable. The developers at Mad Minute Games are very helpful and post on the forums daily ...

I'd go with printing a copy. It's handy to write notes on, and flip through as you play.

<t> So, you are not averse to allowing this sort of upgrading of the scenarios from HTTR to COTA via users?<br/>
<br/>
Anybody got a site to host all the upgrading? I'm new to the series, please forgive me if there are already several well-known support sites. I haven't come across them as yet.<br ...