

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition


[/center]ORIGINAL: ny59giants
Just for Greyjoy.
![]()


ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
Just one comment Jocke - I see that your roster includes 762nd Tank Bn which is still showing as restricted to the Hawaiian Dept. I presume you have PP to free it up?
And an afterthought - check the COs of your units on the rooster roster and weed out all the chickens! [:)]

No fair Jocke - you are a year further into your supply accumulation than Michael's game! You might have to wait a while for him to match your bet!ORIGINAL: JocMeister
ORIGINAL: ny59giants
Just for Greyjoy.
![]()
I call your measly 41 million Supply and 32 million fuel and raise you 83 million Supply and 65 million fuel! [:D]
![]()
ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
Ah, mythology. I had thought Swedish military history. I guess I could have googled, but it's easier to ask. [:)]
If you put 200 xAKs' worth of supplies on a 6000-stacking-limit base I think you could go well into the 1950s with a couple of divisions. Overstacking has to be watched, but I have some overstacks now in my game and it's not a big deal for a little while. I think people make too much of it. Whether it was in the patch stream or not (I know witps did some tests in the very early days and got extreme results), I think it can be managed. Especially ini 1944 when you have literal mountians of supplies.
Well, obviously not if you're playing the Evil side [:D] in a DBB mod. I consider myself happy when i have 3/4,000 supplies to spare...[X(]
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
And an afterthought - check the COs of your units on the rooster roster and weed out all the chickens! [:)]
ORIGINAL: JocMeister
One small spelling mistake and I´ll be mocked forever? [:D]
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: JocMeister
One small spelling mistake and I´ll be mocked forever? [:D]
Tell them it's a malapropism and send them to read up on Richard Brinsley Sheridan.

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: JocMeister
One small spelling mistake and I´ll be mocked forever? [:D]
Tell them it's a malapropism and send them to read up on Richard Brinsley Sheridan.
Uhm, what? [:D]
Ground combat at Biak (87,110)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 13863 troops, 241 guns, 339 vehicles, Assault Value = 612
Defending force 14454 troops, 83 guns, 98 vehicles, Assault Value = 392
Allied adjusted assault: 460
Japanese adjusted defense: 599
Allied assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 4)
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
668 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 66 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 2 disabled
Vehicles lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
1376 casualties reported
Squads: 12 destroyed, 88 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 33 disabled
Guns lost 32 (7 destroyed, 25 disabled)
Vehicles lost 36 (1 destroyed, 35 disabled)

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
[Air war
I destroy 240 enemy planes for only 10 of my own today. Japanese losses are 400 for the last two days. While sounding much and looking like a good result that is actually only about 5 days worth of production. So essentially I set him back 3 days with that result! Splendid! [:D]
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
Don't think of it that way. Think of it as HI used. HI used is fuel used. Add up the HI for the planes, then add the engines, and subtract that from HI available to build arms and veh points or pay pilot taxes.
The more LI you burn down the more he has to depend on HI to throw off supply. The circle tightens.




[/center]ORIGINAL: ny59giants
Almost looks like a naval scene from the book/movie, "A Bridge Too Far" as you try to force your way down just one highway with the Japanese on both sides of the road vs the Germans. Don't know how many and how well trained Erik has some of his bombers for LowN to come in fast at 1000' to hit your shipping. [:-]

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
Don't think of it that way. Think of it as HI used. HI used is fuel used. Add up the HI for the planes, then add the engines, and subtract that from HI available to build arms and veh points or pay pilot taxes.
The more LI you burn down the more he has to depend on HI to throw off supply. The circle tightens.
Well, that is one way to look at it. But its not as full of self pity as my way? [:D]
I am hemoraging planes and pilots lately. I got some hits but the costs are getting quite high for this kind of thing. Soon I'l be having the kind of pilot quality the Japanese had for real.
At least I hit some decent ships this time. I most likely won't do another today, but will have time tomorrow.
Ground combat at Noemfoor (86,110)
Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 2608 troops, 39 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 171
Defending force 8235 troops, 151 guns, 264 vehicles, Assault Value = 327
Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Assaulting units:
32nd Nav Gsn Unit
91st Infantry Regiment
47th Engineer Regiment
9th Tank Rgt /3
62nd Construction Battalion
28th JNAF AF Unit
Defending units:
627th TD Bn /3
102nd(Sep) Infantry Regiment
3rd Motor Brigade
158th(Sep) Infantry Rgt /3


Ground combat at 61,46 (near Lashio)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 34839 troops, 321 guns, 7 vehicles, Assault Value = 1485
Defending force 5790 troops, 48 guns, 13 vehicles, Assault Value = 233
Allied adjusted assault: 772
Japanese adjusted defense: 316
Allied assault odds: 2 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-) <-- Starting to have supply problems eh? [:D]
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
3112 casualties reported
Squads: 74 destroyed, 103 disabled
Non Combat: 59 destroyed, 26 disabled
Engineers: 7 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 28 (12 destroyed, 16 disabled)
Vehicles lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Units retreated 2
Units destroyed 1
Allied ground losses:
602 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 87 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!
Assaulting units:
39th Indian Division
1st New Chinese Corps
77th Chindit Brigade
111th Chindit Brigade
8th New Chinese Corps
50th Indian Para Bde /1
NCAC
25th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
23rd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
24th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
24th Indian Engineer Battalion
Defending units:
7th RTA/A Division
39th/B Division

