Name This AE...356

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

Name This AE...356

Post by Brady »

???






Image








Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Hornblower »

on of the atlanta's.  one of the early abtch as ahe has the 2 beam mounted 5/38's..
User avatar
joey
Posts: 1532
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Johnstown, PA

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by joey »

Did we have one earlier of the same location just a different angle?
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Looks like eucalyptus in the background.

Could be San Pedro (LA) or Point Loma (San Diego)...or Australia of course.

Graceful ship with her narrow beam.
Image
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Always loathed the Atlantas...[:@]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: Terminus
Always loathed the Atlantas...[:@]


Any particular reason[&:] True the gun layout wasn't the most effecient, and more AAA directors would have been usefull..., but "loathed" is a pretty strong term.
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Fallschirmjager »

The class had its problems but by late 1942, every problem was corrected except the issue of being top heavy. Intermediate gun support was raised to effective levels. Firing arcs and direction was significantly improved.

Their surface combat record looks poor but the sample size is also so small that it is hard to draw any sort of conclusion from that. After the Solomon’s campaign surface the prospect of surface combat was so rare that the cruisers need not worry about it.
Their record in doing the job it was designed to do is superb. When tasked as a long range screening ship for fast carrier Tfs it excelled and shot down scores of Japanese planes and broke up countless other groups so that the close in ships could finish them off.
User avatar
kaleun
Posts: 5144
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 10:57 pm
Location: Colorado

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by kaleun »

In my games the CLAAs prove particularly vulnerable to enemy aircraft attacks.[:@]
Appear at places to which he must hasten; move swiftly where he does not expect you.
Sun Tzu
rockmedic109
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by rockmedic109 »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

Looks like eucalyptus in the background.

Could be San Pedro (LA) or Point Loma (San Diego)...or Australia of course.

Graceful ship with her narrow beam.
If that's eucalyptus in the background, it would have to be America. As I understand it, Eucalyptus does not grow as tall in Australia {less water}. My parents bought some Bushy Eucalyptus for their property line so they don't have to see their motel neighbors. Supposed to grow onlhy 20' high......They are well over 40' and are so thick they would qualify as a hedgerow.
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: kaleun

In my games the CLAAs prove particularly vulnerable to enemy aircraft attacks.[:@]

I dont think they have much deck armor. Pair them with a CA or prewar BB. The heavier ships will attract the majority of enemy planes and not suffer such grievous injury from dive bomb or level bomber attacks. If they are in a carrier TF they will largely be ignored by attacking aircraft but will boost AAA.

You do not want CLAA's as the flagship of invasion or transport groups.
Image
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Hornblower »

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ????????  After the CV's the first ships i pick for my Cv TF's are the Atlanta's.. Use them how they were intended - AA protection ..
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ????????  After the CV's the first ships i pick for my Cv TF's are the Atlanta's.. Use them how they were intended - AA protection ..

Agreed. That is the best place for them.

My point is you do not want them the center of attention of of dive bombers or level bombers.
Image
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Hornblower »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ????????  After the CV's the first ships i pick for my Cv TF's are the Atlanta's.. Use them how they were intended - AA protection ..

Agreed. That is the best place for them.

My point is you do not want them the center of attention of of dive bombers or level bombers.

I will agree with you on that..
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by DivePac88 »

The trees remind me a bit of Devonport naval base in Auckland, NZ.
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ????????  After the CV's the first ships i pick for my Cv TF's are the Atlanta's.. Use them how they were intended - AA protection ..



Actually the original design specs were for a Destroyer Leader/Flagship rather than an CLAA...., which accounts for what turned out to be it's poor armament layout. Had the consideration been AAA from the start, it's much more likely that there would have been two twin turrets forward, aft, and on each side..., with each pair having it's own AAA director. Less topweight and able to engage more targets simultaniously...
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Somebody needs to ID the Destroyer and perhaps the cruiser on the extreme left (bow just visible) and the barge so Brady can tell us where this is.
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Cap Mandrake »




Maybe a Benson class.
Image
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by Brady »



It is,USS Cassin

It is,USS San Diego

............

Mare Island Navy Yard, California, 9 April 1944.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
anarchyintheuk
Posts: 3958
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Name This AE...356

Post by anarchyintheuk »

ORIGINAL: Brady



It is,USS Cassin

It is,USS San Diego

............

Mare Island Navy Yard, California, 9 April 1944.


Discovered by the Germans in 1904. They named it San Diago, which of course in German means a whale's vagina.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”