Crucial attack designed to save encircled stack failed.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21




ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?


quote:
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?
Pelton
Back then Kamil had a carpet of lvl 3 -5 forts and the manpower hit was not in effect yet.
This game was per 1.06.13 so Kamil would have never been muled to death. Those days are over.
There is a HUGE HUGE difference before .13 and after .13.
Fishbed
I see he's manning the lines with regiments (!) northwest of Moscow, along your bulge... Don't you want to spare a couple corps or strong units to give him a bloody nose there? Every fuss you'll do in the vicinity of Moscow will help your cause at saving The Kremlin...
ORIGINAL: Kamil
quote:
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?
Pelton
Back then Kamil had a carpet of lvl 3 -5 forts and the manpower hit was not in effect yet.
This game was pre 1.06.13 so Kamil would have never been muled to death. Those days are over.
There is a HUGE HUGE difference before .13 and after .13.
In THIS game there was muling, look at initial turns first ...
HITMAN202
A few questions..
1) Has Sapper been "grinding you down" like Pelton mentioned in other AAR's ?? What I think he means are straight up attacks that don't necessarily attempt to form pockets.
2) What has been the German/Soviet loss ratio ?? Seems other AAR's point to a 1/3 ratio or better achieves a definite German advantage.
3) If Sapper had conducted a more sensible blizzard defense (retreat more) would the additional troops and better morale now make a major (significant) difference ???





