RHS (CVO) 3.0 Kafkaesque Inconsistencies

[el cid again]

We are not supposed to include trainers. Wirraway is included for its combat role - and only the fraction involved in line units should be in the game. I probably have too many - 42 months times 12 = 504. The previous versions of the game had far more than were made!

[Herrbear]

ORIGINAL: AlaskanWarrior

ORIGINAL: Herrbear

I notice that the following units have Device 85 4.2in Mortar listed as a type 18 Naval Gun.

2001 USA Cavlary Div
2002 USA Infantry Div
2007 USA Infantry Rgt

Shouldn't their TOE be Device 430 4.2in Mortar listed as a type 19 Army Weapon.

nope, the US Army Divisions were not issued 4.2" mortars, they were only issued to Chemical Mortar Btns. In this the Stock scenarios are very much in error. However, they sure were not issued naval guns either.

Maybe they shouldn't be there, but in Sid's scenario 60, the three unit types listed above have the 4.2in Mortar in their slots. The first two (2001 and 2002) is located in slot 3 and the last (2007) is in slot 4.

[akdreemer]

ORIGINAL: Herrbear

ORIGINAL: AlaskanWarrior

ORIGINAL: Herrbear

I notice that the following units have Device 85 4.2in Mortar listed as a type 18 Naval Gun.

2001 USA Cavlary Div
2002 USA Infantry Div
2007 USA Infantry Rgt

Shouldn't their TOE be Device 430 4.2in Mortar listed as a type 19 Army Weapon.

nope, the US Army Divisions were not issued 4.2" mortars, they were only issued to Chemical Mortar Btns. In this the Stock scenarios are very much in error. However, they sure were not issued naval guns either.

Maybe they shouldn't be there, but in Sid's scenario 60, the three unit types listed above have the 4.2in Mortar in their slots. The first two (2001 and 2002) is located in slot 3 and the last (2007) is in slot 4.

Fair enough, however since el cid asked me to do the makeover for the US LCU's for his scenarios then something must have gone amok.

[el cid again]

Issuing release 3.3 - and there should be no such units in any scenario.

This update is mainly for eratta - particularly reworks Japanese submarines and many supply sinks for both sides - and a few other things,
as usual. It is to bring them in line with RHSEOS as well - which I will pre-release in not complete form today.

[Monter_Trismegistos]

(ver 3.35 CVO)

Location 087: JAAF 10th Air Div - Kwantung Army unit starting at Hamamatsu[Honshu]
Location 093: JAAF 6th Air Div - China Exped Army unit starting at Hamamatsu[Honshu]

These units are attached to restricted commands and are unable to get to their intended theatres of operations.

[TulliusDetritus]

RHS CVO 3.36

El Cid Again, SCR-270 Radars are not being produced. They have disappeared from the ressource/pool/etc. database. Intended? Maybe they were not produced on december 1941? They will "appear" later?

[el cid again]

ORIGINAL: Monter_Trismegistos

(ver 3.35 CVO)

Location 087: JAAF 10th Air Div - Kwantung Army unit starting at Hamamatsu[Honshu]
Location 093: JAAF 6th Air Div - China Exped Army unit starting at Hamamatsu[Honshu]

These units are attached to restricted commands and are unable to get to their intended theatres of operations.

In another life Monter must have been a rules lawyer:

he is right: for 4 scenarios this matters (PPO and ESO have political points and can transfer command at will) - so we cannot go with historical formation points AND historical command - a compromise is required - in this case make the units appear at Mukden and Shanghai

[el cid again]

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

RHS CVO 3.36

El Cid Again, SCR-270 Radars are not being produced. They have disappeared from the ressource/pool/etc. database. Intended? Maybe they were not produced on december 1941? They will "appear" later?

They should be produced - and at 200 times the rate in CHS!!!
BUT in RHS the radar does NOT produce in Dec 1941. In CHS ALL radar has a 4112 date setting - while in RHS the radars are staggered to represent different levels of technology. In this particular case, the radar begins production in July 1942.