Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
- ny59giants
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
List the LCUs, their ID numbers, and at start locations so it can be looked at.
[center]
[/center]
[/center]- Dan Nichols
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:32 pm
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Not all of these are important, but there are some that a player might want to move on turn 1. I am not sure
what happens if you load them on a amphibious TF. I think they might land and take supplies that are loaded with
them, but I am not sure about that.
4276 - Babeldaob
4409 - Babeldaob
4275 - Etotofu
4209 - Etorofu
3583 - Harbin
3601 - Harbin
3776 - Liaoyuan
4724 - Marcus Island
3361 - Paramushiro-jima
4283 - Peleliu
4278 - Saipan
4280 - Saipan
4411 - Saipan
4081 - Sendai
4908 - Shirmushiri-jima
3676 - Sunwu
3683 - Sunwu
4723 - Takamatsu
4177 - Tatung
4274 - Truk
4410 - Truk
4273 - Yokohama/Yokosuka
In addition the following HQs have no LCU support but require it
5 Northeast Area fleet - Ominato
16 Combined Fleet - Saipan
17 1st Fleet Naval HQ - Hiroshima/Kure
18 2nd fleet - Samah
19 3rd Fleet - Babeldaob
20 4th Fleet - Truk
22 6th fleet - Kwajalein Island
23 Southwest fleet - Cam Ranh Bay
27 Southeast Area Fleet - Truk
28 china Area Fleet - Shanghai
what happens if you load them on a amphibious TF. I think they might land and take supplies that are loaded with
them, but I am not sure about that.
4276 - Babeldaob
4409 - Babeldaob
4275 - Etotofu
4209 - Etorofu
3583 - Harbin
3601 - Harbin
3776 - Liaoyuan
4724 - Marcus Island
3361 - Paramushiro-jima
4283 - Peleliu
4278 - Saipan
4280 - Saipan
4411 - Saipan
4081 - Sendai
4908 - Shirmushiri-jima
3676 - Sunwu
3683 - Sunwu
4723 - Takamatsu
4177 - Tatung
4274 - Truk
4410 - Truk
4273 - Yokohama/Yokosuka
In addition the following HQs have no LCU support but require it
5 Northeast Area fleet - Ominato
16 Combined Fleet - Saipan
17 1st Fleet Naval HQ - Hiroshima/Kure
18 2nd fleet - Samah
19 3rd Fleet - Babeldaob
20 4th Fleet - Truk
22 6th fleet - Kwajalein Island
23 Southwest fleet - Cam Ranh Bay
27 Southeast Area Fleet - Truk
28 china Area Fleet - Shanghai
I think that the two obligations you have are to be good at what you do and then to pass on your knowledge to a younger person
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
The LCUs should be fine. The bases all start with supply so that isn't any big deal. Loading anything from those bases will automatically load supply as well.
I am playing a 4.0 (Japan) and a 4.1a (Allies) and everything looks good. Neither of my opponents have said anything about an issue like this.
What do you mean regarding the HQ requiring LCU Support?
I am playing a 4.0 (Japan) and a 4.1a (Allies) and everything looks good. Neither of my opponents have said anything about an issue like this.
What do you mean regarding the HQ requiring LCU Support?

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
- Dan Nichols
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:32 pm
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
They have a support requirement, but no support or mechanized support.


- Attachments
-
- combinedfleet.jpg (191.91 KiB) Viewed 383 times
I think that the two obligations you have are to be good at what you do and then to pass on your knowledge to a younger person
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Hmmm...Michael do you think this is an issue?

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
- ny59giants
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Just talked with John, he will make adjustments overt he next few days.
[center]
[/center]
[/center]- BigBadWolf
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:01 am
- Location: Serbia
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Can you guys take a look at devices 1467 Sound Detector? It doesn't upgrade to anything. Shouldn't its upgrade path be 1468 Tai-Chi 13 Radar?

RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
I am in the process of making a comprehensive list of items that need to be checked. ANYONE playing RA who has a questions or has seen an issue, please chime in!
Right now these are items I am aware of:
1. Support Issues alluded to earlier.
2. Need to check the Vietnamese Inf Div issues.
3. Will check BB Wolf's question above.
Are there other things needing to be checked and/or changed?
Right now these are items I am aware of:
1. Support Issues alluded to earlier.
2. Need to check the Vietnamese Inf Div issues.
3. Will check BB Wolf's question above.
Are there other things needing to be checked and/or changed?

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
- khyberbill
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
- Location: new milford, ct
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
I haven't seen anything obvious yet. But I am having so much fun that I might be missing something. Great Job Guys! I like the new placement of the Banshees and the Pensacola. This works for me.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
- ny59giants
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Allied early war recon airframe production.
Static Japanese BFs get some engineers.
Garrison devices for India Command HQs upgrade to non-static device on 1/43 to allow mobility.
Mentioned to John, but so others known about them
Static Japanese BFs get some engineers.
Garrison devices for India Command HQs upgrade to non-static device on 1/43 to allow mobility.
Mentioned to John, but so others known about them
[center]
[/center]
[/center]RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Bill--glad you like the 4.0 changes.
Michael's notes added to the list.
Michael's notes added to the list.

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
- khyberbill
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
- Location: new milford, ct
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
I am ready for a re-match!Bill--glad you like the 4.0 changes.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Will be doing work on Wed-Thurs to get these changes made. Will update as I go.
Does anyone have additional thoughts as to things that need to be looked at?
Does anyone have additional thoughts as to things that need to be looked at?

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
- ny59giants
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Look at Prince of Wales AA values and her radars at start. The AA is very high, IMO. [X(] The ranges for her two radar sets appears to be off.


- Attachments
-
- PrinceOfWales.jpg (158.97 KiB) Viewed 392 times
[center]
[/center]
[/center]RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
ORIGINAL: BigBadWolf
I just got some of the much feared Vietnamese militia emergency reinforcements and they are static? Why are they static?
Hey BBW.
I am working on the Mod. Can you give me the EXACT unit location number for each of the VM Militia. In scenario two Michael has them coming in location slot 3000-3003.
The problem in RA is that I put the 1st, 2nd, 3rd Air Flotillas in those slots creating a conflict. Am now moving those three units to 2990-2992 but need the VM locations.

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Notes for RA 4.2:
1. Added minor amounts of support to Japanese Fleet HQ.
2. Bumped Allied recon production numbers.
3. Added 2 Eng Vehicle and 6 Eng to Static BF in Japan: minimal building/construction ability.
Working on VM Militia.
Have I missed any other topics?
1. Added minor amounts of support to Japanese Fleet HQ.
2. Bumped Allied recon production numbers.
3. Added 2 Eng Vehicle and 6 Eng to Static BF in Japan: minimal building/construction ability.
Working on VM Militia.
Have I missed any other topics?

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
The version of RA mod is getting to 4.2?
The title of this topic should be changed, haha.
The title of this topic should be changed, haha.
- MrBlizzard
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:34 pm
- Location: Italy
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Hi,
I'm playing as Jap RA 4.1, I found that some Eng Units lack a device (e.g. the 2th JNAF Coy; unit nr. 4402, based in Babeldaob). In the tracker the device missing is named (DEV 717, unknown device).

I'm playing as Jap RA 4.1, I found that some Eng Units lack a device (e.g. the 2th JNAF Coy; unit nr. 4402, based in Babeldaob). In the tracker the device missing is named (DEV 717, unknown device).

- Attachments
-
- Immagine.jpg (157.81 KiB) Viewed 392 times
Blizzard
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
Ohhhhhhh...good catch. Let me take a look. Thanks for the screenshot.

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1
I've sent the files to Stansilav for RA 4.2. Am still looking at Mr. Blizzard's issue but will be gone for most of the rest of the week so I thought getting this out was preferable.
Changes made as detailed above with one addition.
Michael suggested we move up the Squadron 803 arrival to Dec 7th. I agreed so there are 8 (can fillout to 12) Fulmar's starting at Trimcomalee. They may be moved to Hermes immediately if wished by the Allied player. Not much but it is something.
Changes made as detailed above with one addition.
Michael suggested we move up the Squadron 803 arrival to Dec 7th. I agreed so there are 8 (can fillout to 12) Fulmar's starting at Trimcomalee. They may be moved to Hermes immediately if wished by the Allied player. Not much but it is something.

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.






