New review from Gamespot

UFO: Extraterrestrials is a futuristic real-time/turn-based strategy blend set on the fictional planet of Esperanza in 2025. Having made a bloody first contact with a strange form of life from another planet, the player is thrust into the tough position of leading the defense of this isolated planet against the never-ending assault of these hostile invaders
User avatar
Hertston
Posts: 3317
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:45 pm
Location: Cornwall, UK

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by Hertston »

I'm afraid that one of the requirements for effective "comprehension reading" is something to read other than unintelligible gibberish. [8|]
User avatar
Marc von Martial
Posts: 5292
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany
Contact:

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by Marc von Martial »

ORIGINAL: ravinhood

Sorry Marc I see you couldn't even comprehend the 2nd post i made. lol Man, you really should go back to school and learn what comprehension reading is. Get a websters dictionary, oh that's right you don't believe in Websters definitions. lol

I guess a dictionary would have been helpful with your post too. All those typos, embarrassing.
User avatar
ravinhood
Posts: 3829
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:26 am

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by ravinhood »

Really Marc you know you drive more threads off topic than anyone else on your team. ;) At least I was talking about the review and how to review. You seem to only talk about ME....do yah LOVE me dat much? bats eyelashes. hahahahahah
WE/I WANT 1:1 or something even 1:2 death animations in the KOIOS PANZER COMMAND SERIES don't forget Erik! ;) and Floating Paratroopers We grew up with Minor, Marginal and Decisive victories why rock the boat with Marginal, Decisive and Legendary?


spadman
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:06 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by spadman »

I just thought I might pipe in and say that I think this is an extremely fun game. I play games like Half-life 2 and Day of Defeat and thus think graphics add to the game but I think the graphics in this game are trememdous for this kind of game.
I have seen a lot of people hit it for being ugly and I just dont see it. My little tank even left tracks in the grass on the map I was on last night.
Ultimately it is about fun and nothing (including the graphics) takes away from the fun.
I will admit I missed the XCOM bandwagon and all of its clones so this is the first time to try a game like this and I am just loving it.
I may even try other past games like this one, such as Silent Storm and Laser Squad.
Just thought everything was too negative in the gamespot review.
spadman.
Temple
Posts: 529
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 8:21 pm

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by Temple »

I'll chime in here too and say that I like it. Yes it could have used a better interface (but thankfully the hotkey mod works great) but the basic premise and implementation is sound. Sure, maybe you would like soldiers that die instead of going in hospital, but that's a design choice and I think it works quite well.

And while I did have two CTDs in the first three hours, I haven't had one in the twenty plus hours since. Maybe it really is related to the save game name length?

Anyway, if you are undecided, I would just say that it's a fun turn based squad combat game with a good strategy level business and resource management system as well. And while these things aren't usually mentioned in the usual reviews, the game has oodles of potential for modding. Well worth the price if you consider the hours of entertainment you get.
GalacticOrigins
Posts: 220
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Wolf 359

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by GalacticOrigins »

Yes, this game is addictive.
 
For all who are continuing to Whine and Moan and Complain, and have not yet bought the game ... Ah, um, well, the game is what it is, take it or leave it. Honestly, might as well play it and give it a try. Not buying the game for the reasons some have stated is, well, a 'choice'. Unless someone tries it they can't really assess it. Also, the original game was good, this is a little different, but both were fun. (Except, of course, the original was a tad easy.)
User avatar
ravinhood
Posts: 3829
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:26 am

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by ravinhood »

Welp now I know you didn't play the origional since you said it was a "tad easy" it was hardly a tad easy. It's why the game sits amongst the great ones out there because it isn't a "tad easy". Try again with your pumping this game up while not havinging played the origional. Probably didn't even buy it or own it. lol They do it to me, so, I'll just pass it along and do it to you. ;)
WE/I WANT 1:1 or something even 1:2 death animations in the KOIOS PANZER COMMAND SERIES don't forget Erik! ;) and Floating Paratroopers We grew up with Minor, Marginal and Decisive victories why rock the boat with Marginal, Decisive and Legendary?


Scott_WAR
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:27 pm

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by Scott_WAR »

Sorry rav, maybe your a little slow, or just suck at games, but the original was easy. Much easier than this version.
 
 
mjk428
Posts: 872
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:29 am
Location: Western USA

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by mjk428 »

ORIGINAL: Scott_WAR

Sorry rav, maybe your a little slow, or just suck at games, but the original was easy. Much easier than this version.



The original was only easy when played on "easy". Unfortunately the DOS version reverted to "easy" when loading a saved game. So lots of people were playing on easy and didn't know it.

UFO:ET may be harder. It probably is since it's expected to be played by XCOM vets but the original was not easy once patched. I know this because I've been playing it for the last week or so and losing half my soldiers each battle.
Scott_WAR
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:27 pm

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by Scott_WAR »

I played the original game on easy, and am playing this one on easy. There is a significant difference in difficulty between the two. The original Xcom was easier on easy than this game is.

Losing half your soldiers each battle wasnt much of a problem in the original since you were able to replace them anytime by hiring new soldiers. That is if you used the rookies as cannon fodder, sending them out first to draw fire.
Mister B
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:08 pm

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by Mister B »

You know, I miss the old days of recruiting hundreds of guys, hand picking the best stats, sending them thru Psi training, and dumping anyone who didn't have a good Psi stat. Them were the days. ;)
GalacticOrigins
Posts: 220
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Wolf 359

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by GalacticOrigins »

The original game was easy because you could build a super-sci base and research all the technology so fast it was unreal. Then, it was a matter of time to wait for bigger fish (ships) so more tech was available. Nice Months Game Over Any Difficulty. But then, my strategy was 'who cares about the battles, just pump up the tech!' since in the original game it was SO easy to get mega scientists.
 
One thing I like about the Hard difficulty in UFO:ET is that the lab rates cost quite a bit. Therefore, I tech slowly [:D]
User avatar
UndercoverNotChickenSalad
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Denial Aisle
Contact:

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by UndercoverNotChickenSalad »

I never played any earlier xcom games, and I think the game is very addicting.  I'm happy w/ the product.  I can't believe they rated it in the fives.  Is there some sort of a vendetta?  I've seen those guys rate shit games 6.7, where the reviewer has said basically "this game is a crashing, boring, worthless piece of shit, I give it 6.7"
 
The graphics are dated.  Do you realize what his means !?  It means even ppl who don't have a state of the art, superninja computer can still get the game and run it smoothly.
 
Oh well.  I guess ppl savy enough to look at gamespot are savy enough to read more than one review if they think a game looks cool and are thinking of buying it.  I always do.  I think the game is very good.  I'm angry w/ the difficulty I'm having installing mods for it [:@]  Somebody make an installer dangit.
Image
pmelheck1
Posts: 614
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Alabama

RE: New review from Gamespot

Post by pmelheck1 »

I own and have played all the previous xcom games.  I really like this game.  In my personal view this game does bring back some of the fun of the old X-Com games.  I have had the same of same experence of looking up and the clock after "just one more battle" and looking and the clock and remembering I have to work what is now today.  I feel for all those folks who were looking for the original X-Com with updated graphics but i'm really enjoying the feeling of discovery of playing the old X-Coms for the fist time.  while every game has good and bad points to me the good more than outweights the bad.  Their is some stuff i'd love to see and the mod community has done a wonderful job covering most if not all of these points, the reserve AP and kneel buttions to me being most welcome.  I'm currently enjoying the heck out of Bman's mod, he has done a fantastic job on it, you can switch on and off those mods you want to make the game more enjoyable for you.  As for instability, i've had only 1 or 2 CTD's in 1 week 1 to 2 too many but not what i'd consider bad.  As a recovering computer field tech i can only say check what programs are running in the back ground you may not be aware of, every program isn't allways compatable with every other program (there's just to many to test against).  May you have as much fun with this as i'm having and have a great day!
Post Reply

Return to “UFO: Extraterrestrials”