ORIGINAL: Q-Ball
I agree with all of that in terms of airpower, except for one thing.....
I don't see a big advantage to using the Helen over Sally. The capabilities are very similar, but Sally uses Mitsubishi engines, which you have plenty of, and the Helen uses Nakajima, which I prefer to use for fighters. I would like other thoughts, but I can't see a big difference between Sally and Helen.
Have others found the same thing?
I agree. For Japan this war is about economics. You have to save supplies and heavy industry to survive in later parts of the war. By using Sally through the war, you will save a lot of economic reserves, because you never run out of Mitsubishi engines. If you choose Helen, then you have to build more Nakajima engines, which you already have too few. Changing plants from Mitsubishi to Nakajima will eat too much supplies, HI and wasted production time.
The benefit of Helen is one maneuver or armor point stat. We all now that it's not enough against Corsairs (or any other high gun valued allied fighter). It's not worth it.




[/center]