Cheers

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
I know...ORIGINAL: cantona2
Stukas did definitely did not have the range.
The closest airbases would have been in France, 1000 kms or so away and would have had to fly over Spanish, ie neutral, airspace.
ORIGINAL: Historiker
I know...ORIGINAL: cantona2
Stukas did definitely did not have the range.
The closest airbases would have been in France, 1000 kms or so away and would have had to fly over Spanish, ie neutral, airspace.
But still I don't understand it as well, why there weren't attacks by Ju 88 or other bombers with higher range. I even don't know about any serious aerial attack on Scapa Flow as well.
ORIGINAL: Dixie
ORIGINAL: Historiker
I know...ORIGINAL: cantona2
Stukas did definitely did not have the range.
The closest airbases would have been in France, 1000 kms or so away and would have had to fly over Spanish, ie neutral, airspace.
But still I don't understand it as well, why there weren't attacks by Ju 88 or other bombers with higher range. I even don't know about any serious aerial attack on Scapa Flow as well.
Possibly due to the fact that they would be unescorted as well as invading neutral airspace?
ORIGINAL: Historiker
There's no neutral country in front of scapa - [snip]
ORIGINAL: Dixie
ORIGINAL: Historiker
There's no neutral country in front of scapa - [snip]
I was only talking about Gibraltar. A raid against Scapa Flow would have taken quite a beating, even during the Battle of Britain with most of the RAF down South there were enough fighters in Scotland to defend against such a raid.
ORIGINAL: Dixie
ORIGINAL: Historiker
There's no neutral country in front of scapa - [snip]
I was only talking about Gibraltar. A raid against Scapa Flow would have taken quite a beating, even during the Battle of Britain with most of the RAF down South there were enough fighters in Scotland to defend against such a raid.