<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Marc Schwanebeck<br/>
<br/>
Btw, that´s why we also recommend to register the product in the "Members Area", that way you can have them send to you at any time.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Thanks Mom[8|][;)]<br/>
<br/>
Thanks guys! I got the number and ...

<t> Wife threw away the paper w/ my serial number form original download. I checked my email but it had been deleted. I downloaded the game the first day it was out and wondered if there is any way I can find my original serial number so I can install the patch?<br/>
<br/>
BTW, just in case your ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: AlvinS<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Global setting of SOP and Reporting Frequency by unit type is great and being able to select an HQ to set SOP and have that filter to subordinate units is working well. (and saving a lot of time!)<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br ...

Agreed. MAybe just limit off screen ammo so that even on the 3rd (or 4th or whatever)Rest/Refit, it can't still be replenished after you've fired a certain number of barrages. (just make it alot becuase it IS the WP's only real advantage)

<t> I don't know, seems to me FPG is what it is....<br/>
Its not going to be at the Command and Staff College...but it is fun<br/>
<br/>
(Soft music plays in the background)<br/>
Before FPG, I never really played any TBS strategy games with the exception of Combat Mission. FPG got me hooked on ...

No, only "cool kids"[8D][;)]

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>4. My ad-hoc games are also having a weird combat resolution issue. I'll issue order, click procede, one unit will move, then I'll be dumped back out to orders. Then next procede fire off a full round of action. Appears to be a timing bug of some sort. Either the full turn ...

I PM'd you, let me know

<t> Form what I understand, they are modeled in the game. For instance, there is additional combat power for each mech inf unit when it is immobile to simulate deployable inf. weapons. For the upcoming patch, I believe Rob mentioned that there will be additonal bonuses for mech inf that is "holding ...

<t> I dont think you made a mistake trying to take the city...I think it was a great move. Generally though, you get some points for "occupying" a sector if you have more troops, but you get many more points if you "clear" it. SOmetimes, NATO gets more points for unit destruction (b/c WP has more ...

<t> As your opponent in this PBEM, I agree. The most effective attack was that which immediatly followed the artillery barrage. I didn't really move my units because they are NBC protected, but they WERE "suppressed" after your normal barrage following the chemical attack. Suppressed means that they ...

<t> Actually, it has occured on all of the PBEM games where I have received the scenarion from the other player. I don't know if it occures when I put together the scenario. If nobody else is noticing this, then obviously its something I'm doing and not the game.<br/>
<br/>
Although I do remember ...

<r> I'd be careful about adding WP units. True, they did have a 4:1 advantage in tanks...but NOT all of those tanks were first line T-80's (or even t-72's for that matter). Soviets rarely retired anything. An advantage of 4 T-80's for every M1A1 might be a little unrealistic.<br/>
<br/>
I'll tell ...

<r> Chelco, assuming that the doctrine now is manuever warfare (whateevr that is) when was it adopted to replace Airland battle?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Do you really think that the present-day US Army is going to beat sustained guerrilla operations in urban environments ...

<r> I'm not even going to try to go blow to blow with Chelco and Tbird3 on the details of maneuver warfare. [&o]<br/>
<br/>
My original comment was just that maneuver warfare is NOT the same as Air/LAnd Battle. Maneuever warfare may have existed long ago, but it doesn't seem to have been ...

<t> I'm going to bump this becuase it happened again in a new PBEM game I am playing. I was sent "Thin Blue Line" but received the mission briefing/briefing map/OOB for "A few Good Tanks". Again...not a show-stopper, but it seems like it would be easy to fix (assuming it is a bug and not something ...

<t> Seems more balanced than I thought. Although Poliorcetes noticed (as WP), as did I in another PBEM (as WP) that a WP force on assault will usually get shredded by a NATO unit on hold/screen; often without getting a shot off. Just seems...odd. I know the advantages to defense but on "assault" the ...

<t> Yes to both. I think unit balancing is good....better than I first thought. It's just that without recon, WP has to recon by force or by sacrificial Mech unit. Maybe a few recon units, better (or more effective) anti-air units for use against annoying NATO airstrikes, and more arty. All in all ...

Ahhhhh, its so nice to have purchased a game with great support.[&o]
tweak away, and remember that you can never have too many explosion graphics and sound effects...so don't be shy

Rob,

I am currently playing a PBEM game now where this is happening every other turn. I "uploaded" the file for you. Hope this works.