End of AAR 76mm welcome

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Soviet attacks - he increased his attacks as well as opened up assaults along the Mius river.

Image
Attachments
76mm93combats.jpg
76mm93combats.jpg (87.4 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Losses his turn - Still a good ratio.

Image
Attachments
76mm93co..tlosses.jpg
76mm93co..tlosses.jpg (32.72 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Air losses his turn - His offensive against my bases continues. Good portion of losses are recon planes which is fine.

Image
Attachments
76mm93airlosses.jpg
76mm93airlosses.jpg (36.41 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

2nd Panzer launches some local attacks and meets some success. I could have created a small pocket here.

Image
Attachments
76mm932ndpanzer.jpg
76mm932ndpanzer.jpg (60.84 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Air losses during my attacks

Image
Attachments
76mm93airlosses2.jpg
76mm93airlosses2.jpg (33.14 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Losses from 2nd and 3rd Panzer attacks

Image
Attachments
76mm932n..attacks.jpg
76mm932n..attacks.jpg (33.08 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

3rd panzer attacks near Mius river line

Image
Attachments
76mm932n..dPanzer.jpg
76mm932n..dPanzer.jpg (75.93 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Spring 1943 Mud!

95% of my frontline divisions are in static mode. By clear weather I will be back up to 500 APs in my pool for reaction to his offensives. I have a reserve of infantry divisions for reaction/offensive activities of around 25 full strength 100% toe infantry divisions. This is my attrition casualties per turn a far cry from 35-40k per turn I saw before. His attrition is still pretty heavy as his frontline units are not static.

He has withdrawn a lot of his corps from the front so who knows where he will strike this summer.

Image
Attachments
attrition.jpg
attrition.jpg (32.5 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Balou
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:12 pm

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Balou »

This is my attrition casualties per turn a far cry from 35-40k per turn I saw before.

"Before": in 41/42 ? Or before you went static in 42/43 ?
“Aim towards enemy“.
- instructions on U.S. rocket launcher
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Peltonx »

Static mode lowers atrition loses that much?

Pre 1.05 2.6 to 1 ratio was enough to grind down German Army.

I am guessing based on your data that thats not good enough for the Russian now. He will have to lower the ratio to 2.25 to 1. Your doing better then that with armor forses so if you counter attack allot more you will weaken hes forses long run. Also with the lower attrition your in good shape.

Can you give me an idea when he started attacking to the mud turn what your total troop count was?

Also is your gun numbers holding steady?

Hes got to get you down to 2.3 million men before your army breaks. Hes got a long long ways to go at his slow rate of attack. If hes only attacking 10 to 20 hexes a turn thats not enough to break you. Hes got to attack all along the long. 50+ a turn and that would take atleast a yr I am guessing if not more.

Hoooper took about 30 turns and I only had 3.o million men and about 25 to 30% of his attacks per turn were 1v1=2v1. He lost 1/2 the none 1v1=2v1 attacks, but because of the huge arm output back then he knew it would pay off in long run.

If you could track your and his losses, total guns and troops for 10 turns. If you post the OOB an dead list the first turn of summer and then 10 turns later I can figure it out for myself.

The trend will give you a guess at how things will long 40 or 50 turns down road

Pelton
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
karonagames
Posts: 4701
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:05 am
Location: The Duchy of Cornwall, nr England

RE: Winter 1942

Post by karonagames »

It is good to see that Static mode can play a role in attrition management. While I doubt I would be brave enough to put 95% of the front into static, it looks like at 50% a substantial boost to manpower will be available.
It's only a Game

User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Attrition this turn was really low. When the front went mud a few turns ago was when I really kicked the static way up as an experiment.



Image
Attachments
76mmattrition2.jpg
76mmattrition2.jpg (51.16 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Turn 98 OOB - everything increasing slowly for me but so are his categories.

Image
Attachments
oob.jpg
oob.jpg (42.68 KiB) Viewed 335 times
lycortas
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:23 pm

RE: Winter 1942

Post by lycortas »

What scares me about playing this game is a look at those German AFV numbers... nearlly 6000!!! Unbelievable! Aircraft die like flys in this game although they still kill way to many tanks but tanks do not die enough.
In '42 the Russians kept dipping under 3000 AFVs.

Mike
That's no moon, it's a space station!
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Looking over my AFVs and I found this to be odd. Is this accurate to have that many Panthers in so many divisions in the Spring of 43?

Image
Attachments
panthersa.jpg
panthersa.jpg (61.43 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4854
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: Winter 1942

Post by M60A3TTS »

According to a source I read, by Army orders, 250 Panther D's were to be ready by mid-May. Another 600 were finished by September 1943.
juret
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: Winter 1942

Post by juret »

looks like many panthers. U are lucky ketza .  I got a game on turn 92 and i got 200 panthers d. and looking at reinforcements i can see we get 2 panther bats with 96 each begining may and 20 produced each turn in addition to those.
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Lots of delays in the game but its still going!

May 1943 -

Italians took a hit and I am taking them out of the line. Germany holds strong numbers wise. Panzers are in great shape the LW not so much.

Image
Attachments
76mmmay1943oob.jpg
76mmmay1943oob.jpg (41.27 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

May 1943 production

Image
Attachments
76mmmay1..oduction.jpg
76mmmay1..oduction.jpg (133.83 KiB) Viewed 335 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Winter 1942

Post by Ketza »

Last turns losses. I think the number is blown up from Italian disbands. I could not view any combats in the file nor did any show up on the map.

Image
Attachments
76mmmay1943losses.jpg
76mmmay1943losses.jpg (34.42 KiB) Viewed 335 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”