ORIGINAL: Kayoz
If you don't have any facts or figures, how can you discuss an opinion; much less a business one?
Also, I think Erik knows his job well enough to judge for himself whether or not Steam distribution is worthwhile. Respecting his decision is a "strong view" I do hold to.
I think you're expecting more rigorous analysis than is appropriate for a forum such as this.
Granted, opinions supported by facts and figures are more likely to be accepted, and deservedly so. But facts and figures don't always factor in to discussions of opinion. It doesn't seem right to attempt to shut down conversation on a topic just because people aren't citing statistics to support their opinions. People should feel free to express their opinions here. Take, for example, your opinion that we should respect Erik's business decisions. You didn't (and probably couldn't) cite any figures to support this assertion. Instead, you probably have what you consider to be good reasons for your view. In a discussion of this opinion on this forum, citing your reasons would be enough.
You might be conflating knowledge with opinion. Knowledge is the result of positive analysis (what is demonstrably true) while opinion is the result of normative analysis (what ought to be true). I don't think the participants here are claiming certain knowledge about Matrix Games' business decisions. They're only expressing their opinion about what they'd like Matrix Games to do.