What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

findmeifyoucan
Posts: 579
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:11 pm

What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by findmeifyoucan »

I just started a new GC scen 2 as the Japanese.

No air strikes or spotting of the Repulse or Prince of Whales, 7% damage only to the airbase at Clark Field. Playing the historical turn. What is going on? This is not historical is it?
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by witpqs »

What makes you think it has anything to do with the new update?
findmeifyoucan
Posts: 579
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by findmeifyoucan »

So you have seen this happen before where the Japanese Air Force completely misses the British Battlefleet TF on Dec 7 historical turn?
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by LoBaron »

Damnit. Sacrilege!

And on the attack on PH only 2 BB´s where sunk instead of 5! FIX THIS! [:D]
Image
CV2
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:49 pm

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by CV2 »

ORIGINAL: findmeifyoucan

So you have seen this happen before where the Japanese Air Force completely misses the British Battlefleet TF on Dec 7 historical turn?

Yes.
User avatar
noguaranteeofsanity
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:28 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by noguaranteeofsanity »

ORIGINAL: findmeifyoucan

So you have seen this happen before where the Japanese Air Force completely misses the British Battlefleet TF on Dec 7 historical turn?

Yes, I've had various results with TF Z, including it being sunk, damaged or even survive the start of the war. The same is true for the attack on PH, where results can vary with each restart.

Sounds like you are thinking the "Historical First Turn" option, essentially recreates history exactly as it happened, when in fact, that is not how it works. All it does really, is prevent human players from issuing orders on the first turn.
erstad
Posts: 1944
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by erstad »

nm

User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by LoBaron »

findmeifyoucan, if you want exact historical dec 7 you have to use the dec 8 scenario.

Image
Marcus_Antonius
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:35 pm

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by Marcus_Antonius »

The "historical" outcome would involve the POW and the Repluse sunk on the 10th.
 
I have also seen a variety of PH attack outcomes (out of the box). Everything from 2 BB's sunk to all of them sunk after the first day attack.
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by fcharton »

I started a GC1 scenario with the allies after the update, and had both PoW and Repulse sunk on that first day. The damage at PH was low, but this also happened before.

One thing I have noticed, over about 10 days, though, is that the Japanese AI seems to be slightly less agressive at start. It waited a couple of days before attacking HK (therefore letting most of the boats there escape unscathed), did land in Luzon and Khota Baru, but waited more than usual for southern Philippines, and Northern Borneo. After 10 days, only Miri was attacked, Kuching has yes to see enemy boats or planes. Same goes for China.

It also seems less agressive in the airs. The first air attacks on the Philippines were unescorted bombers, mostly, very little happened over burma, northern Sumatra, and even Singapore.

On the other hand, invasion task forces seem to be slightly better organised.

Globally, this "first week feel" under the new patch felt a bit quieter than before. Of course, this is based on just one game... Did others feel the same?

Francois
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by LoBaron »

There are a couple of different AI opening moves and skripts.

So different AI behaviour has nothing to do with the patch, it would happen also if you restart a game against the AI
several times under the same patch.


Edit: It could be that Andy made some changes to existing AI skripts or added some details though, not that it is listed in the patch notes...
Image
User avatar
Mundy
Posts: 2867
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2002 6:12 am
Location: Neenah

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by Mundy »

This isn't really an AI issue here, since I'm the Allied victim in this game with findmeifyoucan.
 
We were one day into this when the new patch came out, so being that it was database-heavy, we decided to restart.  I was lucky the first time around in that PoW came through untouched that time.  Repulse, on the other hand...
 
Ed-
Image
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by LoBaron »

Concerning the OP it does not matter whether its against the AI or PBEM.
The moment you hit the turn button the dice begins to roll... [;)]
Image
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by fcharton »

Andy Mac commented on having updated the AI scripts on some other threads, so yes, it might reflect changes there. I think the change in the land based radar logic, by allowing more defending fighters to scramble during an enemy air raid (which makes fighter planes even more important in the game), might have played a role too, or have triggered the need to adjust the AI.

Edit : If you play with "historical first turn" on, then the first turn is an 'AI turn', since you can't input orders.

Francois

User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by LoBaron »

Good point. The Radar bug fix is one of the best things in the patch besides the huge DB updates...
Image
Tijanski
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:31 pm

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by Tijanski »

ORIGINAL: a_gonatas
The "historical" outcome would involve the POW and the Repluse sunk on the 10th.

I have also seen a variety of PH attack outcomes (out of the box). Everything from 2 BB's sunk to all of them sunk after the first day attack.
I think even the "historical" December 8 start just means historical as of morning of December 8. That is my usual scenario to play from, but have seen a variety of attack outcomes against TF Force-Z on the next unrestricted turn.

Btw, I remember reading something about some moded scenarios that attempt to make the first few turns act in a more historical way, like placing TF Force-Z on its historical course. Does anyone know which these are, and has anyone had experience with them? Thanks in advance.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16098
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by Mike Solli »

Hell, I've had KB not attack on 7 Dec 41. Go figure. Just the wrong end of the bell curve. [:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10645
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: LoBaron

Good point. The Radar bug fix is one of the best things in the patch besides the huge DB updates...

+1

Huge fix ....
Pax
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: noguaranteeofsanity

ORIGINAL: findmeifyoucan

So you have seen this happen before where the Japanese Air Force completely misses the British Battlefleet TF on Dec 7 historical turn?

Yes, I've had various results with TF Z, including it being sunk, damaged or even survive the start of the war. The same is true for the attack on PH, where results can vary with each restart.

Sounds like you are thinking the "Historical First Turn" option, essentially recreates history exactly as it happened, when in fact, that is not how it works. All it does really, is prevent human players from issuing orders on the first turn.

I've had Task Force Z show up at the landing beach and proceed to sink Haruna and put Kongo out of action...oh yes, it can happen. [:@]
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: What have the designers done to the game with this new update?

Post by John Lansford »

In my CG Repulse took a torpedo hit but made it back to Singapore, and I sent PoW down to Brunei to intercept shipping there.  She sank Fuso in a close in night engagement, then Chiyoda, and made it safely back to Singapore.  She later was torpedoed off of Java but I got her to Perth and then to Cape Town for repairs.  Repulse sneaked out of Singapore before it fell with about 60 flotation damage and limped to Ceylon and then Cape Town as well.
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”