ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
ORIGINAL: obvert
ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
And LI has a 1000 day payback ... which means you don't break even for almost 3 years. You should never expand LI. Use that 1000 supply to go conquer another 20 LI base. [;)]
Unless you plan to hold it for three years, in which case expand it. I'm now reaping the benefits of the expansions in China, Manchuria and the HI, which are the only places I would do this. They may be firebombed in th next few months, but I'm still positive on supply. There also were not any more 20 LI bases to conquer when I did this. [;)]
I'm sorry Eric ...
but you are early '45. That means you expanded the LI in Jan/Feb 42? and you will 'benefit' for 2 - 3 months? that's 60 - 90 supply per 1000 spent, a terrible ROI ... and you will earn the allies more VP's when they destroy the factories? And you lost the use of 1000's of supply when you could have been expanding your empire in early-mid '42 when most IJ players are running short of everything including supply? And any expansoin on the HI means spedning more fuel to move more resources? I can't see the logic at all here, sorry. we agree on most things, but not this one.
I move resources primarily from returning convoys that would use the fuel anyway, right? My other runs are from Fusan and Hakodate. Not so far.
My game is in 11/44 and the first LI I added in the HI should just now be starting to produce the positive after cost. The Chinese supply will come in the next months as will that in Manchuria. Some of the LI at Hong Kong was destroyed, so that is a negative 50-60 supply cost. [:)]
In some areas I may benefit for as long as the game is on, and that of course is a gamble, but why is it a poor return on investment? Your logic doesn't make sense. Why would I want to increase my LOC (and fuel and supply expenditure) by increasing my empire further instead of planning for the future? You forget that all of these things have a cost. I didn't want a bigger Empire. The cost in expanding and defending it not to mention added fuel would dwarf the cost of expanding LI in the HI which you see as having a poor ROI. In fact that LI (in China and Manchuria as well with local resources available, no shipping) might run into late 45 or even 46 should I last that long. That would be extra supply, even if it doesn't look like a lot in total it is more, and when it counts. I want to use the late war fighters I'm getting now, not be stuck without the supply to do it.
I wasn't in fact running short on supply because I built things up slowly in 42, and the expansion stopped at historical most places except with the short term use of New Caledonia as an expendable buffer zone with little build up or supply/fuel cost. Oh, and NW OZ, but again simply as a buffer.
China cost a bit more than expected because Jocke balked at losing the whole thing, deciding he'd stand on principle that it wasn't possible in the war so why should it be here, and we agreed on this eventually and left his inner four bases intact and unconquered. I had planned for taking those with the added HI/LI and resources that would all be run locally with no shipping involved, plus the massive VP count for Chunking and Chengtu, but didn't get to have them in the end due to our agreement.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill