What's left for 1.9
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
-
Przemcio231
- Posts: 1901
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:39 am
- Location: Warsaw,Poland,EU:)
RE: What's left for 1.9
Fix the DEMAN replay and teleport BUGS[:@]
Pinky: Hey Brain what are we goeing to do this evening?
Brain: The Usual Pinky we will try to take over the World;)
RE: What's left for 1.9
additional clarification of the interface would be nice - they could do something like they did for aircraft replacement - state what the condition is currently, and then have the button next to it to change the condition.
I.e. - TF is currently docked
button - "undock".
Unit is currently accepting replacment
button - "turn replacements off"
(Right now, for LCUs the button reads replacements ON when there are replacements arriving.)
(Currently, as in example above sometimes clicking a button means to UNDO something, and at other times it means to DO something.)
I.e. - TF is currently docked
button - "undock".
Unit is currently accepting replacment
button - "turn replacements off"
(Right now, for LCUs the button reads replacements ON when there are replacements arriving.)
(Currently, as in example above sometimes clicking a button means to UNDO something, and at other times it means to DO something.)
RE: What's left for 1.9
Please make an Ai!!!!!!!! That works!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WitE2 - Alpha Tester/Beta Tester
Wite: 1.10 Beta Tester
Wite: Lost Battles Beta Tester
WitW - Beta Tester
Wite: 1.10 Beta Tester
Wite: Lost Battles Beta Tester
WitW - Beta Tester
RE: What's left for 1.9
ORIGINAL: DrewBlack
Please make an Ai!!!!!!!! That works!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't think that is going to happen in a patch... [:(]
RE: What's left for 1.9
The ability to tell Naval Attack bombers to ignore carriers and go for transports (specify targets)
There are two types of ships in the world
Submarines and Targets
D.B.F
Submarines and Targets
D.B.F
RE: What's left for 1.9
How about a Witp VERSION 2 with added Juicy Bits!!! " An Effective Ai", even I would pay good money for this!!!![&o]
Drew
Drew
WitE2 - Alpha Tester/Beta Tester
Wite: 1.10 Beta Tester
Wite: Lost Battles Beta Tester
WitW - Beta Tester
Wite: 1.10 Beta Tester
Wite: Lost Battles Beta Tester
WitW - Beta Tester
RE: What's left for 1.9
ORIGINAL: DrewBlack
How about a Witp VERSION 2 with added Juicy Bits!!! " An Effective Ai", even I would pay good money for this!!!![&o]
Drew
Oooh... how much?? [;)]
RE: What's left for 1.9
Show me a decent Ai...and I will show you the colour of my money... this game and its mods are superb!!! now its been around for so long you would expect a decent Ai to have been worked on..by the delveloper...So maybe a Witp GOLD!!! or 2 but i would pay a decent amount even full price[:D] if there was a version 2 in the pipe line....
No one ever seems to ask this!!! You would think with the amount of traffic on this board that it shows the interest is there in enough numbers to work on it...PLEASE....
Me for one would give it a go at playtesting....
Drew
No one ever seems to ask this!!! You would think with the amount of traffic on this board that it shows the interest is there in enough numbers to work on it...PLEASE....
Me for one would give it a go at playtesting....
Drew
WitE2 - Alpha Tester/Beta Tester
Wite: 1.10 Beta Tester
Wite: Lost Battles Beta Tester
WitW - Beta Tester
Wite: 1.10 Beta Tester
Wite: Lost Battles Beta Tester
WitW - Beta Tester
RE: What's left for 1.9
Sounds like a good idea.
-
Cpt Sherwood
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
- Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA
RE: What's left for 1.9
Fix ALL of the bugs. Even those that haven't been identified yet. [X(][&o]
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
RE: What's left for 1.9
ORIGINAL: Cpt Sherwood
Fix ALL of the bugs. Even those that haven't been identified yet. [X(][&o]
Nice trick!!
RE: What's left for 1.9
I would also pay for a WITP 2.
A nice AI would be nice, but I am just as happy playing PBEM.
A different land combat model would be a must.
A nice AI would be nice, but I am just as happy playing PBEM.
A different land combat model would be a must.
Appear at places to which he must hasten; move swiftly where he does not expect you.
Sun Tzu
Sun Tzu
RE: What's left for 1.9
ORIGINAL: DrewBlack
How about a Witp VERSION 2 with added Juicy Bits!!! " An Effective Ai", even I would pay good money for this!!!![&o]
Drew
Yeah, wouldn't hold your breath...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
RE: What's left for 1.9
For WiTP 2.0 (which I would pay a premium for), I would like to have:
1. An AI that doesn't interfere (much) when there is a real player for the side in question.
2. Better ground combat modelling--see the Gamers OCS system for what I mean. Probably key here is partial hex occupation, since the game mesh combines big 60 mile hexes with short 1 day turns.
3. Air operations defined in terms of number of sorties, not squadrons/groups launching as a whole.
4. Way points for naval movements. And three moves per day.
5. Timing taken more explicitly into account during air operations. I can provide sample C++ code for managing an event list.
6. A better map.
1. An AI that doesn't interfere (much) when there is a real player for the side in question.
2. Better ground combat modelling--see the Gamers OCS system for what I mean. Probably key here is partial hex occupation, since the game mesh combines big 60 mile hexes with short 1 day turns.
3. Air operations defined in terms of number of sorties, not squadrons/groups launching as a whole.
4. Way points for naval movements. And three moves per day.
5. Timing taken more explicitly into account during air operations. I can provide sample C++ code for managing an event list.
6. A better map.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
RE: What's left for 1.9
ORIGINAL: Terminus
ORIGINAL: DrewBlack
How about a Witp VERSION 2 with added Juicy Bits!!! " An Effective Ai", even I would pay good money for this!!!![&o]
Drew
Yeah, wouldn't hold your breath...
I do research in intelligent systems, and my response to Terminus is 'Amen, brother!'
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
RE: What's left for 1.9
Add new option to CS Convoy orders
A big "Click Count Reducer" would be a modification of the CS Convoy orders. A 'CS' convoys is where you form a transport TF, set a destination, then click on the 'Human Controlled' toggle, and it switches to 'CS Convoy' (or 'CS Controlled' or something). The TF will then robotically:
1 load supplies on AK's and fuel on TK's
2 take them to the destination
3 unload them
4 return to the home port
5 start over at #1
These types of convoys are great helpers in reducing the repetitive work load on the player (hence 'click count reducer'). The problem is that they cannot move oil or resources. And players must move a lot of oil and resources.
Please add an option so that a CS convoy can be told to either load "Supplies/Fuel" or "Oil/Resources".
For clarification please note that I am not referring to the auto convoy system.
A big "Click Count Reducer" would be a modification of the CS Convoy orders. A 'CS' convoys is where you form a transport TF, set a destination, then click on the 'Human Controlled' toggle, and it switches to 'CS Convoy' (or 'CS Controlled' or something). The TF will then robotically:
1 load supplies on AK's and fuel on TK's
2 take them to the destination
3 unload them
4 return to the home port
5 start over at #1
These types of convoys are great helpers in reducing the repetitive work load on the player (hence 'click count reducer'). The problem is that they cannot move oil or resources. And players must move a lot of oil and resources.
Please add an option so that a CS convoy can be told to either load "Supplies/Fuel" or "Oil/Resources".
For clarification please note that I am not referring to the auto convoy system.
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
RE: What's left for 1.9
ability to designate repair priorities and the like
make it more, flexible
make it more, flexible
RE: What's left for 1.9
[:)] How about the ability to priorize targeting , for task forces as well as aircraft? It seems like quite often a surface or air attack will concentrate on escorts and ignore high value targets (like carriers). Maybe a system wide priority arrangement if nothing else.[:)]
RE: What's left for 1.9
[8|]A thousand applolgies , I should have posted this under a different thread. Sorry.[8|]ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
[:)] How about the ability to priorize targeting , for task forces as well as aircraft? It seems like quite often a surface or air attack will concentrate on escorts and ignore high value targets (like carriers). Maybe a system wide priority arrangement if nothing else.[:)]