Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

After having joined the beta team and being able to play with what was developing to be the upcoming patch, I got the itch to challenge who I felt to be another highly competent player, Flaviusx. As the board's foremost proponent on aggressive Soviet tactics, and all-around expert on Soviet play, I felt that in addition to my game against ComradeP, if I could defeat Flaviusx, then I would truly prove to those who doubt that the Axis have a chance, that they do, indeed.

That, or I'm just craving a good a$$-whooping...[:D]

Anyhow, it would be an important stress-test of the new patch's changes to see how the morale effects will play out. I still think that the Soviets have the most to gain from the changes, as the engine still allows resting and refitting units to increase their unit morale, up past their National Morale, potentially to 75 morale. Since the early war Soviets have such atrocious National Morale, they can benefit much more than the bulk of the Axis units - the Germans, whose National Morale is much closer to this cap.

Like my game with ComradeP, this game is with random weather, full FoW, and starting HQs locked.

The AAR for the opening turn in this game will follow closely with that other, Tres Amigos Uno!, since my first turn strategic direction, and execution of combats are essentially the same. How much the game diverges, depends on what happens after turn one, but for now, you can probably note a great deal of similarities between the screenshots in this thread and found here (follow link).

Sorry, Pieter...no peeking there...[;)] I'll let you know when it is safe to view the first page of the thread.

Thus, I'll dispense with much of the commentary in this thread's first few posts, and do more as the games diverge from their roughly equivalent starts.

This screenshot shows the air losses.


Image
Attachments
JvF Axis00..irLosses.jpg
JvF Axis00..irLosses.jpg (150.52 KiB) Viewed 510 times
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

As mentioned in the other thread, the goal here is to carve out corridors for the infantry to advance, cross the Dvina, and pocket Soviets.

Image
Attachments
JvF Axis001endNorth.jpg
JvF Axis001endNorth.jpg (233.07 KiB) Viewed 510 times
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

The Center. Pocketing of Soviets near Bialystok/Grodno, converging on Minsk, and a motorized division to clear the routed Soviets out of the Pripyet Marshes before they recover.

Image
Attachments
JvF Axis001endCenter.jpg
JvF Axis001endCenter.jpg (267.48 KiB) Viewed 510 times
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

AGS...as before, going it alone, other than GD Regiment to augment 1st Pz Gp. Likewise, the cutting of the railway to the SE of Stanislaw, to prevent the Soviet units near the Carpathians from easily escaping, and to allow the Rumanians to activate on Turn 2. I'll be interested to see how much Flaviusx attacks here.

Image
Attachments
JvF Axis001endSouth.jpg
JvF Axis001endSouth.jpg (301.51 KiB) Viewed 510 times
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

The big picture, with the Germanic Gargoyle facing to the East, ready to devour the Russian Bear...[:D]

Image
Attachments
JvF Axis001endLarge.jpg
JvF Axis001endLarge.jpg (336.83 KiB) Viewed 510 times
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

Finally, ground losses for the end of the turn.

Image
Attachments
JvF Axis00..ndLosses.jpg
JvF Axis00..ndLosses.jpg (175.45 KiB) Viewed 510 times
User avatar
BletchleyGeek
Posts: 4460
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Living in the fair city of Melbourne, Australia

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by BletchleyGeek »

And another subscription here...
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7850
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by Q-Ball »

I never thought of sending a Mot Div into the Marshes. Interesting. The fact that you can't rail-out Routed units anymore should help in rounding up Reds.

Why not form pockets in AGS? You can bag 6 divisions or so around Kovel without using any Mobile units, and you can bag the whole Lvov pocket. This does require borrowing a Pz Corps from Pz Gp 2.
User avatar
british exil
Posts: 1686
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 6:26 pm
Location: Lower Saxony Germany

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by british exil »

+1

Looking forward how the turns differ. The first turns are roughly 100% indentical. Flav and Pieter ought to have a few surprises in store for you.

Mat
"It is not enough to expect a man to pay for the best, you must also give him what he pays for." Alfred Dunhill

WitE,UV,AT,ATG,FoF,FPCRS
jjdenver
Posts: 2480
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:07 pm

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by jjdenver »

Ah, I'm quite happy to see JAM writing an AAR. I've played other games with him in the past and really he's a topnotch player so of all the AAR's on display - this and his other AAR are by far the ones I'm most keen to see play out. Thanks JAM for posting it. :)
AARS:
CEAW-BJR Mod 2009:
tm.asp?m=2101447
AT-WW1:
tm.asp?m=1705427
AT-GPW:
tm.asp?m=1649732
ComradeP
Posts: 6992
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by ComradeP »

Interesting opening move.

I wonder if, with Riga captured, you could transport one or more divisions there by sea, similarly to how some people drop infantry off at Ventspils. That would be quite nice.

I'm not sure what Flavio's intentions will be, he has quite a different playstyle. Mine might actually be more aggressive than his early on.

With the fairly large number of changes, I won't actually be able to prove many of the things I intended to prove, as many of the things they covered have been changed, but I think both Flavio and me can still show what the Soviets are capable off, even though it's more difficult than before to do so.

Good luck in this game and in the game against me.
SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by Mynok »


Once again, you do not have to cut the rail near Stanislaw to stop Soviet rail escape. They cannot use the rail that runs along the Rumanian border for rail movement.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7850
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by Q-Ball »

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

Interesting opening move.

I wonder if, with Riga captured, you could transport one or more divisions there by sea, similarly to how some people drop infantry off at Ventspils. That would be quite nice.

I tried this, doesn't work. In fact, it doesn't work turn 2 or 3 either, maybe because the Reds will still occupy Moon Island.[&:]

Even if it was Turn 2, you could use it to move some troops closer to the front, and save a bunch of time.

Would be nice, but no dice.......
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Once again, you do not have to cut the rail near Stanislaw to stop Soviet rail escape. They cannot use the rail that runs along the Rumanian border for rail movement.
Good point, however, the conversion of those hexes displaces more routed units, and prevents the units near Stanislaw from getting any further east than Chernovetsy, which allows them to be pocketed on turn two when the Rumanians/11th Army link up with 17th Army/1st Pz Gp.
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

Interesting opening move.

I wonder if, with Riga captured, you could transport one or more divisions there by sea, similarly to how some people drop infantry off at Ventspils. That would be quite nice.

I'm not sure what Flavio's intentions will be, he has quite a different playstyle. Mine might actually be more aggressive than his early on.

With the fairly large number of changes, I won't actually be able to prove many of the things I intended to prove, as many of the things they covered have been changed, but I think both Flavio and me can still show what the Soviets are capable off, even though it's more difficult than before to do so.

Good luck in this game and in the game against me.
Hi Pieter. Thanks!

Yeah, after all the changes, I'm not sure what I'm trying to "prove" anymore, either. Other than the Axis aren't as hosed as so many think they are. I fully expect you and Flavio to do your best to make the proof as difficult as possible...[;)]
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by Mynok »

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Once again, you do not have to cut the rail near Stanislaw to stop Soviet rail escape. They cannot use the rail that runs along the Rumanian border for rail movement.
Good point, however, the conversion of those hexes displaces more routed units, and prevents the units near Stanislaw from getting any further east than Chernovetsy, which allows them to be pocketed on turn two when the Rumanians/11th Army link up with 17th Army/1st Pz Gp.

As long as you have a reason for it. When I use that approach in the south, I tend to use mostly infantry to pocket Lvov while the armor goes north to pocket Rovno and units west of it. That's why I like having the cavalry unit in the swamps to be the 'pocket closer for the armor.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

Hey Flavio, please don't open this thread. Thanks.
User avatar
cookie monster
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Birmingham,England

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by cookie monster »

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM

Hey Flavio, please don't open this thread. Thanks.

Caught red-handed LOL.

I see him in here too![X(][:D]
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by JAMiAM »

ORIGINAL: cookie monster

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM

Hey Flavio, please don't open this thread. Thanks.

Caught red-handed LOL.

I see him in here too![X(][:D]
Yeah...funny that. It's the cookies that give him away...[:D]
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Tres Amigos Dos! JAM v Flaviusx (no Flaviusx)

Post by Ketza »

He came, he saw, he left.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”