Directive 21 playtesters thread

Norm Koger's The Operational Art of War III is the next game in the award-winning Operational Art of War game series. TOAW3 is updated and enhanced version of the TOAW: Century of Warfare game series. TOAW3 is a turn based game covering operational warfare from 1850-2015. Game scale is from 2.5km to 50km and half day to full week turns. TOAW3 scenarios have been designed by over 70 designers and included over 130 scenarios. TOAW3 comes complete with a full game editor.

Moderators: ralphtricky, JAMiAM

User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10111
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by sPzAbt653 »

2nd Panzer Army has made the closest progress to Moscow. Rather than continue towards the capital, the panzer divisions should probably strike north in order to pocket the Soviet forces around Vyazma-Mozhaysk.

Image
Attachments
D21mv6.jpg
D21mv6.jpg (179.79 KiB) Viewed 205 times
User avatar
BigDuke66
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Terra

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by BigDuke66 »

So your running a winter offensive?
Should the German side be capable of such an operation?
User avatar
cesteman
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 4:40 am
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by cesteman »

Cant wait for a product to use :)
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10111
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by sPzAbt653 »

So your running a winter offensive?
Should the German side be capable of such an operation?


I don't see why not.
Cant wait for a product to use :)


We are working on monitoring how well Elmer does in his defense (with the recent objective track schemes and use of the EEV). Beyond that it seems we are pretty much done with this, so it may not be long. [:)]
User avatar
BigDuke66
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Terra

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by BigDuke66 »

Because the German Army wasn't even prepared for the winter at all not to speak of making an offensive.
User avatar
cesteman
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 4:40 am
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by cesteman »

I have to agree with the above post. What's the negative shock for the first winter?
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10111
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by sPzAbt653 »

What's the negative shock for the first winter?

At turn 42 the Axis Shock Level is 115%. At turn 43 (Nov 41) it goes to 100%. At turn 73 (Feb 42) it goes to 105%.

I wouldn't say I'm having an offensive in Jan-Feb 42, it's more like an advance to contact (as you can see in the above post with the screen shot of 2nd Panzer Army). Also keep in mind that the mistakes made by the Wehrmacht in Aug-Oct 41 put them in the bad position they were in at Dec 41.
User avatar
BigDuke66
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Terra

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by BigDuke66 »

And the Russian shock values?

Is the AI in no position to make a winter offensive?
User avatar
cesteman
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 4:40 am
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by cesteman »

I think they have some shock for a few winter turns, I just can't remember what it is for V653.
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10111
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by sPzAbt653 »

The Soviet Shock Level goes to 115 on turn 49 (early Dec), and stays there until turn 61 (early Jan). This Winter Offensive is on a turn range, so the player doesn't know exactly when it will start.
User avatar
cesteman
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 4:40 am
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by cesteman »

Nice to know. I assume it will show up in the news report when it's active?
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10111
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by sPzAbt653 »

I seem to remember that it does not. I do remember that all of sudden the Axis units are weaker, and then the Soviets start attacking and you can't hold ground. And it goes on for 10 or so turns. It sucks, but that's life on the East Front.
User avatar
cesteman
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 4:40 am
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by cesteman »

Agreed on the life sucking part. Is there any way to let either player know via the new feed when their shock goes up? Knowing me, I would pay attention to losses until three turns after the fact!
TPOO
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:23 pm
Location: Garden Grove, CA

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by TPOO »

Also, the Axis Shock Level drops to 95% at the start of the Soviet Offensive and recovers to 100% at the end.
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10111
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Turns 57-69

Post by sPzAbt653 »

Is there any way to let either player know via the new feed when their shock goes up?

It's difficult to justify because how does an officer know when the troops will perform differently? But ... in the scenario the Axis is notified of shock value changes because otherwise the player doesn't know what is going on (and that is a playability issue). And ... eventually the officers would get word from the front as to what is going on.

No news for the Soviet side though. Elmer doesn't need it (PO Bias is used to calm him down when things are rough, and to kick him in the pants when things are good). We felt that putting Soviet Shock values in the news strings gives the human player an unfair advantage. [:(]
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42791
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

D21 playtesters thread

Post by larryfulkerson »

Hey you guys I downloaded the latest ( I think ) version of D21 and am taking a look around planning my first turn as the Axis and I found out that the RR arty has to be put in rail mode before it can move at the railroad rate. But when the equipment is aboard the train it can't fire. I'm not sure I like that. Seems as though I remember that in FITE you could shoot with your RR arty and didn't have to switch modes to move it because it only had one mode: the RR-moving mode. And further, the D21 RR arty can be moved off the rail lines. Cross-country RR arty doesn't seem right to me. I'm wondering why the unit is deployed like this and how much trouble it would be to "fix" it. Or....maybe you can explain why it's good just the way it is.

Anybody?

Image
Attachments
RR_arty_in_D21.gif
RR_arty_in_D21.gif (93.87 KiB) Viewed 205 times
Russia’s 41st Army COLLAPSED in Pokrovsk — 25,000 Soldiers KILLED After a RIDICULOUS Russian Assault
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_CtW3GqPQg
User avatar
Veers
Posts: 1324
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:04 am

RE: D21 playtesters thread

Post by Veers »

$20 says that the modder felt that railroad arty that could dart and dash about firing and then moving, and then firing was not realistic, as prep time was involved before those bad boys could fire. Probably supposed to be a House Rule that they can only move on rail.

But I could be wrong...:D
To repeat history in a game is to be predictable.
If you wish to learn more about EA, feel free to pop over to the EA forums Europe Aflame Forums.
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10111
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: D21 playtesters thread

Post by sPzAbt653 »

But I could be wrong

But you could be right ... and are!

Hey Mr. Fulkerson, I just sent you the latest file.

Looking into the railroad guns that the Germans used, I came across two things of interest: 1, it took a lot of time and effort to move most of these guns around, and more time and effort to set them up. 2, the total number of shells that some of them fired is pretty low, and some of them were restricted by a limited number of available shells.

As Veers said, to have them represented with a movement allowance over 200, and with unlimited firing ability, didn't seem very good. So we 'fixed' them so that their movement now takes away from the Axis rail capacity (I'd like to make them heavier), they have limited movement because they have to embark/debark, and they have limited rates of fire (due to their low movement allowance). Yes, they can move off rail (actually some did historically, as they were railed to a location and then moved into position by tractor). It's the one downside to the overall situation, but moving them off-rail isn't much fun, as they can only move a little, and if the Russkies catch them they are goners.
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42791
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

RE: D21 playtesters thread

Post by larryfulkerson »

Oh......okay.  Now that you've explained the reasoning behing the deployment it makes sense.  Thanks for that enlightenment.  By the way, the version of D21 that I'm playtesting is dated August  15, 2009.  I'm going to start over ( since I'm only on turn 2 so far ) and use the newest version.  I've uploaded it to a file server and all you guys can find the latest version of D21 at this address:

http://www.mediafire.com/?uamodnczzbm

Thanks to sPzAbt653 and TP00 for all their hard work on D21.
Russia’s 41st Army COLLAPSED in Pokrovsk — 25,000 Soldiers KILLED After a RIDICULOUS Russian Assault
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_CtW3GqPQg
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10111
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: D21 playtesters thread

Post by sPzAbt653 »

Thanks to sPzAbt653 for all his hard work on D21

Thanks Mr. Fulkerson, but ... no love for Rick 'TPOO' ??

He and I are sharing the playtesting and modding efforts. [:)]

And for your efforts I will give you some top secret intel [8D]. There is a gap in the Soviet defense between the Don River and the rivers Donetz/Oskol. We've decided that we wanted that area to have some sort of defense, no matter what the overall situation, so we're fixing it up this weekend. But for now, the major crossings from Voroshilovgrad (192,232) north to Novy Oskol (179,207), and the area between there and the Don River, are fairly undefended.

Cheers!
Post Reply

Return to “Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III”