Tracker says Sara sunk

[Sieppo]

ORIGINAL: Feltan

Not sure if you noticed, but I try to take note of aircraft losses when I suspect a carrier may have been sunk. The daily intelligence report often shows an outsized operational or ground loss when a carrier goes under with its air wings.

Regards,
Feltan

Yes, this was discussed before .

[Sieppo]

Now I got the "reported falsely sunk" in the tracker .. And it does not show in the ships sunk list in the game either.

[Walloc]

I'd count even less on it now [;)]

Sorry Sieppo it lives for another day.

Rasmus

[obvert]

I've had ships go on the list, then off the list, then back on the list, only to be found later bombarding a Central Pacific Island. It's not easy even after years to tell with complete accuracy what was sunk in 42.

[KenchiSulla]

Saratoga is probably OK. Perhaps 2-3 months of yard time so you can take that into account into your plans.

[floydg]

ORIGINAL: Sieppo

Now I got the "reported falsely sunk" in the tracker .. And it does not show in the ships sunk list in the game either.

Unfortunately, it's working...

[;)]

[Alfred]

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


I've always been impressed with the punishment the Shokaku class took IRL. I'm not convinced the game stats models that, but I guess CA-comparable Belt/Deck armor values is OK.

It's also mind boggling to me why Japan built Unryus and not just more Shokakus. There has to be a rational reason (treaty limits? shortage of materials? what?) - does anybody know?

At the risk of hijacking this thread, you should look at this 2010 thread which factually discussed Japanese shipbuilding capabilities.

tm.asp?m=2599283&mpage=1&key=Japanese%2 ... g&#2600099

Pay particular attention to posts:

6, 9, 11, 19, 20 (important), 27 (important), 30,32 and 36.

Alfred

[Sieppo]

The plot thickens [:D].. Now the next turn the tracker again shows the Sara as sunk, now 162,119! And she even shows in the game as sunk!!! No carrier planes lost though .