Thai forces.

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
aciddrinker
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: Poland

Thai forces.

Post by aciddrinker »

How many of thai forces is added whit AE. There will be some restricted HQ for this LCU's if they be included?. And what about Japan puppet nations Navy? Thailand haved few old CL and DD's also some old SS, if i good remember manchuko haved also some small navy forces. Are this ships included also ?
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Andy Mac »

You get 6 weak Thai infantry divs and 1 weak Cav Div in AE plus an HQ and a small Aviation company
 
No air or naval vessels
 
Andy
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Andy Mac »

They are fully restricted and  recommend a house rule not allowing them to leave SEA
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7649
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Q-Ball »

Are there any Vichy French forces? Was the "Vietnam" special rule that created militia units in WITP amended or eliminated in AE?

What made me think of that is the Thai unit restrictions. Historically, I think the Japanese would have prevented the Royal Thai Army from moving into French Indochina, as that would anger the Vichy administration, which the Japanese needed to run things.
User avatar
HMS Resolution
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 3:31 pm

RE: Thai forces.

Post by HMS Resolution »

I thought most of the Thai navy was wrecked by the French at Koh Chang anyway.
Image
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7649
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Q-Ball »

They lost those two big Coast Defense Ships. They still had 7 TBs, 2 relatively new Sloops, and 2 gunboats, but keeping them out of AE was the right choice. They sat in port and did nothing anyway. An enterprising Japanese player could use them much more aggressively.
User avatar
Kereguelen
Posts: 1474
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 9:08 pm

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Kereguelen »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

Are there any Vichy French forces? Was the "Vietnam" special rule that created militia units in WITP amended or eliminated in AE?

What made me think of that is the Thai unit restrictions. Historically, I think the Japanese would have prevented the Royal Thai Army from moving into French Indochina, as that would anger the Vichy administration, which the Japanese needed to run things.

Vichy forces have not been included - apart from the coastal defense batteries at Haiphong, Cam Ranh and Saigon (which were controlled by the Japanese).

The VM militia units are still there, but they use their own squads + French equipment if triggered.

Thai forces - Historically interesting subject. We included them into the AE but still have some doubts if this was a wise choice despite the restrictions put on them. I'm quite sure that some players will find quite creative uses for them.
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Andy Mac »

I agree this was one of th ehardest calls we made and I am also still not convinced
 
Keep them in Thailand and everyone is happy !!!
Anonymous

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Anonymous »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball
They lost those two big Coast Defense Ships. They still had 7 TBs, 2 relatively new Sloops, and 2 gunboats, but keeping them out of AE was the right choice. They sat in port and did nothing anyway. An enterprising Japanese player could use them much more aggressively.

May we see pictures of the Thailand coast defense ships and others please, or the French ones.

MO
User avatar
HMS Resolution
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 3:31 pm

RE: Thai forces.

Post by HMS Resolution »

Image
 
 
Here's Dhonburi, anyway. Cute little thing.
Image
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7649
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Q-Ball »

Here is a good line drawing of Thonburi.....8in turrets

Image
Attachments
rysthonburi.gif
rysthonburi.gif (39.98 KiB) Viewed 819 times
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7649
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Q-Ball »

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

I agree this was one of th ehardest calls we made and I am also still not convinced

Keep them in Thailand and everyone is happy !!!

This seems like the best solution. From what I understand, they did nothing more than dip their toe in Burma, and hardly fired a shot all war.

I personally think Chinese Troops should also have house limits to reflect historical realities. No loading on ships, and not moving more than 300 miles or so from the Chinese border, basically Northern Burma, Vietnam, Outer Mongolia. I have read AARs with Chinese Corps wading ashore on Sumatra or Malaya, no chance of that IRL.
User avatar
tigercub
Posts: 2027
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 12:25 pm
Location: brisbane oz

RE: Thai forces.

Post by tigercub »

I agree the Thai Government as then and still today are all for Thai people and really don't care to much for outsiders hence they did not fight to much during the war keep to helping them selves, I know my wife to be is Thai.

Tiger!
Image
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7649
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Q-Ball »

OK, another question for the AE Developers along the same lines......

What do the Chinese Collaborationist and Manchukuo forces look like? I would think it's difficult to model forces that were very large on paper, and had some value as security troops, but virtually no value in any kind of real combat.

In certain WITP mods, the Japanese would start with some crappy Manchukuo units with experience levels of "10", but these would train up to acceptable combat ability within a few months.

Tough to model! What did you guys decide?
User avatar
afspret
Posts: 857
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:05 pm
Location: Hanahan, SC

RE: Thai forces.

Post by afspret »

Wasn't New Caledonia Vichy?  I seem to remember reading somewhere that they wouldn't co-operate with or let Ghormely set up his HQ on land in Noumea, but when Halsey took over, he really didn't give them a choice in the matter!  At the start of Scens 15 & 16 in WitP (the only ones I've played other than the tutorial),  Noumea and the surrounding bases all belong to the US and there is already a USN Base Force established @ Noumea.  So, if New Caledonia is Vichy, wouldn't it seem logical to have some French troops present?

I'm also going to buck the trend and say put all the Siamese land, naval & air units, along with those of Manchuokuo & the Chinese Collaborationist, at least in the data base (with 999999 arrival dates) and then let the players decided how or if to use them. 
John E. McCallum
User avatar
Jorm
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 5:40 am
Location: Melbourne

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Jorm »

ORIGINAL: afspret

Wasn't New Caledonia Vichy?  I seem to remember reading somewhere that they wouldn't co-operate with or let Ghormely set up his HQ on land in Noumea, but when Halsey took over, he really didn't give them a choice in the matter!  At the start of Scens 15 & 16 in WitP (the only ones I've played other than the tutorial),  Noumea and the surrounding bases all belong to the US and there is already a USN Base Force established @ Noumea.  So, if New Caledonia is Vichy, wouldn't it seem logical to have some French troops present?

I'm also going to buck the trend and say put all the Siamese land, naval & air units, along with those of Manchuokuo & the Chinese Collaborationist, at least in the data base (with 999999 arrival dates) and then let the players decided how or if to use them. 

No, new Caledonia wasnt 'vichy'. Some french controlled regions chose a semi independant path, not vichy but not wholey free french as defined by degaulle (sp?). Im sure one of our french WITP guys will be able to give correct details of the confused status of french units at the time.

User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Barb »

New Caledonia was in fact just deciding if to join Vichy or FFL. There were some talks and one Corvette (or gunboat or aviso or something smaller then DD) with pro-Vichy capitain. But after some talks they joined the allies in oct 1940. No bigger armed unit present - maybe security and police.
Image
User avatar
Skyland
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:30 pm
Location: France

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Skyland »

There was a small force with a coastal battery composed of four 95mm mle88 guns and two 20mm Oerlikon AA.
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: Barb

New Caledonia was in fact just deciding if to join Vichy or FFL. There were some talks and one Corvette (or gunboat or aviso or something smaller then DD) with pro-Vichy capitain. But after some talks they joined the allies in oct 1940. No bigger armed unit present - maybe security and police.

New Caledonia declared for Free France in mid-1940, after HMAS Adelaide scared off the Vichy Colonial Sloops that were requested by the Vichy governor. The governor subsequently turned over control to a pro-Gaulist committee, which was supported by the majority of the population.

Between then and mid-1941 a Pacific Marine Battalion was formed from volunteers (half from Tahiti) and sent to North Africa to fight with the allies. Also, a small Australian Engineer force (Robin Force) was installing two 6inch coastal guns at Quen Toro Hill, Noumea. The guns were provided by New Zealand, having been removed from old cruisers.

The French Garrision in New Caledonia was a weak battalion (7-800 men as I recall). Named New Caledonia Battalion (but in French) individuals within it wavered in loyalty to both Vichy and Free France. The unit did nothing to aid either side, and generally performed police duties (especially after the arrival of large US Army formations).

The two major Free French ships in the Pacific (excluding Indian Ocean) were:
the minesweeping sloop Chevreuil, based out of Tahiti but in New Caledonia waters when war began, and
the large destroyer Le Triomphant, attached to the Royal New Zealand navy but primarily operated with the Royal Australian Navy.

Another minesweeping sloop and one of the large colonial sloops were in the Indian Ocean, although I can be sure of the exact time frame. Also a former French Government cable laying ship that had previously laid international phone cables but was used to lay anti-submarine acoustic cables for harbor defense in various Indian Ocean bases.

Also a Free French Armed Merchant Cruiser, currently on the US West Coast (maybe refitting, don't recall off hand) and at least one Free French troop ship working with the British.

User avatar
Skyland
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:30 pm
Location: France

RE: Thai forces.

Post by Skyland »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen



Also a Free French Armed Merchant Cruiser, currently on the US West Coast (maybe refitting, don't recall off hand)


AMC Cap des Palmes was at Noumea in december 1941 and was transferring from dec 19th the japanese civilians living in New Caledonia to Australia. The refit occured only from Jan 43.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”