GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T61 center (Soviet)


Crucial attack designed to save encircled stack failed.

Image
Attachments
61sovc.jpg
61sovc.jpg (560.49 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T61 far south - west (Soviet)


I need to counter movement of Italian mountain divisions.

Image
Attachments
61sovfsw.jpg
61sovfsw.jpg (141.2 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T61 far south - east (Soviet)


More units on the way, so I should be able to stabilize front line.

Image
Attachments
61sovfse.jpg
61sovfse.jpg (251.96 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T62 far north (German)


Turn of nasty surprises.

I forgot about Finnish panzer divisions, but thanks to Saper's courtesy I remember now. :)

Image
Attachments
62gerfn.jpg
62gerfn.jpg (181.29 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?

Back then Kamil had a carpet of lvl 3 -5 forts and the manpower hit was not in effect yet.

This game was per 1.06.13 so Kamil would have never been muled to death. Those days are over.

There is a HUGE HUGE difference before .13 and after .13.

The logistics has 100% been chaanged forever an so has the game. Its like comparing apples to a cow pattie.

Same as Hooopers 1v1=2v1 and TDV's uber russian blizzard O pocketing 50 german divisions ( got nerfed with the HQ patch)

1941 is very close to historical now, games are desided in 1942 now.

Beta Tester WitW & WitE
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T62 center (German)


Very successful turn for Axis. I will have to extract encircled units at all cost - another 2 inf corps and 4 inf divisions on the top of what he destroyed that turn (1 inf corps and 2 inf divisions) would massively help his cause of capturing Moscow.

Image
Attachments
62gerc.jpg
62gerc.jpg (380.1 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T62 far south (German)


I will be able to reopen corridor to trapped units.

I was very surprised to find out last turn that my divisions got isolated due to distance to rail-head. I guess this battle seen best performance of soldiers from Italy since Zama :)

Image
Attachments
62 ger fs.jpg
62 ger fs.jpg (238 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

quote:
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?

Pelton

Back then Kamil had a carpet of lvl 3 -5 forts and the manpower hit was not in effect yet.

This game was per 1.06.13 so Kamil would have never been muled to death. Those days are over.

There is a HUGE HUGE difference before .13 and after .13.



Oh Pelton, Pelton.

You are rewriting history so it can suit You.



In THIS game there was muling, look at initial turns first ...
Kamil
Fishbed
Posts: 1827
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:52 am
Location: Henderson Field, Guadalcanal

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by Fishbed »

I see he's manning the lines with regiments (!) northwest of Moscow, along your bulge... Don't you want to spare a couple corps or strong units to give him a bloody nose there? Every fuss you'll do in the vicinity of Moscow will help your cause at saving The Kremlin...
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

Fishbed

I see he's manning the lines with regiments (!) northwest of Moscow, along your bulge... Don't you want to spare a couple corps or strong units to give him a bloody nose there? Every fuss you'll do in the vicinity of Moscow will help your cause at saving The Kremlin...


I do not have enough reserves for any kind of offensive (especially in unfavorable terrain), my main task is containing his panzer thrusts.
Kamil
User avatar
HITMAN202
Posts: 714
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:10 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by HITMAN202 »

A few questions..

1) Has Sapper been "grinding you down" like Pelton mentioned in other AAR's ?? What I think he means are straight up attacks that don't necessarily attempt to form pockets.

2) What has been the German/Soviet loss ratio ?? Seems other AAR's point to a 1/3 ratio or better achieves a definite German advantage.

3) If Sapper had conducted a more sensible blizzard defense (retreat more) would the additional troops and better morale now make a major (significant) difference ???
WITE is a good addiction with no cure.
hfarrish
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:52 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by hfarrish »


This is now up there with the M60 / Farfarer AAR as one of the most interesting and instructive on the board...keep up the good work!
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: Kamil
quote:
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?

Pelton

Back then Kamil had a carpet of lvl 3 -5 forts and the manpower hit was not in effect yet.

This game was pre 1.06.13 so Kamil would have never been muled to death. Those days are over.

There is a HUGE HUGE difference before .13 and after .13.




In THIS game there was muling, look at initial turns first ...

Thats what I said.

Really not sure what your talking about.

You drinking when you read my post?

I will let you reboot and try again.

Beta Tester WitW & WitE
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

HITMAN202

A few questions..

1) Has Sapper been "grinding you down" like Pelton mentioned in other AAR's ?? What I think he means are straight up attacks that don't necessarily attempt to form pockets.

2) What has been the German/Soviet loss ratio ?? Seems other AAR's point to a 1/3 ratio or better achieves a definite German advantage.

3) If Sapper had conducted a more sensible blizzard defense (retreat more) would the additional troops and better morale now make a major (significant) difference ???


1 - No he hasn't, and I think that was mistake, between turns 7-14 I was for the taking. He focuses on pockets and won't omit even smallest prey.

2 - 3:1, plus over 250 destroyed divisions

3 - yes, I would have been on brink of major defeat
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T62 far north (Soviet)


Thanks to arrival of reinforcements and luck I managed to break encirclement.

Image
Attachments
62sovfn.jpg
62sovfn.jpg (239.47 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T62 centrer (Soviet)


Moscow area was massively reinforced thus successful counter-attacks were possible. I think situation here is under control.

Image
Attachments
62sovc.jpg
62sovc.jpg (673.31 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T62 south (Soviet)


Western approaches to Stalingrad are safe.

Image
Attachments
62sovs.jpg
62sovs.jpg (400.08 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T62 far south-west (Soviet)


Careful withdrawal.



Image
Attachments
62 sov fsw.jpg
62 sov fsw.jpg (125.93 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T62 far south-east (Soviet)


I think I managed to contain Saper's panzers.

Image
Attachments
62sovfse.jpg
62sovfse.jpg (184.84 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 1877
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T63 far north (German)



Pocket was resealed, and ring of encirclement is stronger now.

Image
Attachments
63gerfn.jpg
63gerfn.jpg (140.06 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Kamil
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”