FOW on/off... from what I've tested

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Tatoune
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:47 am

FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Tatoune »

I think this is the greatest strategy game I ever played. But from now, I need answers cause I feel a bit disapointed from what I've tested. And btw, I did not found any thread on this, so here I am.

From the manual: FOW « When turned on, both players will receive incomplete or faulty messages and reports concerning enemy ship, troop, and air group damage, as well as limited data on enemy bases. If left off, all enemy units will be visible on the map at all times. »

Now, I play the Guadalcanal scenario to learn the game and I'm only on my 3rd turn with advanced weather and FOW. Based on my operational reports, there was several ennemy fleets spotted by my planes, so I've focused on those fleets trying to engage them with no success and even if one of the spotted fleet, 7 japanese ships, was 1 hex from my CV set 100% on search.

After several attemped reloading to try different recipe, I've decided to reload from the last day played and turned OFF the advanced weather and FOW and ran a turn just to see my CV in action. What a surprise, ALL the fleets supposed to be spotted were not there, I mean no one out of a dozen fleets supposed to be on the lower half of the map, and tracked from 2 days. Instead they were all at the upper half of the map. A completly different game... My first though... something is wrong... this is ridiculous cause so much work spent on analysing the operational reports. And why give my trace route of a fleet two days in a row if it's not true....?

From the operational report, none of the info is correct when set FOW on. And I can post the 2 reports FOW on/off if needed. You'll see 2 different games.

Does someone have a idea what's going on?
User avatar
Grfin Zeppelin
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Germany

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Grfin Zeppelin »

The fleet you spoted, did it have an on map Icon ?

Image
medicff
Posts: 710
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:53 pm
Location: WPB, Florida

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by medicff »

ORIGINAL: Tatoune

I think this is the greatest strategy game I ever played. But from now, I need answers cause I feel a bit disapointed from what I've tested. And btw, I did not found any thread on this, so here I am.

From the manual: FOW « When turned on, both players will receive incomplete or faulty messages and reports concerning enemy ship, troop, and air group damage, as well as limited data on enemy bases. If left off, all enemy units will be visible on the map at all times. »

Now, I play the Guadalcanal scenario to learn the game and I'm only on my 3rd turn with advanced weather and FOW. Based on my operational reports, there was several ennemy fleets spotted by my planes, so I've focused on those fleets trying to engage them with no success and even if one of the spotted fleet, 7 japanese ships, was 1 hex from my CV set 100% on search.

After several attemped reloading to try different recipe, I've decided to reload from the last day played and turned OFF the advanced weather and FOW and ran a turn just to see my CV in action. What a surprise, ALL the fleets supposed to be spotted were not there, I mean no one out of a dozen fleets supposed to be on the lower half of the map, and tracked from 2 days. Instead they were all at the upper half of the map. A completly different game... My first though... something is wrong... this is ridiculous cause so much work spent on analysing the operational reports. And why give my trace route of a fleet two days in a row if it's not true....?

From the operational report, none of the info is correct when set FOW on. And I can post the 2 reports FOW on/off if needed. You'll see 2 different games.

Does someone have a idea what's going on?

In addition to incomplete reports you might actually get a faulty report of your own tf in the area reported as the enemy. Did you have anything in the area?
Tatoune
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:47 am

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Tatoune »

@Grafin Zeppelin No, does that mean I canot rely on the report until the icon is on the map?

@medicff, yes my cv from 1 hex and my plane give me the info
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by pompack »

I have had my own subs reported as enemy carriers more than once

It all depends on what the search pilots were drinking the night before [:D]
Tatoune
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:47 am

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Tatoune »

I did another test, after 1 more turn, now my SBD-3 and Avenger search 100% :start 180 End 290. Now they spoted submarine which is around 30 degree, and I can see the Sub icon. Why? They were not supposed to fly that way. I'm getting more and more confused
User avatar
tocaff
Posts: 4765
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:30 pm
Location: USA now in Brasil

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by tocaff »

Torpedo juice....that stuff will make you go blind.
Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
zace
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:46 am

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by zace »

I did another test, after 1 more turn, now my SBD-3 and Avenger search 100% :start 180 End 290. Now they spoted submarine which is around 30 degree, and I can see the Sub icon. Why? They were not supposed to fly that way. I'm getting more and more confused

Was it within 4 hexes of the searching base?

Search is 360 degrees for the first 4 hexes.
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by freeboy »

I understand, BUT u will LOVE fow when in pbem.. I sunk Kaga at leas t5 times!
FYI You will get better, more accurate reports as the game goes on and your pilots, skippers know there duties a little better....

"Tanks forward"
Tatoune
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:47 am

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Tatoune »

ORIGINAL: zace
I did another test, after 1 more turn, now my SBD-3 and Avenger search 100% :start 180 End 290. Now they spoted submarine which is around 30 degree, and I can see the Sub icon. Why? They were not supposed to fly that way. I'm getting more and more confused

Was it within 4 hexes of the searching base?

Search is 360 degrees for the first 4 hexes.

Correct, my CV is 3 hex from the SS, and my planes are set max range (8). BTW what kind of rule is this, I dont get it. If I want my planes to go north, why do I get a 120 milles info from south? Does this have something to do with radar?
Menser
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: Peabody, Massachusetts

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Menser »

Zace
4 hexes from the searching base has 360 coverage?
I only read in the manual that concentrated searches have a higher probability of detection than a 360 search.
Where did you get that info from?
"Alea iacta est." Caius Julius
"If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing." Emo Philips
"Caedite eos! Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius." Abbot Arnaud Amalric
zace
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:46 am

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by zace »

board search....  There was a large discussion on it this past week.

I don't remember which forum or subforum it was in. Sorries :(
Tatoune
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:47 am

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Tatoune »

Sunk a ship 5 times??? What kind of report is this. In real life, when my boss ask me to do some reports, I try to make it the best way I can.

From my game, when my planes tells me 2 days in a row that there is 7 japanese ship around a point, and then without fow a realise there is nothing there, I call this big issue. And btw, the pilots got enough experience, so this should not be the problem.

minnowguy
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: St Louis

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by minnowguy »

I recall several episodes in _The First Team_ where search aircraft reported drifting barges and even stationary rocks as enemy task forces -- IIRC the USN even launched an alpha strike on the barge.  My guess is that many, many hapless whales and schools of big fish were attacked and reported by aircraft on ASW patrol.  When a pilot is looking for something it is human nature to "find" it given even the slightest excuse.

There were many cases on both sides when damaged carriers were reported as sunk.  This happened when hit reports were over-optimistic -- i.e. near misses reported as hits, near misses by bombs reported as torpedo hits, etc. -- and when multiple strikes on the same task force were reported or analyzed as strikes on different task forces.  Remember that much of the navigation was dead-reckoning, performed by pilots trying to fly at the same time as they juggled their maps and instruments and trying to apply less than perfect wind information.  Finally, an enemy task force moving at flank speed can cover a good bit of ocean between sighting reports.

Based on a good bit of reading about the historical air war in the Pacific, I think the FOW-influenced reports are pretty realistic. 

Lifer
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2003 3:37 am
Location: East Coast, USA

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Lifer »

Even though you may see the enemy TF on your screen, your planes won't attack until the detection level is high enough.  Basically you get a free look but no greater DL to go along with it.
Man does not enter battle to fight, but for victory. He does everything that he can to avoid the first and obtain the second.
Ardant du Picq
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by freeboy »

ok, sunk Kaga, my ships planes torpedo her, she sinks... or does she? I find out later I justscratched her up, or I sunk another ship and not Kaga... So, I may still see Kaga again... you are frustrated, BUT the not knowing gets beter when you can confirm kills and thisis much more art than science...
good luck
"Tanks forward"
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by PzB74 »

Many unnecessary "fake" FOW reports in AE...some may be submarines but unless there is an actual TF icon on the map you should ignore the spotting reports as FOW.
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Grfin Zeppelin
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Germany

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Grfin Zeppelin »

FOW is what makes this game better than others(among other things)No complete knowledge of whats going on adds so much to this game imo.

Image
User avatar
Wirraway_Ace
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Austin / Brisbane

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Wirraway_Ace »

Ignore spotting reports that don't result in a high enough DT to place a TF symbol on the map.
 
Pay close attention to messages like, "TF22 snooped by enemy torpedo bomber". 
Tatoune
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:47 am

RE: FOW on/off... from what I've tested

Post by Tatoune »

Ok I'm calm now. [8D] Even if I dont know much about historic of ww2, you did have some good explanation and I will keep this in my mind. Just a last comment, instead of reading:

"SBD-3 Dauntless sighting report: 7 Japanese ships at 117,134 near Auki, speed 11, Moving East"

it would be great to read:

"SBD-3 Dauntless sighting report: Maybe 7 Japanese ships at 117,134 near Auki, speed 11, Moving East"

until better DL, and then forget about the maybe. Just to make the difference about what is certain. Anyway, I understand fow now. Thank

Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”