Rise of the Sheep! JocMeister(A) vs. Obvert(J)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: zeeshan145

Very great service you give on this forum which tell every thing about their features briefly

Thank you. Hope you enjoyed the read! [:)]
Image
Xilana
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:18 pm

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by Xilana »

Thanks for a really engaging AAR; I hope to see a world view map again soon.

JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: venividivici10044a

Thanks for a really engaging AAR; I hope to see a world view map again soon.


Thank you! I´ll get one up during the weekend. [:)]
Image
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

No real comments. I know you have a plan or plans.

But consider that China, while having appeal, requires walking everywhere across vast distances on often crappy roads. The rail network runs where it runs and that's not really where you want to go. OTOH, you have the greatest amphibious lift capability the world has ever seen or will likely see.

Also, while 32,000 VP gains are great, you still have not faced the kamis. The ships in 1945 are big and VP-rich. Now you lose APAs, not xALKs. No matter your route you are heading into dense air fields from now on. You don't need a Level 9 AF to fly kamis from. A 2 works OK for sniping.

And, as you say, tick tock. [:)]
The Moose
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

No real comments. I know you have a plan or plans.

But consider that China, while having appeal, requires walking everywhere across vast distances on often crappy roads. The rail network runs where it runs and that's not really where you want to go. OTOH, you have the greatest amphibious lift capability the world has ever seen or will likely see.

Also, while 32,000 VP gains are great, you still have not faced the kamis. The ships in 1945 are big and VP-rich. Now you lose APAs, not xALKs. No matter your route you are heading into dense air fields from now on. You don't need a Level 9 AF to fly kamis from. A 2 works OK for sniping.

And, as you say, tick tock. [:)]

That is my worry about China too...easy to bog down and it will take forever to shift.

Kamis is a worry. As you say Erik havn´t used it in great numbers yet. The key will be to get a massive CAP up soaking the strikes and defeating them one by one. Last strike at the CVs I had a 750 plane CAP up. I hope to be able to boost that to 1100-1200 fighters on CAP using reinforcements and decreasing the strike package escort. This should allow the CAP to stay strong during the 100s of fragments that will launch.

A big worry here is that LBA strikes will come first slowly wearing the CAP down and lastly a KB strike that will manage to punch through...

Image
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

No real comments. I know you have a plan or plans.

But consider that China, while having appeal, requires walking everywhere across vast distances on often crappy roads. The rail network runs where it runs and that's not really where you want to go. OTOH, you have the greatest amphibious lift capability the world has ever seen or will likely see.

Also, while 32,000 VP gains are great, you still have not faced the kamis. The ships in 1945 are big and VP-rich. Now you lose APAs, not xALKs. No matter your route you are heading into dense air fields from now on. You don't need a Level 9 AF to fly kamis from. A 2 works OK for sniping.

And, as you say, tick tock. [:)]

That is my worry about China too...easy to bog down and it will take forever to shift.

Kamis is a worry. As you say Erik havn´t used it in great numbers yet. The key will be to get a massive CAP up soaking the strikes and defeating them one by one. Last strike at the CVs I had a 750 plane CAP up. I hope to be able to boost that to 1100-1200 fighters on CAP using reinforcements and decreasing the strike package escort. This should allow the CAP to stay strong during the 100s of fragments that will launch.

A big worry here is that LBA strikes will come first slowly wearing the CAP down and lastly a KB strike that will manage to punch through...


I've never played against kamis under the recent betas. I don't know what coordination is like now. In the past no amount of CAP really did the trick. When raids are massive some get through just as with bombing/torping. The difference is the kamis hit more often and they do a lot more damage, especially if also carrying bombs.

At this stage do the best you can, but your fighter pools are weaker than you want. You're going to get hurt.

The key for me and kamis is . . . make sure what you aim for is worth it. Don't dork around. Go for an objective that sets up the end game.
The Moose
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

The BETA changes everything. CVs are incredibly powerful now. Not only on the defense but they have an unparalleled ability to coordinate strikes the LBA simply cannot do.

To be completely honest I don´t really think LBA alone can punch through a late war allied CV fleet. I may be foolish and might end up eating my own words but thats what I believe. I launched big strike against the KB from Cotabato (level 9 AF with loads of Air HQs). I think I had 200 TBs, 400 DBs and 400 escorts. Erik got less than 100 planes on CAP over the KB. Yet none of my strikes managed to punch through. We have seen the same thing on Jap strikes against allied CVs.

If 100 planes on CAP can do that. What can 1000 planes on CAP do? I feel the biggest danger is getting the CAP worn out. Hence I feel numbers are really important.

But as I said I may come to regret my confidence in the near future. [:D]
Image
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by Lokasenna »

Kind of a side comment, but strikes from CVs seem to be better coordinated than strikes from airfields. I may have to experiment with kami units on CVs. Even with air HQ(s) and aviation support, it's tough to get much coordination in the strikes. Maybe numbers can overwhelm, but it would take a lot.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Kind of a side comment, but strikes from CVs seem to be better coordinated than strikes from airfields. I may have to experiment with kami units on CVs. Even with air HQ(s) and aviation support, it's tough to get much coordination in the strikes. Maybe numbers can overwhelm, but it would take a lot.

From what I can tell from the game (havn´t tested it in sandbox) the CV strikes were completely unchanged from whatever michaelm changed in the BETA. So they seem to work the same as "pre BETA". LBA strikes though are horrible and against a massive CV CAP I just can´t imagine anything getting through.

Again, I might come to regret that belief eventually! [:D]
Image
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Kind of a side comment, but strikes from CVs seem to be better coordinated than strikes from airfields. I may have to experiment with kami units on CVs. Even with air HQ(s) and aviation support, it's tough to get much coordination in the strikes. Maybe numbers can overwhelm, but it would take a lot.

From what I can tell from the game (havn´t tested it in sandbox) the CV strikes were completely unchanged from whatever michaelm changed in the BETA. So they seem to work the same as "pre BETA". LBA strikes though are horrible and against a massive CV CAP I just can´t imagine anything getting through.

Again, I might come to regret that belief eventually! [:D]

I want to see you risk a dozen carriers to kamis. Please! I REALLY want to see!!! [:)]

Remember too, kamis might all be 400 kt. fighters, not high and slow torpedo bombers with the fighters poking along in escort. Five-hundred Jacks coming at 100 feet? And 300 at 20,000? Run that and let us know. I'm willing to be wrong.
The Moose
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: JocMeister

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Kind of a side comment, but strikes from CVs seem to be better coordinated than strikes from airfields. I may have to experiment with kami units on CVs. Even with air HQ(s) and aviation support, it's tough to get much coordination in the strikes. Maybe numbers can overwhelm, but it would take a lot.

From what I can tell from the game (havn´t tested it in sandbox) the CV strikes were completely unchanged from whatever michaelm changed in the BETA. So they seem to work the same as "pre BETA". LBA strikes though are horrible and against a massive CV CAP I just can´t imagine anything getting through.

Again, I might come to regret that belief eventually! [:D]

I want to see you risk a dozen carriers to kamis. Please! I REALLY want to see!!! [:)]

Remember too, kamis might all be 400 kt. fighters, not high and slow torpedo bombers with the fighters poking along in escort. Five-hundred Jacks coming at 100 feet? And 300 at 20,000? Run that and let us know. I'm willing to be wrong.

I really hope he doesn´t go down to 100 ft. Engine doesn´t handle that well at all and we have been avoiding going under 4000ft since the issue arose in 43.

I don´t think Erik has converted many fighter squadrons to Kamis. Since they can´t be converted back I think he rather have fighters in the air. At least for now.

You will get your wish fulfilled in a near future. [:)] Can´t stay out of range from his Kamis for the rest of the game. Its the same thing as saying "this is as far as I go". I do intend to bring everything though. So that about 3500 CV aircraft.

I know you have had some bad experiences with Kamis against the AI (10 CVs lost? [:D]) but the BETA really is another ball game then the official. Those 800 Jacks would come in one 200-300 strike followed by a 100-150 and then 10-20 small ones. If I can get a 1000 plane CAP up plus a couple of hundred fighters on LRCAP I really doubt you can break through using the BETA.

Speculation of course but my experience with the BETA so far seems to indicate this.
Image
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by Lokasenna »

Not going under 4k is really going to limit the effectiveness of kamis, IMO.

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: JocMeister

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Kind of a side comment, but strikes from CVs seem to be better coordinated than strikes from airfields. I may have to experiment with kami units on CVs. Even with air HQ(s) and aviation support, it's tough to get much coordination in the strikes. Maybe numbers can overwhelm, but it would take a lot.

From what I can tell from the game (havn´t tested it in sandbox) the CV strikes were completely unchanged from whatever michaelm changed in the BETA. So they seem to work the same as "pre BETA". LBA strikes though are horrible and against a massive CV CAP I just can´t imagine anything getting through.

Again, I might come to regret that belief eventually! [:D]

I want to see you risk a dozen carriers to kamis. Please! I REALLY want to see!!! [:)]

Remember too, kamis might all be 400 kt. fighters, not high and slow torpedo bombers with the fighters poking along in escort. Five-hundred Jacks coming at 100 feet? And 300 at 20,000? Run that and let us know. I'm willing to be wrong.

This is exactly the sort of testing I need to do before our game gets to late '43 [;)]. I think I'll keep the results secret!
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Not going under 4k is really going to limit the effectiveness of kamis, IMO.

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: JocMeister




From what I can tell from the game (havn´t tested it in sandbox) the CV strikes were completely unchanged from whatever michaelm changed in the BETA. So they seem to work the same as "pre BETA". LBA strikes though are horrible and against a massive CV CAP I just can´t imagine anything getting through.

Again, I might come to regret that belief eventually! [:D]

I want to see you risk a dozen carriers to kamis. Please! I REALLY want to see!!! [:)]

Remember too, kamis might all be 400 kt. fighters, not high and slow torpedo bombers with the fighters poking along in escort. Five-hundred Jacks coming at 100 feet? And 300 at 20,000? Run that and let us know. I'm willing to be wrong.

This is exactly the sort of testing I need to do before our game gets to late '43 [;)]. I think I'll keep the results secret!

So, you're assuming early activation? [8D]
The Moose
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by Lokasenna »

Nah, but I will need some time to arrange my airframes and pilots, I think... Early activation would be at once dreadful and fun.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
Not going under 4k is really going to limit the effectiveness of kamis, IMO.

Its not just kamis being affected by this. But everything flying. I havn´t tested this but someone else did. I think it was Captain Cruft? Basically by going low enough you always go through. I think it has to do with how detection times work. If you set something at 100ft you are going to get like 4 minutes of detection time. Even if you have 400 fighters on 500ft CAP the low detection time guarantee the strike will go through. Whoever did the testing was able to sink the entire allied CV fleet 100% of the times. Guaranteed. He decided to not exploit this though. Pretty sure it was Cruft?

This was pre BETA though. Don´t know if anything has changed in this regard in the BETAs.

As I said I havn´t tested this myself but we saw evidence of this in 43 when Erik was doing a lot of striking at 1000 ft where CAP was completely unable to even interact with incoming strikes regardless of settings. So after that none of us have been going that low. I have no reason to believe Erik is going to start exploiting that all of the sudden.
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
Early activation would be at once dreadful and fun.

So far i this game Kamis havn´t made any impact. But Erik hasn´t really used them either. I think he is of the same philosophy as GJ (so am I). Why use Kamis as long as you have good enough pilots? Sure they might make a bigger boom but bombing also makes a portion of them able to go back and try another day.

Having no experience at all (doh!) with Kamis I see it as an option once pilots quality starts to really go down. A big thing to remember here is that once converted to Kami you can NEVER convert back. And need can change throughout a year or two.
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

[font="Verdana"]10th-11th February -45[/font]
______________________________________________________________________________

Obviously the center of attention right now is Luzon

------------------------
Luzon
------------------------

With Manila secured the Allies push forward. Armor has already reached central Luzon. With the help of the 2Es I hope to clear the road north quickly. I want to box the Japanese in at Lingayen and cut them off from the north. So armor race north will the infantry pursuit the battered defenders of Manila.

At the same time we start dismantling Cotabato and Iloilo as rear bases. From now on the area and bases around Manila will take over that function. I have already prepared much of this in advance and hope to move everything to Luzon in just two weeks.

We also use the 4E armada to start closing the airfields on Luzon. There will be no Japanese aerial evacuation from Luzon.

------------------------
Thailand/Indochina
------------------------

Things are progressing nicely. But it looks like Erik has lifted out a lot of troops under my nose at CRB. I hate this aspect of the game. Nonetheless I´ve decided to let him do that. So what if he can get two IDs out? All the heavy equipment will be left making those two IDs almost useless and a lot easier to kill somewhere else without their equipment.

Found a roadblock of 15 Units in the jungles between Nanning and Lang Son. That makes a lot more sense than what I´ve seen earlier. Looks like 50.000 men in x2 terrain with more coming. Another superstack forming? Might get tricky depending on what kind of troops they are.

In a sense this was positive because it made my choice on the next move a lot easier. I´ll outline my next move in a bigger post with some maps this weekend. Basically I won´t give up on China but I won´t shift the SOPAC/SWPAC advance towards China. What I perceive as big mistake on Eriks part is too enticing to miss out on. This mistake also goes in line with my earlier thinking. So it fits the bill nice and snuggly.

------------------------
DEI
------------------------

BFs and artillery will arrive at Soerabaja shortly. I´m going to pull the IDs and armor I talked about earlier. I really have no interest in Java and I´m just taking it because Erik left it empty for me. So I will clear out Java and possible land on Sumatra depending on how it looks. But it will be done with a skeleton force.

------------------------
Strat bombing
------------------------

Bombers will try and hit the HI at Hiroshima/Kure tomorrow. Hopefully losses will be light and results good enough to warrant strikes like this in the future.

Here is a screen of Luzon.


Image
Attachments
Luzon6.jpg
Luzon6.jpg (312.69 KiB) Viewed 304 times
Image
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by ny59giants »

But it looks like Erik has lifted out a lot of troops under my nose at CRB. I hate this aspect of the game. Nonetheless I´ve decided to let him do that. So what if he can get two IDs out? All the heavy equipment will be left making those two IDs almost useless and a lot easier to kill somewhere else without their equipment.

Do you have an AF close by that you can base some of your long ranged fighters on LRCAP over CRB to intercept his transport planes??
[center]Image[/center]
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants
But it looks like Erik has lifted out a lot of troops under my nose at CRB. I hate this aspect of the game. Nonetheless I´ve decided to let him do that. So what if he can get two IDs out? All the heavy equipment will be left making those two IDs almost useless and a lot easier to kill somewhere else without their equipment.

Do you have an AF close by that you can base some of your long ranged fighters on LRCAP over CRB to intercept his transport planes??

Yeah at Bangkok. But its 4 hexes away so only the P51Ds can reach. I´m going to give it a go next turn and see if I can nail anything. I hate those transports! Grrr! [:@]
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Manila liberated!!!

Post by JocMeister »

Got the math a bit wrong in my above post. This is the new transport intercept formula in the BETA. It was changed after I discovered transport interception didn´t work.
ORIGINAL: michaelm

At the moment that is how it looks. Not changed from WITP.
Air transport phase is outside the normal air phase so has its own 'rules'.
The beta just released changes the formula to (3*range +2), plus lets CAP with DT get correct range.

So 4 hexes mean 12+2 = 14 hexes which means P51 and P38s can reach!
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”