
Name This AE...356
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
Name This AE...356
???



SCW Beta Support Team
Beta Team Member for:
WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE
Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
- Hornblower
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
- Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago
RE: Name This AE...356
on of the atlanta's. one of the early abtch as ahe has the 2 beam mounted 5/38's..
RE: Name This AE...356
Did we have one earlier of the same location just a different angle?
- Cap Mandrake
- Posts: 20737
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
- Location: Southern California
RE: Name This AE...356
Looks like eucalyptus in the background.
Could be San Pedro (LA) or Point Loma (San Diego)...or Australia of course.
Graceful ship with her narrow beam.
Could be San Pedro (LA) or Point Loma (San Diego)...or Australia of course.
Graceful ship with her narrow beam.

- DuckofTindalos
- Posts: 39781
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
RE: Name This AE...356
Always loathed the Atlantas...[:@]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
-
Mike Scholl
- Posts: 6187
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
- Location: Kansas City, MO
RE: Name This AE...356
ORIGINAL: Terminus
Always loathed the Atlantas...[:@]
Any particular reason[&:] True the gun layout wasn't the most effecient, and more AAA directors would have been usefull..., but "loathed" is a pretty strong term.
- Fallschirmjager
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
- Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
RE: Name This AE...356
The class had its problems but by late 1942, every problem was corrected except the issue of being top heavy. Intermediate gun support was raised to effective levels. Firing arcs and direction was significantly improved.
Their surface combat record looks poor but the sample size is also so small that it is hard to draw any sort of conclusion from that. After the Solomon’s campaign surface the prospect of surface combat was so rare that the cruisers need not worry about it.
Their record in doing the job it was designed to do is superb. When tasked as a long range screening ship for fast carrier Tfs it excelled and shot down scores of Japanese planes and broke up countless other groups so that the close in ships could finish them off.
Their surface combat record looks poor but the sample size is also so small that it is hard to draw any sort of conclusion from that. After the Solomon’s campaign surface the prospect of surface combat was so rare that the cruisers need not worry about it.
Their record in doing the job it was designed to do is superb. When tasked as a long range screening ship for fast carrier Tfs it excelled and shot down scores of Japanese planes and broke up countless other groups so that the close in ships could finish them off.
RE: Name This AE...356
In my games the CLAAs prove particularly vulnerable to enemy aircraft attacks.[:@]
Appear at places to which he must hasten; move swiftly where he does not expect you.
Sun Tzu
Sun Tzu
-
rockmedic109
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
- Location: Citrus Heights, CA
RE: Name This AE...356
If that's eucalyptus in the background, it would have to be America. As I understand it, Eucalyptus does not grow as tall in Australia {less water}. My parents bought some Bushy Eucalyptus for their property line so they don't have to see their motel neighbors. Supposed to grow onlhy 20' high......They are well over 40' and are so thick they would qualify as a hedgerow.ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
Looks like eucalyptus in the background.
Could be San Pedro (LA) or Point Loma (San Diego)...or Australia of course.
Graceful ship with her narrow beam.
- Cap Mandrake
- Posts: 20737
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
- Location: Southern California
RE: Name This AE...356
ORIGINAL: kaleun
In my games the CLAAs prove particularly vulnerable to enemy aircraft attacks.[:@]
I dont think they have much deck armor. Pair them with a CA or prewar BB. The heavier ships will attract the majority of enemy planes and not suffer such grievous injury from dive bomb or level bomber attacks. If they are in a carrier TF they will largely be ignored by attacking aircraft but will boost AAA.
You do not want CLAA's as the flagship of invasion or transport groups.

- Hornblower
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
- Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago
RE: Name This AE...356
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ???????? After the CV's the first ships i pick for my Cv TF's are the Atlanta's.. Use them how they were intended - AA protection ..
- Cap Mandrake
- Posts: 20737
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
- Location: Southern California
RE: Name This AE...356
ORIGINAL: Hornblower
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ???????? After the CV's the first ships i pick for my Cv TF's are the Atlanta's.. Use them how they were intended - AA protection ..
Agreed. That is the best place for them.
My point is you do not want them the center of attention of of dive bombers or level bombers.

- Hornblower
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
- Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago
RE: Name This AE...356
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Hornblower
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ???????? After the CV's the first ships i pick for my Cv TF's are the Atlanta's.. Use them how they were intended - AA protection ..
Agreed. That is the best place for them.
My point is you do not want them the center of attention of of dive bombers or level bombers.
I will agree with you on that..
RE: Name This AE...356
The trees remind me a bit of Devonport naval base in Auckland, NZ.

When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
-
Mike Scholl
- Posts: 6187
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
- Location: Kansas City, MO
RE: Name This AE...356
ORIGINAL: Hornblower
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ???????? After the CV's the first ships i pick for my Cv TF's are the Atlanta's.. Use them how they were intended - AA protection ..
Actually the original design specs were for a Destroyer Leader/Flagship rather than an CLAA...., which accounts for what turned out to be it's poor armament layout. Had the consideration been AAA from the start, it's much more likely that there would have been two twin turrets forward, aft, and on each side..., with each pair having it's own AAA director. Less topweight and able to engage more targets simultaniously...
- Cap Mandrake
- Posts: 20737
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
- Location: Southern California
RE: Name This AE...356
Somebody needs to ID the Destroyer and perhaps the cruiser on the extreme left (bow just visible) and the barge so Brady can tell us where this is.

- Cap Mandrake
- Posts: 20737
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
- Location: Southern California
RE: Name This AE...356
It is,USS Cassin
It is,USS San Diego
............
Mare Island Navy Yard, California, 9 April 1944.

SCW Beta Support Team
Beta Team Member for:
WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE
Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
-
anarchyintheuk
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: Dallas
RE: Name This AE...356
ORIGINAL: Brady
It is,USS Cassin
It is,USS San Diego
............
Mare Island Navy Yard, California, 9 April 1944.
Discovered by the Germans in 1904. They named it San Diago, which of course in German means a whale's vagina.






