ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge
what is the point of not likeing the use of the D-6 ? all it is in game terms is a C with a belly drop tank
the C (until upgraded) could only carry the 200 gallon ferry tank, and to be honest, I don't want to give a 200 gallon drop tank, as there was more hassle to it then just saying it shouldn't carry 200 gallons of fuel
I agree with the why and why the planes would be repaired and upgraded, but it was a pretty standard thing, Maint troops in the 40's are not the same as current day
I been waiting for this one
and the number of USAAF bomber a/c available for ops (32 per Group as opposed to the more normally flown 18-24)
why ?
a Bomber Squadron was 4 planes ? 6 planes ?
USAAF a/c variants isn't my strong point, I don't know ever little difference between each variant, my only concern was that the USAAF FGs would be operating a latter version of an a/c than they did in real life but as they are the same in game terms then it's not a problem.
USAAF Heavy bomber groups consisted of 4 Sqns of 8 a/c = 32 a/c but only 3 Sqns normally flew on a mission, the 4th Sqn was rested (and the Sqns rotated). Usual Sqn requirement for a mission was 6 a/c on an op, flying spares would fill in gaps left by early aborts. Hence normal group committment for a mission was 18 a/c (you must have seen the diagrams for a combat box (18 a/c)). If it was a maximum effort (1st Schweinfurt) a Sqn would try and operate all 8 a/c with the 4th Sqns from each group forming composite groups but this was the exception rather then the norm. 18 a/c group formations were the norm through 43 into 44 when the combat box structure was revised
when I believe the 4th Sqn was incorporated


